Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 152

1.

A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.

Phan K, Xie A, Di Eusanio M, Yan TD.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Oct;98(4):1499-511. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.060. Epub 2014 Jul 24.

PMID:
25064516
2.

Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: matched propensity score analysis of 808 patients.

Furukawa N, Kuss O, Aboud A, Schönbrodt M, Renner A, Hakim Meibodi K, Becker T, Zittermann A, Gummert JF, Börgermann J.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Aug;46(2):221-6; discussion 226-7. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt616. Epub 2014 Jan 20.

PMID:
24446478
3.

Is ministernotomy superior to right anterior minithoracotomy in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement?

Balmforth D, Harky A, Lall K, Uppal R.

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Nov 1;25(5):818-821. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx241. Review.

PMID:
29049755
4.

Trainees can learn minimally invasive aortic valve replacement without compromising safety.

Soppa G, Yates M, Viviano A, Smelt J, Valencia O, van Besouw JP, Jahangiri M.

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Apr;20(4):458-62. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu428. Epub 2015 Jan 7.

PMID:
25568258
5.

Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery. A safe and useful technique beyond the cosmetic benefits.

Paredes FA, Cánovas SJ, Gil O, García-Fuster R, Hornero F, Vázquez A, Martín E, Mena A, Martínez-León J.

Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2013 Sep;66(9):695-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2013.02.013. Epub 2013 Jun 13.

PMID:
24773674
6.

Conventional versus minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: pooled analysis of propensity-matched data.

Lim JY, Deo SV, Altarabsheh SE, Jung SH, Erwin PJ, Markowitz AH, Park SJ.

J Card Surg. 2015 Feb;30(2):125-34. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12493. Epub 2014 Dec 22.

PMID:
25533177
7.

Preoperative planning of left-sided valve surgery with 3D computed tomography reconstruction models: sternotomy or a minimally invasive approach?

Heuts S, Maessen JG, Sardari Nia P.

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 May;22(5):587-93. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv408. Epub 2016 Jan 29.

PMID:
26826714
8.

[MINIMALLY INVASIVE AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT].

Tabata M.

Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2016 Mar;117(2):114-9. Japanese.

PMID:
27295772
9.

Reoperative aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians-minimally invasive technique in the era of transcatheter valve replacement.

Kaneko T, Loberman D, Gosev I, Rassam F, McGurk S, Leacche M, Cohn L.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.076. Epub 2013 Nov 1.

10.

Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis.

Dalén M, Biancari F, Rubino AS, Santarpino G, Glaser N, De Praetere H, Kasama K, Juvonen T, Deste W, Pollari F, Meuris B, Fischlein T, Mignosa C, Gatti G, Pappalardo A, Svenarud P, Sartipy U.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jan;49(1):220-7. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv014. Epub 2015 Feb 3.

PMID:
25653252
11.

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through a transverse sternotomy: a word of caution.

Bridgewater B, Steyn RS, Ray S, Hooper T.

Heart. 1998 Jun;79(6):605-7.

12.

V-type mini sternotomy in aortic valve replacement.

Granov N, Kacila M, Mujicic E, Hadzimehmedagic A, Custovic F, Kulic M.

Med Arch. 2012;66(3):213-4.

PMID:
22822629
13.

Does a minimally invasive approach increase the incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement?

Bakir I, Casselman FP, Onan B, Van Praet F, Vermeulen Y, Degrieck I.

J Heart Valve Dis. 2014 Mar;23(2):161-7.

PMID:
25076545
14.

Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Ministernotomy Versus Minithoracotomy Approach.

Hassan M, Miao Y, Maraey A, Lincoln J, Brown S, Windsor J, Ricci M.

J Heart Valve Dis. 2015 Sep;24(5):531-9. Review.

PMID:
26897831
15.

A randomized multicenter trial of minimally invasive rapid deployment versus conventional full sternotomy aortic valve replacement.

Borger MA, Moustafine V, Conradi L, Knosalla C, Richter M, Merk DR, Doenst T, Hammerschmidt R, Treede H, Dohmen P, Strauch JT.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Jan;99(1):17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.09.022. Epub 2014 Nov 20.

PMID:
25441065
16.

[L-shaped Partial Upper Sternotomy Approach for Aortic Valve Replacement].

Munakata H, Oyama N, Murakami Y, Yamazato T, Abe N, Mabuni K, Kugai T.

Kyobu Geka. 2017 Feb;70(2):83-90. Japanese.

PMID:
28174400
17.

Manubrium-limited sternotomy decreases blood loss after aortic valve replacement surgery.

Burdett CL, Lage IB, Goodwin AT, White RW, Khan KJ, Owens WA, Kendall SW, Ferguson JI, Dunning J, Akowuah EF.

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Oct;19(4):605-10. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu196. Epub 2014 Jun 18.

PMID:
24944150
18.

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: Comparison of long-term outcomes.

Ariyaratnam P, Loubani M, Griffin SC.

Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2015 Sep;23(7):814-21. doi: 10.1177/0218492315587606. Epub 2015 May 19.

PMID:
25991010
19.

Outcomes of aortic valve and concomitant ascending aorta replacement performed via a minimally invasive right thoracotomy approach.

LaPietra A, Santana O, Pineda AM, Mihos CG, Lamelas J.

Innovations (Phila). 2014 Sep-Oct;9(5):339-42; discussion 342. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000099.

PMID:
25251550
20.

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to standard AVR.

Liu J, Sidiropoulos A, Konertz W.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 Nov;16 Suppl 2:S80-3.

PMID:
10613563

Supplemental Content

Support Center