Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 275

1.

Randomized Clinical Trial of Virtual Reality Simulation Training for Transvaginal Gynecologic Ultrasound Skills.

Chao C, Chalouhi GE, Bouhanna P, Ville Y, Dommergues M.

J Ultrasound Med. 2015 Sep;34(9):1663-7. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.14.09063. Epub 2015 Aug 17.

PMID:
26283753
2.

Sustained effect of simulation-based ultrasound training on clinical performance: a randomized trial.

Tolsgaard MG, Ringsted C, Dreisler E, Nørgaard LN, Petersen JH, Madsen ME, Freiesleben NL, Sørensen JL, Tabor A.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;46(3):312-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.14780. Epub 2015 Aug 6.

3.

Validating a standardized laparoscopy curriculum for gynecology residents: a randomized controlled trial.

Shore EM, Grantcharov TP, Husslein H, Shirreff L, Dedy NJ, McDermott CD, Lefebvre GG.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;215(2):204.e1-204.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.037. Epub 2016 Apr 27.

PMID:
27131588
4.

Virtual reality flexible sigmoidoscopy simulator training: impact on resident performance.

Tuggy ML.

J Am Board Fam Pract. 1998 Nov-Dec;11(6):426-33.

PMID:
9875997
5.

Impact of high-fidelity transvaginal ultrasound simulation for radiology on residents' performance and satisfaction.

Ahmad R, Alhashmi G, Ajlan A, Eldeek B.

Acad Radiol. 2015 Feb;22(2):234-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Oct 18.

PMID:
25444893
6.

High acceptability of a newly developed urological practical skills training program.

de Vries AH, van Luijk SJ, Scherpbier AJ, Hendrikx AJ, Koldewijn EL, Wagner C, Schout BM.

BMC Urol. 2015 Sep 4;15:93. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0084-8.

7.

Assessment of performance measures and learning curves for use of a virtual-reality ultrasound simulator in transvaginal ultrasound examination.

Madsen ME, Konge L, Nørgaard LN, Tabor A, Ringsted C, Klemmensen AK, Ottesen B, Tolsgaard MG.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;44(6):693-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.13400. Epub 2014 Nov 9.

8.

Effectiveness of laparoscopic computer simulator versus usage of box trainer for endoscopic surgery training of novices.

Diesen DL, Erhunmwunsee L, Bennett KM, Ben-David K, Yurcisin B, Ceppa EP, Omotosho PA, Perez A, Pryor A.

J Surg Educ. 2011 Jul-Aug;68(4):282-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.02.007. Epub 2011 May 4.

PMID:
21708364
9.

Outcomes of a virtual-reality simulator-training programme on basic surgical skills in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Phé V, Cattarino S, Parra J, Bitker MO, Ambrogi V, Vaessen C, Rouprêt M.

Int J Med Robot. 2017 Jun;13(2). doi: 10.1002/rcs.1740. Epub 2016 Mar 1.

PMID:
26928974
10.

Impact of accreditation training for residents on sonographic quality in gynecologic emergencies.

Popowski T, Huchon C, Fathallah K, Falissard B, Dumont A, Fauconnier A.

J Ultrasound Med. 2015 May;34(5):829-35. doi: 10.7863/ultra.34.5.829.

PMID:
25911716
11.

Porcine cadaver organ or virtual-reality simulation training for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, controlled trial.

Van Bruwaene S, Schijven MP, Napolitano D, De Win G, Miserez M.

J Surg Educ. 2015 May-Jun;72(3):483-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.11.015. Epub 2014 Dec 30.

PMID:
25555673
12.

Robotic virtual reality simulation plus standard robotic orientation versus standard robotic orientation alone: a randomized controlled trial.

Vaccaro CM, Crisp CC, Fellner AN, Jackson C, Kleeman SD, Pavelka J.

Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013 Sep-Oct;19(5):266-70. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182a09101.

PMID:
23982574
13.

Simulation-based training for thoracoscopic lobectomy: a randomized controlled trial: virtual-reality versus black-box simulation.

Jensen K, Ringsted C, Hansen HJ, Petersen RH, Konge L.

Surg Endosc. 2014 Jun;28(6):1821-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3392-7. Epub 2014 Jan 18.

PMID:
24442678
14.

The Effects of Simulation-based Transvaginal Ultrasound Training on Quality and Efficiency of Care: A Multicenter Single-blind Randomized Trial.

Tolsgaard MG, Ringsted C, Rosthøj S, Nørgaard L, Møller L, Freiesleben NC, Dyre L, Tabor A.

Ann Surg. 2017 Mar;265(3):630-637. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001656.

PMID:
28169932
15.

Hysteroscopic resection on virtual reality simulator: What do we measure?

Panel P, Neveu ME, Villain C, Debras F, Fernandez H, Debras E.

J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018 Jun;47(6):247-252. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Mar 3.

PMID:
29510269
16.

Simulator Based Obstetric Ultrasound Training: A Prospective, Randomized Single-Blinded Study.

Rosen H, Windrim R, Lee YM, Gotha L, Perelman V, Ronzoni S.

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 Mar;39(3):166-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.10.009.

PMID:
28343558
17.

Fundamentals of neurosurgery: virtual reality tasks for training and evaluation of technical skills.

Choudhury N, Gélinas-Phaneuf N, Delorme S, Del Maestro R.

World Neurosurg. 2013 Nov;80(5):e9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.08.022. Epub 2012 Nov 23.

PMID:
23178917
18.

Training Surgical Residents With a Haptic Robotic Central Venous Catheterization Simulator.

Pepley DF, Gordon AB, Yovanoff MA, Mirkin KA, Miller SR, Han DC, Moore JZ.

J Surg Educ. 2017 Nov - Dec;74(6):1066-1073. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 20.

19.

Validation of a Novel Virtual Reality Training Curriculum for Robotic Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Trial.

Valdis M, Chu MW, Schlachta CM, Kiaii B.

Innovations (Phila). 2015 Nov-Dec;10(6):383-8. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000222.

PMID:
26680752
20.

Development and evaluation of methodologies for teaching focused cardiac ultrasound skills to medical students.

Cawthorn TR, Nickel C, O'Reilly M, Kafka H, Tam JW, Jackson LC, Sanfilippo AJ, Johri AM.

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014 Mar;27(3):302-9. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Jan 13.

PMID:
24433979

Supplemental Content

Support Center