Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 159

1.

Sensory irritation as a basis for setting occupational exposure limits.

Brüning T, Bartsch R, Bolt HM, Desel H, Drexler H, Gundert-Remy U, Hartwig A, Jäckh R, Leibold E, Pallapies D, Rettenmeier AW, Schlüter G, Stropp G, Sucker K, Triebig G, Westphal G, van Thriel C.

Arch Toxicol. 2014 Oct;88(10):1855-79. doi: 10.1007/s00204-014-1346-z. Epub 2014 Sep 3. Review.

2.

Local effects in the respiratory tract: relevance of subjectively measured irritation for setting occupational exposure limits.

Arts JH, de Heer C, Woutersen RA.

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006 Apr;79(4):283-98. Epub 2005 Nov 8. Review.

PMID:
16283365
3.

Evaluation of airborne sensory irritants for setting exposure limits or guidelines: A systematic approach.

Nielsen GD, Wolkoff P.

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017 Nov;90:308-317. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Sep 12. Review.

4.

Inhaled formaldehyde: evaluation of sensory irritation in relation to carcinogenicity.

Arts JH, Rennen MA, de Heer C.

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006 Mar;44(2):144-60. Epub 2006 Jan 18. Review.

PMID:
16413643
5.

Evaluation of the sensory irritation test for the assessment of occupational health risk.

Bos PM, Zwart A, Reuzel PG, Bragt PC.

Crit Rev Toxicol. 1991;21(6):423-50. Review.

PMID:
1801847
6.
7.

A proposed approach for setting occupational exposure limits for sensory irritants based on chemosensory models.

Gaffney SH, Paustenbach DJ.

Ann Occup Hyg. 2007 Jun;51(4):345-56. Epub 2007 Jun 30.

PMID:
17602208
8.

Setting an indoor air exposure limit for formaldehyde: factors of concern.

Arts JH, Muijser H, Kuper CF, Woutersen RA.

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Nov;52(2):189-94. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.08.009. Epub 2008 Aug 26.

PMID:
18786592
9.

The use of noncancer endpoints as a basis for establishing a reference concentration for formaldehyde.

Bender J.

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2002 Feb;35(1):23-31. Review.

PMID:
11846633
10.

Perceived odor and irritation of isopropanol: a comparison between naïve controls and occupationally exposed workers.

Smeets M, Dalton P.

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2002 Oct;75(8):541-8. Epub 2002 Aug 16.

PMID:
12373316
11.
12.

Hypothesis-based weight-of-evidence evaluation of methyl methacrylate olfactory effects in humans and derivation of an occupational exposure level.

Pemberton M, Bailey LA, Rhomberg LR.

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2013 Jul;66(2):217-33. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 Apr 11.

13.

Odor, irritation and perception of health risk.

Dalton P.

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2002 Jun;75(5):283-90. Epub 2002 Mar 19.

PMID:
11981666
14.

Formaldehyde and chemosensory irritation in humans: a controlled human exposure study.

Lang I, Bruckner T, Triebig G.

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Feb;50(1):23-36. Epub 2007 Sep 5.

PMID:
17942205
15.

Assessment of upper respiratory tract and ocular irritative effects of volatile chemicals in humans.

Doty RL, Cometto-Muñiz JE, Jalowayski AA, Dalton P, Kendal-Reed M, Hodgson M.

Crit Rev Toxicol. 2004 Mar-Apr;34(2):85-142. Review.

16.
17.

Setting occupational exposure limits in humans: contributions from the field of experimental psychology.

Smeets MA, Kroeze JH, Dalton PH.

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006 Apr;79(4):299-307. Epub 2005 Oct 20. Review.

PMID:
16237552
18.

An analysis of human response to the irritancy of acetone vapors.

Arts JH, Mojet J, van Gemert LJ, Emmen HH, Lammers JH, Marquart J, Woutersen RA, Feron VJ.

Crit Rev Toxicol. 2002 Jan;32(1):43-66. Review.

PMID:
11852913
19.

Health risks associated with inhaled nasal toxicants.

Feron VJ, Arts JH, Kuper CF, Slootweg PJ, Woutersen RA.

Crit Rev Toxicol. 2001 May;31(3):313-47. Review.

PMID:
11405443
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center