Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 102

1.

Genomics advances the study of inbreeding depression in the wild.

Kardos M, Taylor HR, Ellegren H, Luikart G, Allendorf FW.

Evol Appl. 2016 Oct 23;9(10):1205-1218. eCollection 2016 Dec. Review.

2.

Genomic consequences of intensive inbreeding in an isolated wolf population.

Kardos M, Åkesson M, Fountain T, Flagstad Ø, Liberg O, Olason P, Sand H, Wabakken P, Wikenros C, Ellegren H.

Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Jan;2(1):124-131. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0375-4. Epub 2017 Nov 20.

PMID:
29158554
3.

Lifetime Fitness Costs of Inbreeding and Being Inbred in a Critically Endangered Bird.

Harrisson KA, Magrath MJL, Yen JDL, Pavlova A, Murray N, Quin B, Menkhorst P, Miller KA, Cartwright K, Sunnucks P.

Curr Biol. 2019 Aug 19;29(16):2711-2717.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.064. Epub 2019 Aug 1.

PMID:
31378604
4.

Measuring individual inbreeding in the age of genomics: marker-based measures are better than pedigrees.

Kardos M, Luikart G, Allendorf FW.

Heredity (Edinb). 2015 Jul;115(1):63-72. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2015.17. Epub 2015 Mar 18.

5.

Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?

Wang J.

Theor Popul Biol. 2016 Feb;107:4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Sep 3.

PMID:
26344786
6.

Genomic analysis reveals depression due to both individual and maternal inbreeding in a free-living mammal population.

Bérénos C, Ellis PA, Pilkington JG, Pemberton JM.

Mol Ecol. 2016 Jul;25(13):3152-68. doi: 10.1111/mec.13681. Epub 2016 Jun 6.

7.

No evidence of inbreeding depression in a Tasmanian devil insurance population despite significant variation in inbreeding.

Gooley R, Hogg CJ, Belov K, Grueber CE.

Sci Rep. 2017 May 12;7(1):1830. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02000-y.

8.

Genomic Consequences of Population Decline in the Endangered Florida Scrub-Jay.

Chen N, Cosgrove EJ, Bowman R, Fitzpatrick JW, Clark AG.

Curr Biol. 2016 Nov 7;26(21):2974-2979. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.062. Epub 2016 Oct 13.

9.

Inbreeding depression across the lifespan in a wild mammal population.

Huisman J, Kruuk LE, Ellis PA, Clutton-Brock T, Pemberton JM.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 29;113(13):3585-90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1518046113. Epub 2016 Mar 15.

10.

Invited review: Inbreeding in the genomics era: Inbreeding, inbreeding depression, and management of genomic variability.

Howard JT, Pryce JE, Baes C, Maltecca C.

J Dairy Sci. 2017 Aug;100(8):6009-6024. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12787. Epub 2017 Jun 7. Review.

11.

Environmental conditions affect the magnitude of inbreeding depression in survival of Darwin's finches.

Keller LF, Grant PR, Grant BR, Petren K.

Evolution. 2002 Jun;56(6):1229-39.

PMID:
12144022
12.

On individual-specific prediction of hidden inbreeding depression load.

Casellas J.

J Anim Breed Genet. 2018 Feb;135(1):37-44. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12308. Epub 2017 Dec 11.

PMID:
29230876
13.

Heterozygosity-fitness correlations and inbreeding depression in two critically endangered mammals.

Ruiz-López MJ, Gañan N, Godoy JA, Del Olmo A, Garde J, Espeso G, Vargas A, Martinez F, Roldán ER, Gomendio M.

Conserv Biol. 2012 Dec;26(6):1121-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01916.x. Epub 2012 Aug 16.

PMID:
22897325
14.

The imprecision of heterozygosity-fitness correlations hinders the detection of inbreeding and inbreeding depression in a threatened species.

Grueber CE, Waters JM, Jamieson IG.

Mol Ecol. 2011 Jan;20(1):67-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04930.x. Epub 2010 Nov 19.

PMID:
21087447
15.

Inbreeding depression in a critically endangered carnivore.

Norén K, Godoy E, Dalén L, Meijer T, Angerbjörn A.

Mol Ecol. 2016 Jul;25(14):3309-18. doi: 10.1111/mec.13674.

PMID:
27135988
16.

Conservation genomics of threatened animal species.

Steiner CC, Putnam AS, Hoeck PE, Ryder OA.

Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2013 Jan;1:261-81. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103636. Epub 2013 Jan 3. Review.

PMID:
25387020
17.

Identification of genomic regions associated with inbreeding depression in Holstein and Jersey dairy cattle.

Pryce JE, Haile-Mariam M, Goddard ME, Hayes BJ.

Genet Sel Evol. 2014 Nov 18;46:71. doi: 10.1186/s12711-014-0071-7.

18.

How much does inbreeding contribute to the reduced fitness of hatchery-born steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in the wild?

Christie MR, French RA, Marine ML, Blouin MS.

J Hered. 2014 Jan-Feb;105(1):111-9. doi: 10.1093/jhered/est076. Epub 2013 Nov 1.

PMID:
24187426
19.

Conservation genomic analysis of domestic and wild pig populations from the Iberian Peninsula.

Herrero-Medrano JM, Megens HJ, Groenen MA, Ramis G, Bosse M, Pérez-Enciso M, Crooijmans RP.

BMC Genet. 2013 Oct 30;14:106. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-14-106.

20.

Molecular and pedigree measures of relatedness provide similar estimates of inbreeding depression in a bottlenecked population.

Townsend SM, Jamieson IG.

J Evol Biol. 2013 Apr;26(4):889-99. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12109. Epub 2013 Mar 15.

Supplemental Content

Support Center