Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 101

1.

Bimodality of stable and plastic traits in plants.

Fisher J, Bensal E, Zamir D.

Theor Appl Genet. 2017 Sep;130(9):1915-1926. doi: 10.1007/s00122-017-2933-1. Epub 2017 Jun 12.

PMID:
28608227
2.

Yield quantitative trait loci from wild tomato are predominately expressed by the shoot.

Gur A, Semel Y, Osorio S, Friedmann M, Seekh S, Ghareeb B, Mohammad A, Pleban T, Gera G, Fernie AR, Zamir D.

Theor Appl Genet. 2011 Feb;122(2):405-20. doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1456-9. Epub 2010 Sep 26.

3.

The making of a bell pepper-shaped tomato fruit: identification of loci controlling fruit morphology in Yellow Stuffer tomato.

van der Knaap E, Tanksley SD.

Theor Appl Genet. 2003 Jun;107(1):139-47. Epub 2003 Mar 21.

PMID:
12835939
4.

Genetic architecture of novel traits in the hopi sunflower.

Wills DM, Abdel-Haleem H, Knapp SJ, Burke JM.

J Hered. 2010 Nov-Dec;101(6):727-36. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esq089. Epub 2010 Aug 8.

PMID:
20696668
5.

Linkage relationships among multiple QTL for horticultural traits and late blight (P. infestans) resistance on chromosome 5 introgressed from wild tomato Solanum habrochaites.

Haggard JE, Johnson EB, St Clair DA.

G3 (Bethesda). 2013 Dec 9;3(12):2131-46. doi: 10.1534/g3.113.007195. Erratum in: G3 (Bethesda). 2014 Jan;4(1):197.

6.

Genotype by watering regime interaction in cultivated tomato: lessons from linkage mapping and gene expression.

Albert E, Gricourt J, Bertin N, Bonnefoi J, Pateyron S, Tamby JP, Bitton F, Causse M.

Theor Appl Genet. 2016 Feb;129(2):395-418. doi: 10.1007/s00122-015-2635-5. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

PMID:
26582510
7.

Genome-wide analysis of auxin response factor (ARF) gene family from tomato and analysis of their role in flower and fruit development.

Kumar R, Tyagi AK, Sharma AK.

Mol Genet Genomics. 2011 Mar;285(3):245-60. doi: 10.1007/s00438-011-0602-7. Epub 2011 Feb 3.

PMID:
21290147
8.

The genetic basis of fruit morphology in horticultural crops: lessons from tomato and melon.

Monforte AJ, Diaz A, Caño-Delgado A, van der Knaap E.

J Exp Bot. 2014 Aug;65(16):4625-37. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru017. Epub 2014 Feb 11. Review.

PMID:
24520021
9.

Exploring the natural variation for seedling traits and their link with seed dimensions in tomato.

Khan N, Kazmi RH, Willems LA, van Heusden AW, Ligterink W, Hilhorst HW.

PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043991. Epub 2012 Aug 30.

10.

A quantitative genetic basis for leaf morphology in a set of precisely defined tomato introgression lines.

Chitwood DH, Kumar R, Headland LR, Ranjan A, Covington MF, Ichihashi Y, Fulop D, Jiménez-Gómez JM, Peng J, Maloof JN, Sinha NR.

Plant Cell. 2013 Jul;25(7):2465-81. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.112391. Epub 2013 Jul 19.

11.

Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild.

Tanksley SD, McCouch SR.

Science. 1997 Aug 22;277(5329):1063-6. Review.

PMID:
9262467
12.

Advanced backcross QTL analysis of a Lycopersicon esculentum x L. pennellii cross and identification of possible orthologs in the Solanaceae.

Frary A, Fulton TM, Zamir D, Tanksley SD.

Theor Appl Genet. 2004 Feb;108(3):485-96. Epub 2004 Jan 22.

PMID:
14740082
13.

Quantitative genetic analysis indicates natural selection on leaf phenotypes across wild tomato species (Solanum sect. Lycopersicon; Solanaceae).

Muir CD, Pease JB, Moyle LC.

Genetics. 2014 Dec;198(4):1629-43. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.169276. Epub 2014 Oct 8.

14.

Complex genetics controls natural variation among seed quality phenotypes in a recombinant inbred population of an interspecific cross between Solanum lycopersicum × Solanum pimpinellifolium.

Kazmi RH, Khan N, Willems LA, VAN Heusden AW, Ligterink W, Hilhorst HW.

Plant Cell Environ. 2012 May;35(5):929-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02463.x. Epub 2011 Dec 8.

15.

Genome-wide SNP discovery and QTL mapping for fruit quality traits in inbred backcross lines (IBLs) of solanum pimpinellifolium using genotyping by sequencing.

Celik I, Gurbuz N, Uncu AT, Frary A, Doganlar S.

BMC Genomics. 2017 Jan 3;18(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-3406-7.

16.

Genetic and physiological analysis of tomato fruit weight and composition: influence of carbon availability on QTL detection.

Prudent M, Causse M, Génard M, Tripodi P, Grandillo S, Bertin N.

J Exp Bot. 2009;60(3):923-37. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern338. Epub 2009 Jan 29.

17.

RAPD markers for the identification of yield traits in tomatoes under heat stress via bulked segregant analysis.

Lin KH, Lo HF, Lee SP, George Kuo C, Chen JT, Yeh WL.

Hereditas. 2006 Dec;143(2006):142-54.

18.

QTL analysis of plant development and fruit traits in pepper and performance of selective phenotyping.

Barchi L, Lefebvre V, Sage-Palloix AM, Lanteri S, Palloix A.

Theor Appl Genet. 2009 Apr;118(6):1157-71. doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-0970-0. Epub 2009 Feb 15.

19.

Wide-genome QTL mapping of fruit quality traits in a tomato RIL population derived from the wild-relative species Solanum pimpinellifolium L.

Capel C, Fernández del Carmen A, Alba JM, Lima-Silva V, Hernández-Gras F, Salinas M, Boronat A, Angosto T, Botella MA, Fernández-Muñoz R, Granell A, Capel J, Lozano R.

Theor Appl Genet. 2015 Oct;128(10):2019-35. doi: 10.1007/s00122-015-2563-4. Epub 2015 Jul 12.

PMID:
26163766
20.

Regulatory change in YABBY-like transcription factor led to evolution of extreme fruit size during tomato domestication.

Cong B, Barrero LS, Tanksley SD.

Nat Genet. 2008 Jun;40(6):800-4. doi: 10.1038/ng.144. Epub 2008 May 11.

PMID:
18469814

Supplemental Content

Support Center