Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 114

1.

Evaluation of a chromogenic culture medium for the detection of Clostridium difficile.

Yang JJ, Nam YS, Kim MJ, Cho SY, You E, Soh YS, Lee HJ.

Yonsei Med J. 2014 Jul;55(4):994-8. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.4.994.

2.

Performance of chromID Clostridium difficile agar compared with BBL C. difficile selective agar for detection of C. difficile in stool specimens.

Han SB, Chang J, Shin SH, Park KG, Lee GD, Park YG, Park YJ.

Ann Lab Med. 2014 Sep;34(5):376-9. doi: 10.3343/alm.2014.34.5.376. Epub 2014 Aug 21.

3.

A cost-effective approach for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: toxigenic culture using ChromID Clostridium difficile agar.

Luk S, To WK, Ng TK, Hui WT, Lee WK, Lau F, Ching AM.

J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Feb;52(2):671-3. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03113-13. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

4.

Isolation of Clostridium difficile from faecal specimens--a comparison of chromID C. difficile agar and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar.

Carson KC, Boseiwaqa LV, Thean SK, Foster NF, Riley TV.

J Med Microbiol. 2013 Sep;62(Pt 9):1423-7. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.056515-0. Epub 2013 Apr 11.

PMID:
23579394
5.

Evaluation of the chromogenic agar chromID C. difficile.

Eckert C, Burghoffer B, Lalande V, Barbut F.

J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Mar;51(3):1002-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02601-12. Epub 2012 Dec 26.

6.

[Evaluation of growth of clinical Clostridium difficile strains belonging to different PCR-ribotypes on chromID C. difficile Agar].

Karpiński P, Pituch H, Lachowicz D, Piotrowski M, Obuch-Woszczatyński P.

Med Dosw Mikrobiol. 2015;67(1):9-14. Polish.

PMID:
26084070
7.

Comparison of culture based methods for the isolation of Clostridium difficile from stool samples in a research setting.

Lister M, Stevenson E, Heeg D, Minton NP, Kuehne SA.

Anaerobe. 2014 Aug;28:226-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Jul 16.

8.

C. difficile PCR-ribotype 023 might go undetected when using ChromId C. difficile agar.

Reigadas E, Alcalá L, Marín M, Martín A, Bouza E.

Anaerobe. 2017 Apr;44:34-35. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Jan 17.

PMID:
28108388
9.

Novel one-step method for detection and isolation of active-toxin-producing Clostridium difficile strains directly from stool samples.

Darkoh C, Dupont HL, Kaplan HB.

J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Dec;49(12):4219-24. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01033-11. Epub 2011 Oct 5.

10.

Isolation and quantitation of Clostridium difficile in aqueous and fecal matter using two types of selective media.

Housman ST, Banevicius MA, Lamb LM, Nicolau DP.

J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2016 Jun;49(3):445-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2015.05.012. Epub 2015 Jun 27.

11.

Role of culture and toxin detection in laboratory testing for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Peterson LR, Kelly PJ, Nordbrock HA.

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Apr;15(4):330-6.

PMID:
8781886
12.

Comparison of a commercial real-time PCR assay for tcdB detection to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay and toxigenic culture for direct detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in clinical samples.

Stamper PD, Alcabasa R, Aird D, Babiker W, Wehrlin J, Ikpeama I, Carroll KC.

J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Feb;47(2):373-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01613-08. Epub 2008 Dec 10.

13.

Comparison of ChromID C. difficile agar and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar for the recovery of Clostridium difficile.

Boseiwaqa LV, Foster NF, Thean SK, Squire MM, Riley TV, Carson KC.

Pathology. 2013 Aug;45(5):495-500. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0b013e3283632680.

PMID:
23846295
14.

Comparison of ChromID agar and Clostridium difficile selective agar for effective isolation of C. difficile from stool specimens.

Shin BM, Lee EJ.

Ann Lab Med. 2014 Jan;34(1):15-9. doi: 10.3343/alm.2014.34.1.15. Epub 2013 Dec 6.

15.

Evaluation of the fully automated BD MAX Cdiff and Xpert C. difficile assays for direct detection of Clostridium difficile in stool specimens.

Dalpke AH, Hofko M, Zorn M, Zimmermann S.

J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jun;51(6):1906-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00344-13. Epub 2013 Mar 20.

16.
17.

Comparison of two selective media for the recovery of Clostridium difficile from environmental surfaces.

Hill KA, Collins J, Wilson L, Perry JD, Gould FK.

J Hosp Infect. 2013 Feb;83(2):164-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Nov 30.

PMID:
23201396
18.
19.
20.

Effective and reduced-cost modified selective medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile.

Nerandzic MM, Donskey CJ.

J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Feb;47(2):397-400. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01591-08. Epub 2008 Dec 10.

Supplemental Content

Support Center