Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 114

1.

Diagnostic prediction models for suspected pulmonary embolism: systematic review and independent external validation in primary care.

Hendriksen JM, Geersing GJ, Lucassen WA, Erkens PM, Stoffers HE, van Weert HC, Büller HR, Hoes AW, Moons KG.

BMJ. 2015 Sep 8;351:h4438. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4438. Review.

2.

The original and simplified Wells rules and age-adjusted D-dimer testing to rule out pulmonary embolism: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

van Es N, Kraaijpoel N, Klok FA, Huisman MV, Den Exter PL, Mos IC, Galipienzo J, Büller HR, Bossuyt PM.

J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Apr;15(4):678-684. doi: 10.1111/jth.13630. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

PMID:
28106338
3.

Ruling Out Pulmonary Embolism in Primary Care: Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of "Gestalt" and the Wells Rule.

Hendriksen JM, Lucassen WA, Erkens PM, Stoffers HE, van Weert HC, Büller HR, Hoes AW, Moons KG, Geersing GJ.

Ann Fam Med. 2016 May;14(3):227-34. doi: 10.1370/afm.1930.

4.

Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism: prospective validation of the simplified Geneva score.

Robert-Ebadi H, Mostaguir K, Hovens MM, Kare M, Verschuren F, Girard P, Huisman MV, Moustafa F, Kamphuisen PW, Buller HR, Righini M, Le Gal G.

J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Sep;15(9):1764-1769. doi: 10.1111/jth.13770. Epub 2017 Aug 17.

PMID:
28688113
5.

Performance of 4 clinical decision rules in the diagnostic management of acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort study.

Douma RA, Mos IC, Erkens PM, Nizet TA, Durian MF, Hovens MM, van Houten AA, Hofstee HM, Klok FA, ten Cate H, Ullmann EF, Büller HR, Kamphuisen PW, Huisman MV; Prometheus Study Group.

Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jun 7;154(11):709-18. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-11-201106070-00002.

PMID:
21646554
6.

Safe exclusion of pulmonary embolism using the Wells rule and qualitative D-dimer testing in primary care: prospective cohort study.

Geersing GJ, Erkens PM, Lucassen WA, Büller HR, Cate HT, Hoes AW, Moons KG, Prins MH, Oudega R, van Weert HC, Stoffers HE.

BMJ. 2012 Oct 4;345:e6564. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e6564.

7.

Utility of the simplified Wells and revised Geneva scores to exclude pulmonary embolism in femur fracture patients.

Kim YJ, Choi DH, Lee ES, Ryoo SM, Ahn S, Sohn CH, Seo DW, Lim KS, Kim WY.

Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;35(8):1131-1135. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.03.023. Epub 2017 Mar 14.

PMID:
28390832
8.

Accuracy of the Wells clinical prediction rule for pulmonary embolism in older ambulatory adults.

Schouten HJ, Geersing GJ, Oudega R, van Delden JJ, Moons KG, Koek HL.

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Nov;62(11):2136-41. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13080. Epub 2014 Nov 3.

PMID:
25366538
10.

Values of the Wells and revised Geneva scores combined with D-dimer in diagnosing elderly pulmonary embolism patients.

Guo DJ, Zhao C, Zou YD, Huang XH, Hu JM, Guo L.

Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Apr 20;128(8):1052-7. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.155085.

11.

Comparison of Wells and Revised Geneva Rule to Assess Pretest Probability of Pulmonary Embolism in High-Risk Hospitalized Elderly Adults.

Di Marca S, Cilia C, Campagna A, D'Arrigo G, Abd ElHafeez S, Tripepi G, Puccia G, Pisano M, Mastrosimone G, Terranova V, Cardella A, Buonacera A, Stancanelli B, Zoccali C, Malatino L.

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Jun;63(6):1091-7. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13459. Epub 2015 Jun 1.

PMID:
26032745
12.

Comparison of the revised Geneva score with the Wells rule for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.

Klok FA, Kruisman E, Spaan J, Nijkeuter M, Righini M, Aujesky D, Roy PM, Perrier A, Le Gal G, Huisman MV.

J Thromb Haemost. 2008 Jan;6(1):40-4. Epub 2007 Oct 29.

13.

Qualitative point-of-care D-dimer testing compared with quantitative D-dimer testing in excluding pulmonary embolism in primary care.

Lucassen WA, Erkens PM, Geersing GJ, Büller HR, Moons KG, Stoffers HE, van Weert HC.

J Thromb Haemost. 2015 Jun;13(6):1004-9. doi: 10.1111/jth.12951. Epub 2015 May 9.

14.

Excluding pulmonary embolism in primary care using the Wells-rule in combination with a point-of care D-dimer test: a scenario analysis.

Lucassen WA, Douma RA, Toll DB, Büller HR, van Weert HC.

BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Sep 13;11:64. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-64.

15.

Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study.

Righini M, Van Es J, Den Exter PL, Roy PM, Verschuren F, Ghuysen A, Rutschmann OT, Sanchez O, Jaffrelot M, Trinh-Duc A, Le Gall C, Moustafa F, Principe A, Van Houten AA, Ten Wolde M, Douma RA, Hazelaar G, Erkens PM, Van Kralingen KW, Grootenboers MJ, Durian MF, Cheung YW, Meyer G, Bounameaux H, Huisman MV, Kamphuisen PW, Le Gal G.

JAMA. 2014 Mar 19;311(11):1117-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2135. Erratum in: JAMA. 2014 Apr 23-30;311(16):1694.

16.

Comparison of the unstructured clinician gestalt, the wells score, and the revised Geneva score to estimate pretest probability for suspected pulmonary embolism.

Penaloza A, Verschuren F, Meyer G, Quentin-Georget S, Soulie C, Thys F, Roy PM.

Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Aug;62(2):117-124.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.11.002. Epub 2013 Feb 21.

PMID:
23433653
17.

Are the Wells Score and the Revised Geneva Score valuable for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy?

Touhami O, Marzouk SB, Bennasr L, Touaibia M, Souli I, Felfel MA, Kehila M, Channoufi MB, Magherbi HE.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Feb;221:166-171. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.12.049. Epub 2017 Dec 28.

PMID:
29310042
18.

The combination of four different clinical decision rules and an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off increases the number of patients in whom acute pulmonary embolism can safely be excluded.

van Es J, Mos I, Douma R, Erkens P, Durian M, Nizet T, van Houten A, Hofstee H, ten Cate H, Ullmann E, Büller H, Huisman M, Kamphuisen PW.

Thromb Haemost. 2012 Jan;107(1):167-71. doi: 10.1160/TH11-08-0587. Epub 2011 Nov 10.

PMID:
22072293
19.

Prospective validation of Wells Criteria in the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

Wolf SJ, McCubbin TR, Feldhaus KM, Faragher JP, Adcock DM.

Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Nov;44(5):503-10.

PMID:
15520710
20.

Simplification of the revised Geneva score for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.

Klok FA, Mos IC, Nijkeuter M, Righini M, Perrier A, Le Gal G, Huisman MV.

Arch Intern Med. 2008 Oct 27;168(19):2131-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.19.2131.

PMID:
18955643

Supplemental Content

Support Center