Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 99

1.

Comparison of trapezius squeeze test and jaw thrust as clinical indicators for laryngeal mask airway insertion in spontaneously breathing children.

Dinesh Kumar KK, Bhardwaj N, Yaddanapudi S.

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jan-Mar;33(1):71-75. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.202204.

2.

[Comparison of jaw thrust and trapezius squeezing test as indicators for laryngeal mask airway insertion in infants and young children].

Liu JZ, Zhao J, Zhang YJ.

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Feb;96(6):451-5. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.06.009. Chinese.

PMID:
26875922
3.

Comparison of the trapezius squeezing test and jaw thrust as indicators for laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults.

Chang CH, Kim SH, Shim YH, Kim JH, Shin YS.

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011 Sep;61(3):201-4. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2011.61.3.201. Epub 2011 Sep 23.

4.

Trapezius squeeze test as an indicator for depth of anesthesia for laryngeal mask airway insertion in children.

Hooda S, Kaur K, Rattan KN, Thakur AK, Kamal K.

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Jan;28(1):28-31. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.92430.

5.

Comparison of sevoflurane and propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion and pressor response in patients undergoing gynecological procedures.

Chavan SG, Mandhyan S, Gujar SH, Shinde GP.

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jan-Mar;33(1):97-101. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_313_15.

6.

Optimal conditions for Laryngeal Mask Airway insertion in children can be determined by the trapezius squeezing test.

Chang CH, Shim YH, Shin YS, Lee KY.

J Clin Anesth. 2008 Mar;20(2):99-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2007.09.007.

PMID:
18410863
7.
8.

Optimal anaesthetic depth for LMA insertion.

Krishnappa S, Kundra P.

Indian J Anaesth. 2011 Sep;55(5):504-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.89887.

9.

Comparison of sevoflurane with propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults.

Ti LK, Chow MY, Lee TL.

Anesth Analg. 1999 Apr;88(4):908-12.

PMID:
10195546
10.

Comparison of the LMA-classic with the new disposable soft seal laryngeal mask in spontaneously breathing adult patients.

Van Zundert AA, Fonck K, Al-Shaikh B, Mortier E.

Anesthesiology. 2003 Nov;99(5):1066-71.

PMID:
14576541
11.
12.

Comparison of sevoflurane concentration for insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation in children (correlation with BIS).

Mudakanagoudar MS, Santhosh MC.

Braz J Anesthesiol. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):24-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Oct 27.

13.

Comparison of Four Different Supraglottic Airway Devices in Terms of Efficacy, Intra-ocular Pressure and Haemodynamic Parameters in Children Undergoing Ophthalmic Surgery.

Peker G, Takmaz SA, Baltacı B, Başar H, Kotanoğlu M.

Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2015 Oct;43(5):304-12. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2015.49091. Epub 2015 Aug 21.

14.

[Minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane for insertion of laryngeal mask airway in children].

He L, Zhang XF.

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Apr 21;89(15):1021-3. Chinese.

PMID:
19595249
15.

[Comparison of sevoflurane concentration for insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation in children (correlation with BIS)].

Mudakanagoudar MS, Santhosh MC.

Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):24-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2014.07.012. Epub 2015 Nov 29. Portuguese.

16.

Influence of nitrous oxide on minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane for laryngeal mask insertion in children.

Kihara S, Yaguchi Y, Inomata S, Watanabe S, Brimacombe JR, Taguchi N, Komatsuzaki T.

Anesthesiology. 2003 Nov;99(5):1055-8.

PMID:
14576538
17.
18.

Desflurane enhances reactivity during the use of the laryngeal mask airway.

Arain SR, Shankar H, Ebert TJ.

Anesthesiology. 2005 Sep;103(3):495-9.

PMID:
16129973
19.
20.

Comparative study between I-gel, a new supraglottic airway device, and classical laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized spontaneously ventilated patients.

Helmy AM, Atef HM, El-Taher EM, Henidak AM.

Saudi J Anaesth. 2010 Sep;4(3):131-6. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.71250.

Supplemental Content

Support Center