Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 225

1.

Comparative evaluation of canal isthmus debridement efficacy of modified EndoVac technique with different irrigation systems.

Thomas AR, Velmurugan N, Smita S, Jothilatha S.

J Endod. 2014 Oct;40(10):1676-80. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.05.014. Epub 2014 Jul 19.

PMID:
25052146
2.

Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study.

Mancini M, Cerroni L, Iorio L, Armellin E, Conte G, Cianconi L.

J Endod. 2013 Nov;39(11):1456-60. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.028. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

PMID:
24139274
3.

Comparison of debris removal with three different irrigation techniques.

Howard RK, Kirkpatrick TC, Rutledge RE, Yaccino JM.

J Endod. 2011 Sep;37(9):1301-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.008. Epub 2011 Jun 25.

PMID:
21846554
4.

Supplementary Steps for Removing Hard Tissue Debris from Isthmus-containing Canal Systems.

Keleş A, Alçin H, Sousa-Neto MD, Versiani MA.

J Endod. 2016 Nov;42(11):1677-1682. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.07.025. Epub 2016 Sep 9.

PMID:
27623498
5.

Canal and isthmus debridement efficacy of the VPro EndoSafe negative-pressure irrigation technique.

Sarno MU, Sidow SJ, Looney SW, Lindsey KW, Niu LN, Tay FR.

J Endod. 2012 Dec;38(12):1631-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.09.002. Epub 2012 Oct 17.

PMID:
23146651
6.
7.

Wall shear stress effects of different endodontic irrigation techniques and systems.

Goode N, Khan S, Eid AA, Niu LN, Gosier J, Susin LF, Pashley DH, Tay FR.

J Dent. 2013 Jul;41(7):636-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 Apr 19.

PMID:
23603086
8.

In vivo efficacy of three different endodontic irrigation systems for irrigant delivery to working length of mesial canals of mandibular molars.

Munoz HR, Camacho-Cuadra K.

J Endod. 2012 Apr;38(4):445-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.007. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

PMID:
22414827
9.

Cleaning efficacy using two engine-driven systems versus manual instrumentation in curved root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study.

Zmener O, Pameijer CH, Alvarez Serrano S, Hernandez SR.

J Endod. 2011 Sep;37(9):1279-82. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.036. Epub 2011 Jul 20.

PMID:
21846548
10.

A comparative study of the debridement efficacy and apical extrusion of dynamic and passive root canal irrigation systems.

Alkahtani A, Al Khudhairi TD, Anil S.

BMC Oral Health. 2014 Feb 11;14:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-12.

11.

Effect of different final irrigation methods on the removal of calcium hydroxide from an artificial standardized groove in the apical third of root canals.

Capar ID, Ozcan E, Arslan H, Ertas H, Aydinbelge HA.

J Endod. 2014 Mar;40(3):451-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.019. Epub 2013 Nov 9.

PMID:
24565670
12.

Comparison of sealer penetration using the EndoVac irrigation system and conventional needle root canal irrigation.

Kara Tuncer A, Unal B.

J Endod. 2014 May;40(5):613-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.11.017. Epub 2014 Jan 7.

PMID:
24767552
13.

Canal and isthmus debridement efficacy using a sonic irrigation technique in a closed-canal system.

Johnson M, Sidow SJ, Looney SW, Lindsey K, Niu LN, Tay FR.

J Endod. 2012 Sep;38(9):1265-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 Jul 20.

PMID:
22892748
14.

Comparison of a continuous ultrasonic irrigation device and conventional needle irrigation in the removal of root canal debris.

Curtis TO, Sedgley CM.

J Endod. 2012 Sep;38(9):1261-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.012. Epub 2012 Jun 30.

PMID:
22892747
15.

Effectiveness of final irrigant protocols for debris removal from simulated canal irregularities.

Martins Justo A, Abreu da Rosa R, Santini MF, Cardoso Ferreira MB, Pereira JR, Húngaro Duarte MA, Reis Só MV.

J Endod. 2014 Dec;40(12):2009-14. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Sep 26.

PMID:
25266470
16.

Cleaning the apical third of curved canals after different irrigation protocols.

Pereira ES, Peixoto IF, Nakagawa RK, Buono VT, Bahia MG.

Braz Dent J. 2012;23(4):351-6.

17.

Spectrophotometric determination of irrigant extrusion using passive ultrasonic irrigation, EndoActivator, or syringe irrigation.

Rodríguez-Figueroa C, McClanahan SB, Bowles WR.

J Endod. 2014 Oct;40(10):1622-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.03.017. Epub 2014 Apr 29.

PMID:
25260734
18.

Comparative Effectiveness of New Mechanical Irrigant Agitating Devices for Debris Removal from the Canal and Isthmus of Mesial Roots of Mandibular Molars.

Duque JA, Duarte MA, Canali LC, Zancan RF, Vivan RR, Bernardes RA, Bramante CM.

J Endod. 2017 Feb;43(2):326-331. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Dec 15.

PMID:
27989584
19.

Micro-Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Hard Tissue Debris Removal after Different Irrigation Methods and Its Influence on the Filling of Curved Canals.

Freire LG, Iglecias EF, Cunha RS, Dos Santos M, Gavini G.

J Endod. 2015 Oct;41(10):1660-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 Jun 18.

PMID:
26093470
20.

Efficacy of the NaviTip FX irrigation needle in removing post instrumentation canal smear layer and debris in curved root canals.

Zmener O, Pameijer CH, Serrano SA, Palo RM, Iglesias EF.

J Endod. 2009 Sep;35(9):1270-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.05.001. Epub 2009 Jun 28.

PMID:
19720229

Supplemental Content

Support Center