Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 188

1.

The importance of surgical margins in prostate cancer.

Sooriakumaran P, Dev HS, Skarecky D, Ahlering T.

J Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;113(3):310-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.24109. Epub 2016 Mar 23. Review.

PMID:
27004601
2.

Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy at a single institution: preoperative and pathologic factors, and the impact of surgeon variability and technique on incidence and location.

Lallas CD, Fashola Y, Den RB, Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F, Calvaresi AE, McCue P, Birbe R, Gomella LG, Trabulsi EJ.

Can J Urol. 2014 Oct;21(5):7479-86.

PMID:
25347375
3.

Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.

Ploussard G, Agamy MA, Alenda O, Allory Y, Mouracade P, Vordos D, Hoznek A, Abbou CC, de la Taille A, Salomon L.

BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1748-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09728.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30.

4.

Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.

De La Roca RL, Da Cunha IW, Bezerra SM, Da Fonseca FP.

Int Braz J Urol. 2014 May-Jun;40(3):306-15. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.03.03.

5.

Site of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Godoy G, Tareen BU, Lepor H.

BJU Int. 2009 Dec;104(11):1610-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08688.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.

6.

Prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy.

Somford DM, van Oort IM, Cosyns JP, Witjes JA, Kiemeney LA, Tombal B.

World J Urol. 2012 Feb;30(1):105-10. doi: 10.1007/s00345-010-0641-4. Epub 2011 Jan 15.

7.

Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence.

O'Neil LM, Walsh S, Cohen RJ, Lee S.

BJU Int. 2015 Oct;116 Suppl 3:42-8. doi: 10.1111/bju.13173. Epub 2015 Jul 27.

8.

Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?

Pfitzenmaier J, Pahernik S, Tremmel T, Haferkamp A, Buse S, Hohenfellner M.

BJU Int. 2008 Nov;102(10):1413-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07791.x. Epub 2008 Jun 4.

9.

Presence or absence of a positive pathological margin outperforms any other margin-associated variable in predicting clinically relevant biochemical recurrence in Gleason 7 prostate cancer.

Huang JG, Pedersen J, Hong MK, Harewood LM, Peters J, Costello AJ, Hovens CM, Corcoran NM.

BJU Int. 2013 May;111(6):921-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11665.x. Epub 2013 Jan 25.

10.

Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy.

Dev HS, Wiklund P, Patel V, Parashar D, Palmer K, Nyberg T, Skarecky D, Neal DE, Ahlering T, Sooriakumaran P.

Urol Oncol. 2015 Mar;33(3):109.e7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Dec 13.

PMID:
25512161
11.

[Propensity score comparison of the various radical surgical techniques for high-risk prostate cancer].

Busch J, Gonzalgo M, Leva N, Ferrari M, Friedersdorff F, Hinz S, Kempkensteffen C, Miller K, Magheli A.

Aktuelle Urol. 2015 Jan;46(1):45-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1395562. Epub 2014 Dec 19. German.

PMID:
25526221
12.

A multinational, multi-institutional study comparing positive surgical margin rates among 22393 open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients.

Sooriakumaran P, Srivastava A, Shariat SF, Stricker PD, Ahlering T, Eden CG, Wiklund PN, Sanchez-Salas R, Mottrie A, Lee D, Neal DE, Ghavamian R, Nyirady P, Nilsson A, Carlsson S, Xylinas E, Loidl W, Seitz C, Schramek P, Roehrborn C, Cathelineau X, Skarecky D, Shaw G, Warren A, Delprado WJ, Haynes AM, Steyerberg E, Roobol MJ, Tewari AK.

Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):450-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.018. Epub 2013 Nov 24.

PMID:
24290695
13.

Prognostic factors identifying biochemical recurrence in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.

Anastasiou I, Tyritzis SI, Adamakis I, Mitropoulos D, Stravodimos KG, Katafigiotis I, Balangas A, Kollias A, Pavlakis K, Constantinides CA.

Int Urol Nephrol. 2011 Sep;43(3):715-20. doi: 10.1007/s11255-010-9859-8. Epub 2010 Oct 30.

PMID:
21053071
14.

Biochemical recurrence rates are similar for pT2-positive surgical margins and pT3a.

Leite KR, Hartmann C, Reis ST, Viana N, Dall'Oglio MF, Sant'Anna AC, Nesrallah A, Nesrallah L, Antunes AA, Camara-Lopes LH, Srougi M.

Int Braz J Urol. 2014 Mar-Apr;40(2):146-53. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.02.03.

15.

Risk factors for biochemical recurrence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon experience.

Tanimoto R, Fashola Y, Scotland KB, Calvaresi AE, Gomella LG, Trabulsi EJ, Lallas CD.

BMC Urol. 2015 Apr 8;15:27. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0024-7.

16.

Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.

Shikanov S, Song J, Royce C, Al-Ahmadie H, Zorn K, Steinberg G, Zagaja G, Shalhav A, Eggener S.

J Urol. 2009 Jul;182(1):139-44. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.139. Epub 2009 May 17.

PMID:
19450829
17.

Reporting positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: time for standardization.

Fontenot PA, Mansour AM.

BJU Int. 2013 Jun;111(8):E290-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11640.x. Epub 2013 Mar 14. Review.

18.

Prostate cancer biochemical recurrence rates after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Ginzburg S, Nevers T, Staff I, Tortora J, Champagne A, Kesler SS, Laudone VP, Wagner JR.

JSLS. 2012 Jul-Sep;16(3):443-50. doi: 10.4293/108680812X13462882736538.

19.

Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Swindle P, Eastham JA, Ohori M, Kattan MW, Wheeler T, Maru N, Slawin K, Scardino PT.

J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):903-7.

PMID:
16093984
20.

Impact of positive surgical margins and their locations after radical prostatectomy: comparison of biochemical recurrence according to risk stratification and surgical modality.

Choo MS, Cho SY, Ko K, Jeong CW, Lee SB, Ku JH, Hong SK, Byun SS, Kwak C, Kim HH, Lee SE, Jeong H.

World J Urol. 2014 Dec;32(6):1401-9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1230-0. Epub 2013 Dec 21.

PMID:
24362883

Supplemental Content

Support Center