Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 99

1.

Parameters and methods for testing artificial heart valves.

Köhler JC, Tech JG.

Int J Artif Organs. 1989 Apr;12(4):252-60.

PMID:
2722279
2.

[Testing the hydrodynamic properties of heart valve prostheses with a new test apparatus].

Werner S, Wendt MO, Schichl K, Pohl M, Koch B.

Biomed Tech (Berl). 1994 Sep;39(9):204-10. German.

PMID:
7948663
3.

[Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].

Song GM, Zhou JY, Hu SS, Cui JW, Song YH, Tang Y, Zhang Y, Jiang H, Yuan WM, Song XY.

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Jul 29;88(29):2059-63. Chinese.

PMID:
19080436
4.

In vitro evaluation of prosthetic heart valves: towards comparable testing.

Barbaro V, Daniele C, Grigioni M, Palombo A, Sargentini A.

J Med Eng Technol. 1992 Jan-Feb;16(1):10-4.

PMID:
1640442
5.

The influence of ventricular input impedance on the hydrodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic roots in vitro.

Jennings LM, Butterfield M, Walker PG, Watterson KG, Fisher J.

J Heart Valve Dis. 2001 Mar;10(2):269-75.

PMID:
11297215
6.

In vitro evaluation of prosthetic heart valves: anomalies and limitations.

Tindale WB, Black MM, Martin TR.

Clin Phys Physiol Meas. 1982 May;3(2):115-30.

PMID:
7116789
7.

Computer modelling of bioprosthetic heart valves.

Christie GW.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1992;6 Suppl 1:S95-100; discussion S101.

PMID:
1389288
8.

A novel pulse duplicator system: evaluation of different valve prostheses.

Haaf P, Steiner M, Attmann T, Pfister G, Cremer J, Lutter G.

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Feb;57(1):10-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038881. Epub 2009 Jan 23.

PMID:
19169990
9.

A computer controlled versatile pulse duplicator for precision testing of artificial heart valves.

Schichl K, Affeld K.

Int J Artif Organs. 1993 Oct;16(10):722-8.

PMID:
8125620
10.

[In vitro evaluation of hydrodynamics of prosthetic heart valves].

Okude J.

Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1988 Nov;89(11):1893-902. Japanese.

PMID:
3205255
11.

Different tilting disc valves show similar rotation-dependent impairment in hemodynamic performance under a tilted implantation position.

Hartrumpf M, Kuehnel RU, Puchner R, Wendt MO, Pohl M, Albes JM.

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Oct;53(5):274-80.

PMID:
16208612
12.

Where is the common sense in aortic valve replacement? A review of hemodynamics and sizing of stented tissue valves.

Doenst T, Amorim PA, Al-Alam N, Lehmann S, Mukherjee C, Faerber G.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Nov;142(5):1180-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.05.007. Epub 2011 Jun 24. Review.

13.

Hemodynamics of the Edwards Sapien XT transcatheter heart valve in noncircular aortic annuli.

Scharfschwerdt M, Meyer-Saraei R, Schmidtke C, Sievers HH.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jul;148(1):126-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.07.057. Epub 2013 Sep 23.

14.

Fluid dynamics of the CarboMedics kinetic bileaflet prosthetic heart valve.

Baldwin JT, Campbell A, Luck C, Ogilvie W, Sauter J.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997 Feb;11(2):287-92.

PMID:
9080157
15.
16.

A statistical approach to the quantitative comparison of pulsatile flow in vitro data of prosthetic heart valve testing.

Barbaro V, Grigioni M, Daniele C, Boccanera G.

J Heart Valve Dis. 1997 Jan;6(1):93-100.

PMID:
9044088
18.

Hemodynamics of high-performance bileaflet valves: comparison to simulated clinical Doppler measurements.

Dohmen G, Schmitz C, Schmitz-Rode T, Steinseifer U, Autschbach R.

J Heart Valve Dis. 2006 Jul;15(4):549-56.

PMID:
16901053
19.

Comparative hydrodynamic evaluation of bioprosthetic heart valves.

Marquez S, Hon RT, Yoganathan AP.

J Heart Valve Dis. 2001 Nov;10(6):802-11.

PMID:
11767190
20.

Hydrodynamic function of tilting disc prostheses and bileaflet valves in double valve replacement.

Strüber M, Campbell A, Richard G, Laas J.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1996;10(6):422-7.

PMID:
8817137

Supplemental Content

Support Center