Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 104

1.
2.

Perceptual integration of acoustic cues to laryngeal contrasts in Korean fricatives.

Lee S, Katz J.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Feb;139(2):605-11. doi: 10.1121/1.4926435.

PMID:
26936544
3.

Perceptual susceptibility to acoustic manipulations in speaker discrimination.

Sell G, Suied C, Elhilali M, Shamma S.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Feb;137(2):911-22. doi: 10.1121/1.4906826.

4.

Estimates of decision weights and internal noise in the masked discrimination of vowels by young and elderly adults.

Gilbertson L, Lutfi RA, Lee J.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jun;137(6):EL403-7. doi: 10.1121/1.4919701.

5.

Room and head coloration can induce obligatory stream segregation.

David M, Lavandier M, Grimault N.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Jul;136(1):5-8. doi: 10.1121/1.4883387.

PMID:
24993189
6.

Perception of prosody in normal and whispered French.

Heeren WF, Lorenzi C.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Apr;135(4):2026-40. doi: 10.1121/1.4868359.

PMID:
25235001
7.

Vocalic correlates of pitch in whispered versus normal speech.

Heeren WF.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Dec;138(6):3800-10. doi: 10.1121/1.4937762.

PMID:
26723334
8.

Cross-language perceptual similarity predicts categorial discrimination of American vowels by naïve Japanese listeners.

Strange W, Hisagi M, Akahane-Yamada R, Kubo R.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Oct;130(4):EL226-31. doi: 10.1121/1.3630221.

9.

Psychometric properties associated with perceived vocal roughness using a matching task.

Eddins DA, Shrivastav R.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Oct;134(4):EL294-300. doi: 10.1121/1.4819183.

10.

Evidence for language transfer leading to a perceptual advantage for non-native listeners.

Chang CB, Mishler A.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Oct;132(4):2700-10. doi: 10.1121/1.4747615.

PMID:
23039462
11.

Cue-weighting in the perception of intervocalic stop voicing in European Portuguese.

Pape D, Jesus LM.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Sep;136(3):1334. doi: 10.1121/1.4890639.

PMID:
25190406
12.

Clarity in communication: "clear" speech authenticity and lexical neighborhood density effects in speech production and perception.

Scarborough R, Zellou G.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Nov;134(5):3793-807. doi: 10.1121/1.4824120.

PMID:
24180789
13.

The effect of context duration on Mandarin listeners' tone normalization.

Luo X, Ashmore KB.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Aug;136(2):EL109-15. doi: 10.1121/1.4885483.

14.

The time course of perception of coarticulation.

Beddor PS, McGowan KB, Boland JE, Coetzee AW, Brasher A.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Apr;133(4):2350-66. doi: 10.1121/1.4794366.

PMID:
23556601
15.

Perception and production of English stops by tonal and non-tonal Korean dialect speakers.

Choi TH, Kim GH, Han JI.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Dec;134(6):EL541. doi: 10.1121/1.4829059.

PMID:
25669301
16.

Coding pitch differences in voiceless fricatives: Whispered relative to normal speech.

Heeren WF.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Dec;138(6):3427-38. doi: 10.1121/1.4936859.

PMID:
26723300
17.

A psychoacoustic method for studying the necessary and sufficient perceptual cues of American English fricative consonants in noise.

Li F, Trevino A, Menon A, Allen JB.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Oct;132(4):2663-75. doi: 10.1121/1.4747008.

18.

Effects of contextual cues on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic stimulation.

Kong YY, Donaldson G, Somarowthu A.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 May;137(5):2846-57. doi: 10.1121/1.4919337.

19.

How deaf are French speakers to stress?

Michelas A, Frauenfelder UH, Schön D, Dufour S.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Mar;139(3):1333-42. doi: 10.1121/1.4944574.

PMID:
27036270
20.

The psychophysics of roughness applied to dysphonic voice.

Eddins DA, Kopf LM, Shrivastav R.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Dec;138(6):3820-5. doi: 10.1121/1.4937753.

Supplemental Content

Support Center