Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 236

1.

Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique?

Wegelin O, van Melick HHE, Hooft L, Bosch JLHR, Reitsma HB, Barentsz JO, Somford DM.

Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):517-531. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.041. Epub 2016 Aug 25. Review.

PMID:
27568655
2.

Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies.

Arsov C, Rabenalt R, Blondin D, Quentin M, Hiester A, Godehardt E, Gabbert HE, Becker N, Antoch G, Albers P, Schimmöller L.

Eur Urol. 2015 Oct;68(4):713-20. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jun 23.

PMID:
26116294
3.

The FUTURE Trial: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial on Target Biopsy Techniques Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies.

Wegelin O, Exterkate L, van der Leest M, Kummer JA, Vreuls W, de Bruin PC, Bosch JLHR, Barentsz JO, Somford DM, van Melick HHE.

Eur Urol. 2018 Dec 3. pii: S0302-2838(18)30939-4. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.040. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30522912
4.

Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Schoots IG, Roobol MJ, Nieboer D, Bangma CH, Steyerberg EW, Hunink MG.

Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):438-50. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.037. Epub 2014 Dec 3. Review.

PMID:
25480312
5.

A Randomized Controlled Trial To Assess and Compare the Outcomes of Two-core Prostate Biopsy Guided by Fused Magnetic Resonance and Transrectal Ultrasound Images and Traditional 12-core Systematic Biopsy.

Baco E, Rud E, Eri LM, Moen G, Vlatkovic L, Svindland A, Eggesbø HB, Ukimura O.

Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):149-56. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.03.041. Epub 2015 Apr 7.

6.

Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review.

Valerio M, Donaldson I, Emberton M, Ehdaie B, Hadaschik BA, Marks LS, Mozer P, Rastinehad AR, Ahmed HU.

Eur Urol. 2015 Jul;68(1):8-19. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.026. Epub 2014 Nov 1. Review.

PMID:
25454618
7.

Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.

Tonttila PP, Lantto J, Pääkkö E, Piippo U, Kauppila S, Lammentausta E, Ohtonen P, Vaarala MH.

Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.05.024. Epub 2015 May 29.

PMID:
26033153
8.

Comparison of patient comfort between MR-guided in-bore and MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsies within a prospective randomized trial.

Arsov C, Rabenalt R, Quentin M, Hiester A, Blondin D, Albers P, Antoch G, Schimmöller L.

World J Urol. 2016 Feb;34(2):215-20. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1612-6. Epub 2015 Jun 9.

PMID:
26055645
9.

Elastic Versus Rigid Image Registration in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Venderink W, de Rooij M, Sedelaar JPM, Huisman HJ, Fütterer JJ.

Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Mar;4(2):219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Jul 29. Review.

PMID:
28753777
10.

The prostate cancer detection rates of CEUS-targeted versus MRI-targeted versus systematic TRUS-guided biopsies in biopsy-naïve men: a prospective, comparative clinical trial using the same patients.

Postema AW, Scheltema MJ, Mannaerts CK, Van Sloun RJ, Idzenga T, Mischi M, Engelbrecht MR, De la Rosette JJ, Wijkstra H.

BMC Urol. 2017 Apr 5;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0213-7.

11.

Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.

Boesen L.

Dan Med J. 2017 Feb;64(2). pii: B5327. Review.

PMID:
28157066
12.
13.

Multiparametric MRI-targeted TRUS prostate biopsies using visual registration.

Puech P, Ouzzane A, Gaillard V, Betrouni N, Renard B, Villers A, Lemaitre L.

Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:819360. doi: 10.1155/2014/819360. Epub 2014 Dec 1. Review.

14.
15.

Additional value of magnetic resonance-targeted biopsies to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.

von Below C, Wassberg C, Norberg M, Tolf A, Kullberg J, Ladjevardi S, Häggman M, Bill Axelson A, Ahlström H.

Scand J Urol. 2017 Apr;51(2):107-113. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2017.1281346. Epub 2017 Feb 24.

PMID:
28635568
16.

Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

Pepe P, Garufi A, Priolo G, Pennisi M.

Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Feb;15(1):e33-e36. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.07.007. Epub 2016 Jul 21.

PMID:
27530436
17.
18.

The value of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US)-fusion biopsy platforms in prostate cancer detection: a systematic review.

Gayet M, van der Aa A, Beerlage HP, Schrier BP, Mulders PF, Wijkstra H.

BJU Int. 2016 Mar;117(3):392-400. doi: 10.1111/bju.13247. Epub 2015 Aug 28. Review.

19.

Targeted MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy in men with previous prostate biopsies using a novel registration software and multiparametric MRI PI-RADS scores: first results.

Tewes S, Hueper K, Hartung D, Imkamp F, Herrmann TR, Weidemann J, Renckly S, Kuczyk MA, Wacker F, Peters I.

World J Urol. 2015 Nov;33(11):1707-14. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1525-4. Epub 2015 Mar 14.

PMID:
25774003
20.

Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes.

Meng X, Rosenkrantz AB, Mendhiratta N, Fenstermaker M, Huang R, Wysock JS, Bjurlin MA, Marshall S, Deng FM, Zhou M, Melamed J, Huang WC, Lepor H, Taneja SS.

Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):512-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jun 22.

Supplemental Content

Support Center