Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 129

1.

The clinical correlation of a new practical MRI method for grading cervical neural foraminal stenosis based on oblique sagittal images.

Park HJ, Kim SS, Han CH, Lee SY, Chung EC, Kim MS, Kwon HJ.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Aug;203(2):412-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11647.

PMID:
25055278
2.

Clinical correlation of a new practical MRI method for assessing cervical spinal canal compression.

Park HJ, Kim SS, Chung EC, Lee SY, Park NH, Rho MH, Choi SH.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Aug;199(2):W197-201. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7599.

PMID:
22826421
3.

A practical MRI grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis based on oblique sagittal images.

Park HJ, Kim SS, Lee SY, Park NH, Chung EC, Rho MH, Kwon HJ, Kook SH.

Br J Radiol. 2013 May;86(1025):20120515. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20120515. Epub 2013 Feb 14.

4.

Comparison of two MR grading systems for correlation between grade of cervical neural foraminal stenosis and clinical manifestations.

Lee KH, Park HJ, Lee SY, Chung EC, Rho MH, Shin H, Kwon YJ.

Br J Radiol. 2016 Jun;89(1062):20150971. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150971. Epub 2016 Mar 23.

5.

Interreader Reliability and Clinical Validity of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Grading System for Cervical Foraminal Stenosis.

Lee JE, Park HJ, Lee SY, Lee YT, Kim YB, Lee KH, Shin H, Kwon YJ.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017 Nov/Dec;41(6):926-930. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000628.

PMID:
28481805
6.

Clinical correlation of a new and practical magnetic resonance grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis assessment.

Park HJ, Kim JH, Lee JW, Lee SY, Chung EC, Rho MH, Moon JW.

Acta Radiol. 2015 Jun;56(6):727-32. doi: 10.1177/0284185114537929. Epub 2014 Jul 9.

PMID:
25009277
7.

Clinical correlation of a new MR imaging method for assessing lumbar foraminal stenosis.

Park HJ, Kim SS, Lee SY, Park NH, Rho MH, Hong HP, Kwag HJ, Kook SH, Choi SH.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 May;33(5):818-22. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2870. Epub 2012 Jan 12.

8.

A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis.

Lee S, Lee JW, Yeom JS, Kim KJ, Kim HJ, Chung SK, Kang HS.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Apr;194(4):1095-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2772.

PMID:
20308517
9.

Diagnostic value of oblique magnetic resonance images for evaluating cervical foraminal stenosis.

Park MS, Moon SH, Lee HM, Kim TH, Oh JK, Lee SY, Oh JB, Riew KD.

Spine J. 2015 Apr 1;15(4):607-11. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.10.019. Epub 2014 Oct 22.

PMID:
25452016
10.

Accuracy of contrast-enhanced MDCT and MRI for identifying the severity and cause of neural foraminal stenosis in cervical radiculopathy: a prospective study.

Douglas-Akinwande AC, Rydberg J, Shah MV, Phillips MD, Caldemeyer KS, Lurito JT, Ying J, Mathews VP.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jan;194(1):55-61. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2988.

PMID:
20028905
11.

Clinical correlation of a new practical MRI method for assessing central lumbar spinal stenosis.

Park HJ, Kim SS, Lee YJ, Lee SY, Park NH, Choi YJ, Chung EC, Rho MH.

Br J Radiol. 2013 May;86(1025):20120180. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20120180. Epub 2013 Feb 20.

12.

New MRI grading system for the cervical canal stenosis.

Kang Y, Lee JW, Koh YH, Hur S, Kim SJ, Chai JW, Kang HS.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jul;197(1):W134-40. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5560.

PMID:
21700974
13.

A New MRI Grading System for Cervical Foraminal Stenosis Based on Axial T2-Weighted Images.

Kim S, Lee JW, Chai JW, Yoo HJ, Kang Y, Seo J, Ahn JM, Kang HS.

Korean J Radiol. 2015 Nov-Dec;16(6):1294-302. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1294. Epub 2015 Oct 26.

14.

Comparison of MRI grading for cervical neural foraminal stenosis based on axial and oblique sagittal images: Concordance and reliability study.

Kim W, Ahn KS, Kang CH, Kang WY, Yang KS.

Clin Imaging. 2017 May - Jun;43:165-169. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 15.

PMID:
28334616
15.

C2 nerve root on magnetic resonance imaging of occipital neuralgia.

Yi M, Lee JW, Yeom JS, Joe E, Hong SH, Lee GY, Kang HS.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jun 1;39(13):1077-83. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000345.

PMID:
24732835
16.

A comparison of angled sagittal MRI and conventional MRI in the diagnosis of herniated disc and stenosis in the cervical foramen.

Shim JH, Park CK, Lee JH, Choi JW, Lee DC, Kim DH, Kim JK, Hwang JH.

Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18(8):1109-16. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0932-x. Epub 2009 Mar 18.

17.

Correlation between MRI Grading System and Surgical Findings for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis.

Jeong TS, Ahn Y, Lee SG, Kim WK, Son S, Kwon JH.

J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2017 Jul;60(4):465-470. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2016.1010.004. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

18.

Oblique reformation in cervical spine computed tomography: a new look at an old friend.

Roberts CC, McDaniel NT, Krupinski EA, Erly WK.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jan 15;28(2):167-70.

PMID:
12544934
19.

Reliability of readings of magnetic resonance imaging features of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Tosteson TD, Carragee E, Carrino JA, Kaiser J, Sequeiros RT, Lecomte AR, Grove MR, Blood EA, Pearson LH, Weinstein JN, Herzog R.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jun 15;33(14):1605-10. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181791af3. Erratum in: Spine. 2008 Oct 15;33(22):2482.. Carrino, John [corrected to Carrino, John A].

20.

Comparison of agreement of cervical spine degenerative pathology findings in magnetic resonance imaging studies.

Fu MC, Webb ML, Buerba RA, Neway WE, Brown JE, Trivedi M, Lischuk AW, Haims AH, Grauer JN.

Spine J. 2016 Jan 1;16(1):42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.08.026. Epub 2015 Aug 17.

PMID:
26291398

Supplemental Content

Support Center