Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 427

1.

The Biotribology of PEEK-on-HXLPE Bearings Is Comparable to Traditional Bearings on a Multidirectional Pin-on-disk Tester.

Baykal D, Siskey RS, Underwood RJ, Briscoe A, Kurtz SM.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Nov;474(11):2384-2393.

2.

Are PEEK-on-Ceramic Bearings an Option for Total Disc Arthroplasty? An In Vitro Tribology Study.

Siskey R, Ciccarelli L, Lui MK, Kurtz SM.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Nov;474(11):2428-2440.

3.

The Biologic Response to Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Wear Particles in Total Joint Replacement: A Systematic Review.

Stratton-Powell AA, Pasko KM, Brockett CL, Tipper JL.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Nov;474(11):2394-2404. Epub 2016 Jul 18. Review.

4.
5.

Is there a difference in total knee arthroplasty risk of revision in highly crosslinked versus conventional polyethylene?

Paxton EW, Inacio MC, Kurtz S, Love R, Cafri G, Namba RS.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Mar;473(3):999-1008. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4046-3.

6.

Influence of contact pressure, cross-shear and counterface material on the wear of PEEK and CFR-PEEK for orthopaedic applications.

Brockett CL, Carbone S, Abdelgaied A, Fisher J, Jennings LM.

J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Oct;63:10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 11.

7.

Do oxidized zirconium femoral heads reduce polyethylene wear in cemented THAs? A blinded randomized clinical trial.

Zaoui A, Hage SE, Langlois J, Scemama C, Courpied JP, Hamadouche M.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3822-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4414-7.

8.

Alternative bearing materials for intervertebral disc arthroplasty.

Grupp TM, Meisel HJ, Cotton JA, Schwiesau J, Fritz B, Blömer W, Jansson V.

Biomaterials. 2010 Jan;31(3):523-31. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.064. Epub 2009 Oct 7.

PMID:
19815271
9.

Wear studies on the likely performance of CFR-PEEK/CoCrMo for use as artificial joint bearing materials.

Scholes SC, Unsworth A.

J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009 Jan;20(1):163-70. doi: 10.1007/s10856-008-3558-3. Epub 2008 Aug 14.

PMID:
18704647
10.

Low wear rates seen in THAs with highly crosslinked polyethylene at 9 to 14 years in patients younger than age 50 years.

Garvin KL, White TC, Dusad A, Hartman CW, Martell J.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3829-35. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4422-7.

11.

Advances in tribological testing of artificial joint biomaterials using multidirectional pin-on-disk testers.

Baykal D, Siskey RS, Haider H, Saikko V, Ahlroos T, Kurtz SM.

J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Mar;31:117-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.05.020. Epub 2013 May 29. Review.

12.

An investigation into PEEK-on-PEEK as a bearing surface candidate for cervical total disc replacement.

Kraft M, Koch DK, Bushelow M.

Spine J. 2012 Jul;12(7):603-11. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.07.009.

PMID:
22964013
13.

Does a PEEK Femoral TKA Implant Preserve Intact Femoral Surface Strains Compared With CoCr? A Preliminary Laboratory Study.

Rankin KE, Dickinson AS, Briscoe A, Browne M.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Nov;474(11):2405-2413.

14.

Preliminary tribological evaluation of nanostructured diamond coatings against ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene.

Hill MR, Catledge SA, Konovalov V, Clem WC, Chowdhury SA, Etheridge BS, Stanishevsky A, Lemons JE, Vohra YK, Eberhardt AW.

J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008 Apr;85(1):140-8.

15.

Wear Characteristics of Conventional Ultrahigh-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Versus Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

Schipper ON, Haddad SL, Fullam S, Pourzal R, Wimmer MA.

Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Nov;39(11):1335-1344. doi: 10.1177/1071100718786501. Epub 2018 Jul 18.

PMID:
30019605
16.

Comparative in vitro wear testing of PEEK and UHMWPE capped metacarpophalangeal prostheses.

Joyce TJ, Rieker C, Unsworth A.

Biomed Mater Eng. 2006;16(1):1-10.

PMID:
16410639
17.
18.

Wear properties of poly-ether-ether-ketone bearing combinations under zero and cross shear kinematics in total knee arthroplasty.

Chamberlain KA, Rankin KS, Briscoe A, Deehan D, Hyde PJ.

J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019 Feb;107(2):445-453. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34136. Epub 2018 May 7.

PMID:
29732661
19.

Alternative bearings in total knee arthroplasty: risk of early revision compared to traditional bearings: an analysis of 62,177 primary cases.

Inacio MC, Cafri G, Paxton EW, Kurtz SM, Namba RS.

Acta Orthop. 2013 Apr;84(2):145-52. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.784660. Epub 2013 Mar 14.

20.

How has the introduction of new bearing surfaces altered the biological reactions to byproducts of wear and modularity?

Wooley PH.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec;472(12):3699-708. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3725-4. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center