Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 83

1.

Predictive factors relating to prognosis of anterior decompressive surgery for proximal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy.

Kong LD, Wang LF, Zhang JT, Zhang YZ, Ding WY, Shen Y.

J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2015;28(2):261-6. doi: 10.3233/BMR-140513.

PMID:
25096308
2.

Anterior and posterior decompressive surgery for progressive amyotrophy associated with cervical spondylosis: a retrospective study of 51 patients.

Uchida K, Nakajima H, Yayama T, Sato R, Kobayashi S, Kokubo Y, Mwaka ES, Baba H.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Sep;11(3):330-7. doi: 10.3171/2009.3.SPINE08635.

PMID:
19769515
3.

Characteristics and surgical results of the distal type of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy.

Tauchi R, Imagama S, Inoh H, Yukawa Y, Kanemura T, Sato K, Sakai Y, Kamiya M, Yoshihara H, Ito Z, Ando K, Muramoto A, Matsui H, Matsumoto T, Ukai J, Kobayashi K, Shinjo R, Nakashima H, Morozumi M, Ishiguro N.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Sep;21(3):411-6. doi: 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE13681. Epub 2014 Jun 13.

PMID:
24926935
4.

The evolution of T2-weighted intramedullary signal changes following ventral decompressive surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Clinical article.

Sarkar S, Turel MK, Jacob KS, Chacko AG.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):538-46. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE13727. Epub 2014 Jul 11.

PMID:
25014501
5.

Magnetic resonance T2 image signal intensity ratio and clinical manifestation predict prognosis after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Zhang YZ, Shen Y, Wang LF, Ding WY, Xu JX, He J.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 May 1;35(10):E396-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c6dbc4.

PMID:
20393392
7.

Prognostic value of changes in spinal cord signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy.

Uchida K, Nakajima H, Takeura N, Yayama T, Guerrero AR, Yoshida A, Sakamoto T, Honjoh K, Baba H.

Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1601-10. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.038. Epub 2013 Oct 18.

PMID:
24411833
8.

Effect of intramedullary signal changes on the surgical outcome of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Suri A, Chabbra RP, Mehta VS, Gaikwad S, Pandey RM.

Spine J. 2003 Jan-Feb;3(1):33-45.

PMID:
14589243
9.

Appropriate timing of surgical intervention for the proximal type of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy.

Tauchi R, Imagama S, Inoh H, Yukawa Y, Kanemura T, Sato K, Matsubara Y, Harada A, Sakai Y, Hachiya Y, Kamiya M, Yoshihara H, Ito Z, Ando K, Hirano K, Muramoto A, Matsui H, Matsumoto T, Ukai J, Kobayashi K, Shinjo R, Nakashima H, Ishiguro N.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jul;25 Suppl 1:S107-13. doi: 10.1007/s00590-014-1504-2. Epub 2014 Jul 5.

PMID:
24996403
10.

Comparison of prognostic value of different MRI classifications of signal intensity change in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Avadhani A, Rajasekaran S, Shetty AP.

Spine J. 2010 Jun;10(6):475-85. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.03.024.

PMID:
20494809
11.

Long-term surgical outcome and risk factors in patients with cervical myelopathy and a change in signal intensity of intramedullary spinal cord on Magnetic Resonance imaging.

Yagi M, Ninomiya K, Kihara M, Horiuchi Y.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Jan;12(1):59-65. doi: 10.3171/2009.5.SPINE08940.

PMID:
20043766
12.

Prediction of surgical outcome for proximal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy novel mode of assessment using compound action potentials of deltoid and biceps brachii and central motor conduction time.

Imajo Y, Kato Y, Kanchiku T, Suzuki H, Yoshida Y, Funaba M, Taguchi T.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Nov 1;37(23):E1444-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826e2ead.

PMID:
22895483
13.

Minimum invasive posterior decompression for cervical spondylotic amyotrophy.

Takebayashi T, Yoshimoto M, Ida K, Tsuda H, Terashima Y, Yamashita T.

J Orthop Sci. 2013 Mar;18(2):205-7. doi: 10.1007/s00776-012-0330-9. Epub 2012 Oct 25.

PMID:
23096953
14.

Pathology and prognosis of proximal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: new assessment using compound muscle action potentials of deltoid and biceps brachii muscles.

Imajo Y, Kato Y, Kanchiku T, Suzuki H, Taguchi T.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Apr 1;36(7):E476-81. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e08d93.

PMID:
21217441
15.

Surgical outcome of posterior decompression for cervical spondylosis with unilateral upper extremity amyotrophy.

Fujiwara Y, Tanaka N, Fujimoto Y, Nakanishi K, Kamei N, Ochi M.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Sep 15;31(20):E728-32.

PMID:
16985439
16.

[Anterior revision surgery for the treatment of cervical spondylosis after anterior decompression and titanium mesh fusion].

Chen BH, Gu SR, Zhang M, Sang PM, Li J.

Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2014 Feb;27(2):132-6. Chinese.

PMID:
24826477
17.

[Surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy].

Liu XY, Li CD, Yi XD, Li H, Yu ZR.

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2007 Dec 18;87(47):3339-42. Chinese.

PMID:
18478947
18.

Anterior decompression in the management of unilateral cervical spondylotic amyotrophy.

Zhang JT, Yang DL, Shen Y, Zhang YZ, Wang LF, Ding WY.

Orthopedics. 2012 Dec;35(12):e1792-7. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20121120-26.

PMID:
23218638
19.

Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy treated by anterior decompression. Three case reports.

Mori K, Yamamoto T, Nakao Y, Maeda M.

Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2006 Jul;46(7):366-70.

20.

Increased flow signal in compressed segments of the spinal cord in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Chang HS, Nejo T, Yoshida S, Oya S, Matsui T.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Dec 15;39(26):2136-42. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000607.

PMID:
25271503

Supplemental Content

Support Center