Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 71

1.

Reminder to deposit DNA sequences.

Blaxter M, Danchin A, Savakis B, Fukami-Kobayashi K, Kurokawa K, Sugano S, Roberts RJ, Salzberg SL, Wu CI.

Science. 2016 May 13;352(6287):780. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7672. Epub 2016 May 11. No abstract available.

PMID:
27169596
2.

Databases: Reminder to deposit DNA sequences.

Salzberg SL.

Nature. 2016 May 12;533(7602):179. doi: 10.1038/533179a. No abstract available.

PMID:
27172038
3.

The way you say it.

[No authors listed]

Nat Methods. 2013 Oct;10(10):917. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2686. No abstract available.

PMID:
24161967
4.

A naturally logical representation for DNA primary sequences.

Li C, Wang J.

Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2007 May;10(4):277-81.

PMID:
17506711
5.

Erroneous claims about the impact of mitochondrial DNA sequence database errors.

Helgason A, Stefánsson K.

Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Oct;73(4):974-5. No abstract available.

6.

Molecular taxonomy: Species disconnected from DNA sequences.

Uetz P, Garg A.

Nature. 2017 May 24;545(7655):412. doi: 10.1038/545412c. No abstract available.

PMID:
28541320
7.

Bacterial whole-genome sequences: minimal information and strain availability.

Coenye T, Vandamme P.

Microbiology. 2004 Jul;150(Pt 7):2017-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
15256544
8.

Addressing the use of phylogenetics for identification of sequences in error in the SWGDAM mitochondrial DNA database.

Budowle B, Polanskey D, Allard MW, Chakraborty R.

J Forensic Sci. 2004 Nov;49(6):1256-61.

PMID:
15568698
9.

Error reports threaten to unravel databases of mitochondrial DNA.

Dennis C.

Nature. 2003 Feb 20;421(6925):773-4. No abstract available.

PMID:
12594465
10.

Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences based on the generalized pseudo-amino acid composition.

Huang Y, Yang L, Wang T.

J Theor Biol. 2011 Jan 21;269(1):217-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.10.027. Epub 2010 Oct 30.

PMID:
21040733
11.

Use of sibling pairs to determine the familial searching efficiency of forensic databases.

Reid TM, Baird ML, Reid JP, Lee SC, Lee RF.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2008 Sep;2(4):340-2. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.04.008. Epub 2008 Jun 12.

PMID:
19083845
12.

Barcoding in the dark? A critical view of the sufficiency of zoological DNA barcoding databases and a plea for broader integration of taxonomic knowledge.

Kvist S.

Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013 Oct;69(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.05.012. Epub 2013 May 28.

PMID:
23721749
13.

Standardisation of nomenclature for dog mtDNA D-loop: a prerequisite for launching a Canis familiaris database.

Pereira L, Van Asch B, Amorim A.

Forensic Sci Int. 2004 May 10;141(2-3):99-108.

PMID:
15062947
14.

An Eulerian path approach to global multiple alignment for DNA sequences.

Zhang Y, Waterman MS.

J Comput Biol. 2003;10(6):803-19.

PMID:
14980012
15.

Problems in FBI mtDNA database.

Bandelt HJ, Salas A, Bravi C.

Science. 2004 Sep 3;305(5689):1402-4. No abstract available.

PMID:
15353782
16.

DNA data. Proposal to 'Wikify' GenBank meets stiff resistance.

Pennisi E.

Science. 2008 Mar 21;319(5870):1598-9. doi: 10.1126/science.319.5870.1598. No abstract available.

PMID:
18356493
17.

Making national DNA databases safer.

Burnett L.

Lancet. 2003 Nov 22;362(9397):1761-2. No abstract available. Erratum in: Lancet. 2004 Mar 13;363(9412):902.

PMID:
14643131
18.

FBI mtDNA database: a cogent perspective.

Budowle B, Polanskey D.

Science. 2005 Feb 11;307(5711):845-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
15705827
19.

A database of 9-mers from promoter regions of human protein-coding genes.

Bina M, Wyss P, Shah SR.

Methods Mol Biol. 2006;338:129-34.

PMID:
16888355
20.

Righting the wrongs.

Hadley C.

EMBO Rep. 2003 Sep;4(9):829-31. No abstract available.

Supplemental Content

Support Center