Similar articles for PMID: 28269232

Year	Number of Results
1990	1
1994	3
1996	6
1997	2
1998	5
1999	2
2000	4
2001	5
2002	7
2003	2
2004	8
2005	4
2006	3
2007	2
2008	7
2009	3
2011	4
2012	5
2013	3
2014	6
2015	2
2016	5
2017	6
2018	5
2019	6
2024	0

1

The effect of the aortic valve orientation on cavitation.

Johansen P, Travis BR, Smerup M, Decker Christensen T, Funder J, Nyboe C, Nygaard H, Hasenkam JM. Johansen P, et al. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016 Aug;2016:4305-4308. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591679. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016. PMID: 28269232

2

Indication of cavitation in mechanical heart valve patients.

Andersen TS, Johansen P, Paulsen PK, Nygaard H, Hasenkam JM. Andersen TS, et al. J Heart Valve Dis. 2003 Nov;12(6):790-6. J Heart Valve Dis. 2003. PMID: 14658822

3

Intraoperative and postoperative evaluation of cavitation in mechanical heart valve patients.

Andersen TS, Johansen P, Christensen BO, Paulsen PK, Nygaard H, Hasenkam JM. Andersen TS, et al. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Jan;81(1):34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.06.080. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006. PMID: 16368331

4

Omnicarbon 21 mm aortic valve prosthesis: in vitro hydrodynamic and echo-Doppler study.

Dumont K, Segers R, Vandenberghe S, Van Nooten G, Verdonck P. Dumont K, et al. Int J Artif Organs. 2002 Aug;25(8):783-90. doi: 10.1177/039139880202500806. Int J Artif Organs. 2002. PMID: 12296463

5

Changes in turbulence with rotation of the omnicarbon prosthesis.

Travis BR, Nyboe C, Christensen TD, Smerup M, Johansen P, Nygaard H, Hasenkam JM. Travis BR, et al. ASAIO J. 2007 Jul-Aug;53(4):410-4. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3180698464. ASAIO J. 2007. PMID: 17667223

6

In-vivo prediction of cavitation near a Medtronic Hall valve.

Johansen P, Andersen TS, Hasenkam JM, Nygaard H. Johansen P, et al. J Heart Valve Dis. 2004 Jul;13(4):651-8. J Heart Valve Dis. 2004. PMID: 15311874

7

Comparison of hemodynamic performance of Medtronic Hall 21 mm versus St. Jude Medical 23 mm prostheses in pigs.

Kleine P, Abdel-Rahman U, Klesius AA, Scherer M, Simon A, Moritz A. Kleine P, et al. J Heart Valve Dis. 2002 Nov;11(6):857-63. J Heart Valve Dis. 2002. PMID: 12479289

8

The hemodynamic performance of standard bileaflet valves is impaired by a tilted implantation position.

Hartrumpf M, Albes JM, Krempl T, Rudolph V, Wahlers T. Hartrumpf M, et al. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003 Mar;23(3):283-91. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00804-7. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003. PMID: 12614795

9

Effect of mechanical aortic valve orientation on coronary artery flow: comparison of tilting disc versus bileaflet prostheses in pigs.

Kleine P, Scherer M, Abdel-Rahman U, Klesius AA, Ackermann H, Moritz A. Kleine P, et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Nov;124(5):925-32. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2002.126046. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002. PMID: 12407375 Free article.

10

Medtronic Hall versus St. Jude Medical mechanical aortic valve: downstream turbulences with respect to rotation in pigs.

Kleine P, Perthel M, Nygaard H, Hansen SB, Paulsen PK, Riis C, Laas J. Kleine P, et al. J Heart Valve Dis. 1998 Sep;7(5):548-55. J Heart Valve Dis. 1998. PMID: 9793855

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

100 results

Results by year