Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 139

1.

A longitudinal study of independent scholar-published open access journals.

Björk BC, Shen C, Laakso M.

PeerJ. 2016 May 10;4:e1990. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1990. eCollection 2016.

2.

A study of innovative features in scholarly open access journals.

Björk BC.

J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 16;13(4):e115. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1802.

3.

Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact.

Björk BC, Solomon D.

BMC Med. 2012 Jul 17;10:73. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-73.

4.

Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure.

Laakso M, Björk BC.

BMC Med. 2012 Oct 22;10:124. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-124.

5.

Article processing charges for open access publication-the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada.

Solomon D, Björk BC.

PeerJ. 2016 Jul 21;4:e2264. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2264. eCollection 2016.

6.

'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.

Shen C, Björk BC.

BMC Med. 2015 Oct 1;13:230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.

7.

Open access publishing: a study of current practices in orthopaedic research.

Sabharwal S, Patel N, Johal K.

Int Orthop. 2014 Jun;38(6):1297-302. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2250-5. Epub 2014 Jan 3. Review.

8.

Where on earth to publish? A sample survey comparing traditional and open access publishing in the oncological field.

Poltronieri E, Bravo E, Camerini T, Ferri M, Rizzo R, Solimini R, Cognetti G.

J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Jan 22;32:4. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-32-4.

9.

Open access to scientific articles: a review of benefits and challenges.

Björk BC.

Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;12(2):247-253. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1603-2. Epub 2017 Jan 18.

PMID:
28101848
10.

Growth of hybrid open access, 2009-2016.

Björk BC.

PeerJ. 2017 Sep 29;5:e3878. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3878. eCollection 2017.

11.

The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009.

Laakso M, Welling P, Bukvova H, Nyman L, Björk BC, Hedlund T.

PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020961. Epub 2011 Jun 13.

12.

Authorial and institutional stratification in open access publishing: the case of global health research.

Siler K, Haustein S, Smith E, Larivière V, Alperin JP.

PeerJ. 2018 Feb 19;6:e4269. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4269. eCollection 2018.

13.

Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals.

Beall J.

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Feb;98(2):77-9. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0056.

14.

Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006-2017.

Björk BC.

PeerJ. 2018 Feb 9;6:e4357. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4357. eCollection 2018.

15.

In ... and out: open access publishing in scientific journals.

Boumil MM, Salem DN.

Qual Manag Health Care. 2014 Jul-Sep;23(3):133-7. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000035.

PMID:
24978162
16.

Open Access Publishing in the Electronic Age.

Kovács GL.

EJIFCC. 2014 Oct 24;25(3):252-8. eCollection 2014 Oct.

17.

A survey of authors publishing in four megajournals.

Solomon DJ.

PeerJ. 2014 Apr 22;2:e365. doi: 10.7717/peerj.365. eCollection 2014.

18.

Predatory Open Access in Rehabilitation.

Manca A, Martinez G, Cugusi L, Dragone D, Mercuro G, Deriu F.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 May;98(5):1051-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 20.

PMID:
28115073
19.

Status of open access in the biomedical field in 2005.

Matsubayashi M, Kurata K, Sakai Y, Morioka T, Kato S, Mine S, Ueda S.

J Med Libr Assoc. 2009 Jan;97(1):4-11. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.1.002.

20.

Selecting An Open Access Journal for Publication: Be Cautious

Hoffecker L, Hastings-Tolsma M, Vincent D, Zuniga H.

Online J Issues Nurs. 2015 Dec 4;21(1):8.

Supplemental Content

Support Center