Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 102

1.

Comparison of aviary, barn and conventional cage raising of chickens on laying performance and egg quality.

Ahammed M, Chae BJ, Lohakare J, Keohavong B, Lee MH, Lee SJ, Kim DM, Lee JY, Ohh SJ.

Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2014 Aug;27(8):1196-203. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13394.

2.

Influence of toe-clipping and stocking density on laying hen performance.

Goodling AC, Satterlee DG, Cerniglia GJ, Jacobs-Perry LA.

Poult Sci. 1984 Sep;63(9):1722-31.

PMID:
6483737
3.

Impact of commercial housing systems and nutrient and energy intake on laying hen performance and egg quality parameters.

Karcher DM, Jones DR, Abdo Z, Zhao Y, Shepherd TA, Xin H.

Poult Sci. 2015 Mar;94(3):485-501. doi: 10.3382/ps/peu078. Epub 2015 Jan 28.

4.

Production performance, use of nest box, and external appearance of two strains of laying hens kept in conventional and enriched cages.

Onbaşılar EE, Ünal N, Erdem E, Kocakaya A, Yaranoğlu B.

Poult Sci. 2015 Apr;94(4):559-64. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev009. Epub 2015 Feb 9.

PMID:
25667426
5.

Nutrient flow and distribution in conventional cage, enriched colony, and aviary layer houses.

Lin XJ, Zhang R, Jiang S, Elmashad HM, Mitloehner F.

Poult Sci. 2016 Jan;95(1):213-24. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev307. Epub 2015 Dec 1.

PMID:
26628346
6.

Effects of rearing systems on performance, egg characteristics and immune response in two layer hen genotype.

Küçükyılmaz K, Bozkurt M, Herken EN, Cınar M, Catlı AU, Bintaş E, Cöven F.

Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2012 Apr;25(4):559-68. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2011.11382.

7.

Housing conditions alter properties of the tibia and humerus during the laying phase in Lohmann white Leghorn hens.

Regmi P, Smith N, Nelson N, Haut RC, Orth MW, Karcher DM.

Poult Sci. 2016 Jan;95(1):198-206. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev209. Epub 2015 Oct 13.

PMID:
26467011
9.

The utilization of the Welfare Quality® assessment for determining laying hen condition across three housing systems.

Blatchford RA, Fulton RM, Mench JA.

Poult Sci. 2016 Jan;95(1):154-63. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev227. Epub 2015 Aug 3.

PMID:
26240396
10.

Environmental assessment of three egg production systems--Part II. Ammonia, greenhouse gas, and particulate matter emissions.

Shepherd TA, Zhao Y, Li H, Stinn JP, Hayes MD, Xin H.

Poult Sci. 2015 Mar;94(3):534-43. doi: 10.3382/ps/peu075.

11.

Effects of housing system on the costs of commercial egg production.

Matthews WA, Sumner DA.

Poult Sci. 2015 Mar;94(3):552-7. doi: 10.3382/ps/peu011. Epub 2014 Dec 5.

12.

Production performance and nitrogen flow of Shaver White layers housed in enriched or conventional cage systems.

Neijat M, House JD, Guenter W, Kebreab E.

Poult Sci. 2011 Mar;90(3):543-54. doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-01069.

PMID:
21325224
13.

Calcium and phosphorus dynamics in commercial laying hens housed in conventional or enriched cage systems.

Neijat M, House JD, Guenter W, Kebreab E.

Poult Sci. 2011 Oct;90(10):2383-96. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01401.

PMID:
21934024
14.

Effect of rearing environment on bone growth of pullets.

Regmi P, Deland TS, Steibel JP, Robison CI, Haut RC, Orth MW, Karcher DM.

Poult Sci. 2015 Mar;94(3):502-11. doi: 10.3382/ps/peu041. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

15.

Effect of age of release from light or food restriction on age at sexual maturity and egg production of laying pullets.

Gous RM, Bradford GD, Johnson SA, Morris TR.

Br Poult Sci. 2000 Jul;41(3):263-71.

PMID:
11081419
16.

Effects of amino acids on egg number and egg mass of brown (heavy breed) and white (light breed) laying hens.

Bonekamp RP, Lemme A, Wijtten PJ, Sparla JK.

Poult Sci. 2010 Mar;89(3):522-9. doi: 10.3382/ps.2009-00342.

PMID:
20181869
17.

Performance and welfare of laying hens in conventional and enriched cages.

Tactacan GB, Guenter W, Lewis NJ, Rodriguez-Lecompte JC, House JD.

Poult Sci. 2009 Apr;88(4):698-707. doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00369.

PMID:
19276411
19.

Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens.

Singh R, Cheng KM, Silversides FG.

Poult Sci. 2009 Feb;88(2):256-64. doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00237.

PMID:
19151338
20.

Effects of light intensity from photostimulation in four strains of commercial egg layers: 2. Egg production parameters.

Renema RA, Robinson FE, Feddes JJ, Fasenko GM, Zuidhoft MJ.

Poult Sci. 2001 Aug;80(8):1121-31.

PMID:
11495464

Supplemental Content

Support Center