Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 284

1.

A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy.

Lönnerfors C, Reynisson P, Persson J.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Jan;22(1):78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Jul 19.

PMID:
25045857
2.

A systematic review and cost analysis of robot-assisted hysterectomy in malignant and benign conditions.

Tapper AM, Hannola M, Zeitlin R, Isojärvi J, Sintonen H, Ikonen TS.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Jun;177:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Mar 15. Review.

PMID:
24703710
3.

Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with traditional hysterectomy for cost-effectiveness to employers.

Lenihan JP Jr, Kovanda C, Cammarano C.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;190(6):1714-20; discussion 1720-2.

PMID:
15284779
4.

A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.

Eklind S, Lindfors A, Sjöli P, Dahm-Kähler P.

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Feb;25(2):250-6. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000357.

PMID:
25611898
5.

Hospital costs of total vaginal hysterectomy compared with other minimally invasive hysterectomy.

Dayaratna S, Goldberg J, Harrington C, Leiby BE, McNeil JM.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;210(2):120.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.028. Epub 2013 Sep 20.

PMID:
24060444
6.

Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies.

Wright KN, Jonsdottir GM, Jorgensen S, Shah N, Einarsson JI.

JSLS. 2012 Oct-Dec;16(4):519-24. doi: 10.4293/108680812X13462882736736.

7.

Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.

Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, Schaer G.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 May;150(1):92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Mar 5.

PMID:
20207063
8.

Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia.

Herling SF, Palle C, Møller AM, Thomsen T, Sørensen J.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Mar;95(3):299-308. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12820. Epub 2015 Dec 16.

PMID:
26575851
9.

A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.

Payne TN, Dauterive FR.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):286-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 6.

PMID:
18439499
10.

Hospital costs for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Reynisson P, Persson J.

Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Jul;130(1):95-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.04.014. Epub 2013 Apr 17.

PMID:
23603368
11.

Surgical outcome and cost comparison between total vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri weighing >500 g.

Cho HY, Park ST, Kim HB, Kang SW, Park SH.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):115-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Aug 6.

PMID:
23932973
12.

The increasing use of robot-assisted approach for hysterectomy results in decreasing rates of abdominal hysterectomy and traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Smorgick N, Patzkowsky KE, Hoffman MR, Advincula AP, Song AH, As-Sanie S.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Jan;289(1):101-5. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2948-z. Epub 2013 Jul 10.

PMID:
23839534
13.

A comparison of quality outcome measures in patients having a hysterectomy for benign disease: robotic vs. non-robotic approaches.

Martino MA, Berger EA, McFetridge JT, Shubella J, Gosciniak G, Wejkszner T, Kainz GF, Patriarco J, Thomas MB, Boulay R.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):389-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.10.008. Epub 2013 Oct 26.

PMID:
24513969
14.

Economic evaluation of robot-assisted hysterectomy: a cost-minimisation analysis.

Teljeur C, O'Neill M, Moran PS, Harrington P, Flattery M, Murphy L, Ryan M.

BJOG. 2014 Nov;121(12):1546-53. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12836. Epub 2014 May 9.

15.

Three methods for hysterectomy: a randomised, prospective study of short term outcome.

Ottosen C, Lingman G, Ottosen L.

BJOG. 2000 Nov;107(11):1380-5.

16.

Laparoscopic and robot-assisted hysterectomy for uterine cancer: a comparison of costs and complications.

Zakhari A, Czuzoj-Shulman N, Spence AR, Gotlieb WH, Abenhaim HA.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;213(5):665.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Jul 15.

PMID:
26188114
17.

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

El-Mowafi D, Madkour W, Lall C, Wenger JM.

J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004 May;11(2):175-80.

PMID:
15200770
18.

Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.

Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, Burke WM, Lu YS, Neugut AI, Herzog TJ, Hershman DL.

JAMA. 2013 Feb 20;309(7):689-98. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.186.

PMID:
23423414
19.

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.

Martínez-Maestre MA, Gambadauro P, González-Cejudo C, Torrejón R.

Surg Innov. 2014 Jun;21(3):250-5. doi: 10.1177/1553350613492023. Epub 2013 Jul 5.

PMID:
23833240
20.

Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care.

Warren L, Ladapo JA, Borah BJ, Gunnarsson CL.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):581-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.06.018.

PMID:
19835801
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk