Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 131

1.

Angle of fetal head progression measured using transperineal ultrasound as a predictive factor of vacuum extraction failure.

Bultez T, Quibel T, Bouhanna P, Popowski T, Resche-Rigon M, Rozenberg P.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;48(1):86-91. doi: 10.1002/uog.14951. Epub 2016 Jun 10.

2.

Utility of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound to predict cases of failure in vacuum extraction attempt and need of cesarean section to complete delivery.

Sainz JA, Borrero C, Aquise A, Serrano R, Gutiérrez L, Fernández-Palacín A.

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(8):1348-52. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1048680. Epub 2015 Jun 3.

PMID:
26037726
3.

Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound used to predict cases of complicated operative (vacuum and forceps) deliveries in nulliparous women.

Sainz JA, García-Mejido JA, Aquise A, Bonomi MJ, Borrero C, De La Fuente P, Fernández-Palacín A.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Dec;96(12):1490-1497. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13230.

PMID:
28889406
4.

Can angle of progression in pregnant women before onset of labor predict mode of delivery?

Levy R, Zaks S, Ben-Arie A, Perlman S, Hagay Z, Vaisbuch E.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;40(3):332-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.11195.

5.

Transperineal sonographic assessment of angle of progression as a predictor of successful vaginal delivery following induction of labor.

Gillor M, Vaisbuch E, Zaks S, Barak O, Hagay Z, Levy R.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;49(2):240-245. doi: 10.1002/uog.15931.

6.

Sonographic prediction of outcome of vacuum deliveries: a multicenter, prospective cohort study.

Kahrs BH, Usman S, Ghi T, Youssef A, Torkildsen EA, Lindtjørn E, Østborg TB, Benediktsdottir S, Brooks L, Harmsen L, Romundstad PR, Salvesen KÅ, Lees CC, Eggebø TM.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):69.e1-69.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.009. Epub 2017 Mar 19.

7.

Sonographic prediction of vaginal delivery in prolonged labor: a two-center study.

Eggebø TM, Hassan WA, Salvesen KÅ, Lindtjørn E, Lees CC.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;43(2):195-201. doi: 10.1002/uog.13210. Epub 2013 Dec 22.

8.

Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery by transperineal ultrasound performed just after full cervical dilatation is determined.

Kameyama S, Sato A, Miura H, Kumagai J, Sato N, Shimizu D, Makino K, Terada Y.

J Med Ultrason (2001). 2016 Apr;43(2):243-8. doi: 10.1007/s10396-015-0681-x. Epub 2015 Oct 22.

PMID:
27033869
9.

Prediction of time to delivery by transperineal ultrasound in second stage of labor.

Yonetani N, Yamamoto R, Murata M, Nakajima E, Taguchi T, Ishii K, Mitsuda N.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;49(2):246-251. doi: 10.1002/uog.15944.

10.

Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery.

Ghi T, Maroni E, Youssef A, Morselli-Labate AM, Paccapelo A, Montaguti E, Rizzo N, Pilu G.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;44(1):82-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.13324. Epub 2014 May 28.

11.

Intrapartum translabial ultrasound with pushing used to predict the difficulty in vacuum-assisted delivery of fetuses in non-occiput posterior position.

Antonio Sainz J, Borrero C, Aquise A, García-Mejido JA, Gutierrez L, Fernández-Palacín A.

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Oct;29(20):3400-5. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1130816. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

PMID:
26653174
12.

Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound as a predictor of instrumentation difficulty with vacuum-assisted delivery in primiparous women.

Sainz JA, Borrero C, Fernández-Palacín A, Aquise A, Valdivieso P, Pastor L, Garrido R.

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(17):2041-7. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.976547. Epub 2014 Nov 7.

PMID:
25327175
13.

A Simple Model to Predict the Complicated Operative Vaginal Deliveries Using Vacuum or Forceps.

Sainz JA, García-Mejido JA, Aquise A, Borrero C, Bonomi MJ, Fernández-Palacín A.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct 31. pii: S0002-9378(18)30942-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.035. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30391443
14.

Time remaining in labor and probability of vaginal delivery as a function of the angle of progression in a low risk population with a normal first stage of labor. In-house observational study and comparison with the data in the literature.

Masturzo B, Piazzese A, Paracchini S, Quezada MS, Todros T, Farina A.

Minerva Ginecol. 2018 Feb;70(1):35-43. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04091-6. Epub 2017 Jun 7.

PMID:
28590104
15.

Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor.

Torkildsen EA, Salvesen KÅ, Eggebø TM.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun;37(6):702-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.8951. Epub 2011 May 3.

16.

Fetal head-symphysis distance and mode of delivery in the second stage of labor.

Youssef A, Maroni E, Cariello L, Bellussi F, Montaguti E, Salsi G, Morselli-Labate AM, Paccapelo A, Rizzo N, Pilu G, Ghi T.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Oct;93(10):1011-7. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12454. Epub 2014 Aug 13.

PMID:
25040777
17.

Predicting the difficulty of operative vaginal delivery by ultrasound measurement of fetal head station.

Kasbaoui S, Séverac F, Aïssi G, Gaudineau A, Lecointre L, Akladios C, Favre R, Langer B, Sananès N.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;216(5):507.e1-507.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Jan 30.

PMID:
28153664
18.

Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the 'angle of progression' predict the mode of delivery?

Kalache KD, Dückelmann AM, Michaelis SA, Lange J, Cichon G, Dudenhausen JW.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;33(3):326-30. doi: 10.1002/uog.6294.

19.

Re: Angle of fetal head progression measured using transperineal ultrasound as a predictive factor of vacuum extraction failure.

Tutschek B, Braun T, Chantraine F, Henrich W.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;48(5):668-669. doi: 10.1002/uog.17313. No abstract available.

20.

Intra and interobserver variability of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound measurements with contraction and pushing.

Sainz JA, Fernández-Palacín A, Borrero C, Aquise A, Ramos Z, García-Mejido JA.

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Apr;38(3):333-338. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1354179. Epub 2017 Oct 12.

PMID:
29022481

Supplemental Content

Support Center