Similar articles for PMID: 25743455

Year	Number of Results
1946	1
1956	1
1978	1
1987	1
1989	1
1990	1
1992	5
1993	4
1994	3
1996	5
1997	6
1998	2
1999	2
2000	8
2001	11
2002	13
2003	7
2004	11
2005	6
2006	7
2007	7
2008	7
2009	7
2010	7
2011	6
2012	11
2013	13
2014	23
2015	19
2016	10
2017	12
2018	11
2019	14
2020	17
2021	17
2022	10
2023	1
2024	0

1

Risk factors and populations at risk: selection of patients for screening for Barrett's oesophagus.

Rubenstein JH, Thrift AP. Rubenstein JH, et al. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;29(1):41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2014.11.009. Epub 2014 Dec 3. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 25743455 Review.

2

Barrett's oesophagus: Current controversies.

Amadi C, Gatenby P. Amadi C, et al. World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul 28;23(28):5051-5067. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i28.5051. World J Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 28811703 Free PMC article. Review.

3

Reflux, Barrett's oesophagus and adenocarcinoma: burning questions.

Wild CP, Hardie LJ. Wild CP, et al. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003 Sep;3(9):676-84. doi: 10.1038/nrc1166. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003. PMID: 12951586 Review.

4

Cost considerations in implementing a screening and surveillance strategy for Barrett's oesophagus.

Inadomi JM. Inadomi JM. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;29(1):51-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2014.12.002. Epub 2014 Dec 18. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 25743456 Review.

5

Are screening and surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus really worthwhile?

Sharma P, Sidorenko EI. Sharma P, et al. Gut. 2005 Mar;54 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i27-32. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.041566. Gut. 2005. PMID: 15711005 Free PMC article. Review.

6

The Munich Barrett follow up study: suspicion of Barrett's oesophagus based on either endoscopy or histology only--what is the clinical significance?

Meining A, Ott R, Becker I, Hahn S, Mühlen J, Werner M, Höfler H, Classen M, Heldwein W, Rösch T. Meining A, et al. Gut. 2004 Oct;53(10):1402-7. doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.036822. Gut. 2004. PMID: 15361485 Free PMC article.

7

Barrett's oesophagus: can meaningful screening and surveillance guidelines be formulated based on new data and rejigging the old paradigm?

Rajendra S. Rajendra S. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;29(1):65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Dec 3. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 25743457 Review.

8

[Surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus: worthwhile?].

Kastelein F, Kuipers EJ. Kastelein F, et al. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2012;156(49):A5497. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2012. PMID: 23218039 Dutch.

9

Malignant Barrett's oesophagus.

Li H. Li H. Eur J Cancer Prev. 1993 Jan;2(1):47-52. doi: 10.1097/00008469-199301000-00008. Eur J Cancer Prev. 1993. PMID: 8428176 Review.

10

Barrett's oesophagus: optimal strategies for prevention and treatment.

Fass R, Sampliner RE. Fass R, et al. Drugs. 2003;63(6):555-64. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363060-00003. Drugs. 2003. PMID: 12656653 Review.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

258 results

Results by year