Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 111

1.

Three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping of the coronary veins during cardiac resynchronization therapy implant: feasibility and possible applications.

Niazi I, Ryu K, Hood R, Choudhuri I, Akhtar M.

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Nov;41(2):147-53. doi: 10.1007/s10840-014-9932-9.

PMID:
25005455
2.

Left ventricular lead placement in the latest activated region guided by coronary venous electroanatomic mapping.

Rad MM, Blaauw Y, Dinh T, Pison L, Crijns HJ, Prinzen FW, Vernooy K.

Europace. 2015 Jan;17(1):84-93. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu221.

3.
4.

Vectorcardiographic QRS area identifies delayed left ventricular lateral wall activation determined by electroanatomic mapping in candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Mafi Rad M, Wijntjens GW, Engels EB, Blaauw Y, Luermans JG, Pison L, Crijns HJ, Prinzen FW, Vernooy K.

Heart Rhythm. 2016 Jan;13(1):217-25. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.07.033.

PMID:
26232766
5.

Three-Dimensional Cardiac Mapping Characterizes Ventricular Contractile Patterns during Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Implant: A Feasibility Study.

Niazi IK, Sperzel J, Heist EK, Rosenberg SP, Ryu K, Yang M, D'Avila A, Singh JP.

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Sep;38(9):1091-8. doi: 10.1111/pace.12674.

PMID:
26096125
6.

Transcoronary mapping of ventricular asynchrony due to left bundle branch block in a porcine model.

Heinroth KM, Unverzagt S, Mahnkopf D, Plehn A, Buerke M, Werdan K, Prondzinsky R.

J Invasive Cardiol. 2014 Oct;26(10):520-6.

7.

Left Ventricular Lead Placement Targeted at the Latest Activated Site Guided by Electrophysiological Mapping in Coronary Sinus Branches Improves Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Liang Y, Yu H, Zhou W, Xu G, Sun YI, Liu R, Wang Z, Han Y.

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 Dec;26(12):1333-9. doi: 10.1111/jce.12771.

PMID:
26249040
8.

Detailed analysis of ventricular activation sequences during right ventricular apical pacing and left bundle branch block and the potential implications for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Eschalier R, Ploux S, Lumens J, Whinnett Z, Varma N, Meillet V, Ritter P, Jaïs P, Haïssaguerre M, Bordachar P.

Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jan;12(1):137-43. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.09.059.

PMID:
25285646
9.
10.

Coronary sinus activation patterns in patients with and without left bundle branch block undergoing electroanatomic mapping system-guided cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation.

Del Greco M, Zorzi A, Di Matteo I, Cima A, Maines M, Angheben C, Catanzariti D.

Heart Rhythm. 2017 Feb;14(2):225-233. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.10.025.

PMID:
27989791
11.

High-density epicardial activation mapping to optimize the site for video-thoracoscopic left ventricular lead implant.

Polasek R, Skalsky I, Wichterle D, Martinca T, Hanuliakova J, Roubicek T, Bahnik J, Jansova H, Pirk J, Kautzner J.

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 Aug;25(8):882-8. doi: 10.1111/jce.12430.

12.

Usefulness of echocardiographically guided left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with intermediate QRS width and non-left bundle branch block morphology.

Marek JJ, Saba S, Onishi T, Ryo K, Schwartzman D, Adelstein EC, Gorcsan J 3rd.

Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jan 1;113(1):107-16. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.09.024.

PMID:
24169014
13.

Acute electrical and hemodynamic effects of multisite left ventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in the dyssynchronous canine heart.

Ploux S, Strik M, van Hunnik A, van Middendorp L, Kuiper M, Prinzen FW.

Heart Rhythm. 2014 Jan;11(1):119-25. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.10.018.

PMID:
24120876
15.

Right and left ventricular activation sequence in patients with heart failure and right bundle branch block: a detailed analysis using three-dimensional non-fluoroscopic electroanatomic mapping system.

Fantoni C, Kawabata M, Massaro R, Regoli F, Raffa S, Arora V, Salerno-Uriarte JA, Klein HU, Auricchio A.

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Feb;16(2):112-9; discussion 120-1.

PMID:
15720446
16.

Site of latest activation in patients eligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy: patterns of dyssynchrony among different QRS configurations and impact of heart failure etiology.

van Bommel RJ, Ypenburg C, Mollema SA, Borleffs CJ, Delgado V, Bertini M, Marsan NA, van der Wall EE, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ.

Am Heart J. 2011 Jun;161(6):1060-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.03.014.

PMID:
21641351
17.

T-wave area predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left bundle branch block.

Engels EB, Végh EM, Van Deursen CJ, Vernooy K, Singh JP, Prinzen FW.

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 Feb;26(2):176-83. doi: 10.1111/jce.12549.

PMID:
25230363
18.

Simultaneous His Bundle and Left Ventricular Pacing for Optimal Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Delivery: Acute Hemodynamic Assessment by Pressure-Volume Loops.

Padeletti L, Pieragnoli P, Ricciardi G, Innocenti L, Checchi L, Padeletti M, Michelucci A, Picariello F, Valsecchi S.

Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016 May;9(5). pii: e003793. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003793.

PMID:
27162032
19.

Transseptal conduction as an important determinant for cardiac resynchronization therapy, as revealed by extensive electrical mapping in the dyssynchronous canine heart.

Strik M, van Deursen CJ, van Middendorp LB, van Hunnik A, Kuiper M, Auricchio A, Prinzen FW.

Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Aug;6(4):682-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.000028.

20.

Underestimation of duration of ventricular activation by 12-lead ECG compared with direct measurement of activation duration derived from implanted pacemaker leads.

Duncan AM, Lim E, Mebrate Y, Wong T, Gibson DG.

Int J Cardiol. 2011 Oct 6;152(1):35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.07.001.

PMID:
20678820
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center