Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 113

1.

Delayed plastic responses to anodal tDCS in older adults.

Fujiyama H, Hyde J, Hinder MR, Kim SJ, McCormack GH, Vickers JC, Summers JJ.

Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Jun 6;6:115. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00115. eCollection 2014.

2.

Duration-dependent effects of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism on anodal tDCS induced motor cortex plasticity in older adults: a group and individual perspective.

Puri R, Hinder MR, Fujiyama H, Gomez R, Carson RG, Summers JJ.

Front Aging Neurosci. 2015 Jun 5;7:107. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00107. eCollection 2015.

3.

Reversing motor adaptation deficits in the ageing brain using non-invasive stimulation.

Panouillères MT, Joundi RA, Brittain JS, Jenkinson N.

J Physiol. 2015 Aug 15;593(16):3645-55. doi: 10.1113/JP270484. Epub 2015 Jun 23.

4.
5.

Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability.

Tremblay S, Larochelle-Brunet F, Lafleur LP, El Mouderrib S, Lepage JF, Théoret H.

Eur J Neurosci. 2016 Sep;44(5):2184-90. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13321. Epub 2016 Jul 12.

PMID:
27336413
6.

The association of motor imagery and kinesthetic illusion prolongs the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal tract excitability.

Kaneko F, Shibata E, Hayami T, Nagahata K, Aoyama T.

J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Apr 15;13:36. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0143-8.

7.

Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation can induce bidirectional shifts in motor cortical excitability in awake humans.

Groppa S, Bergmann TO, Siems C, Mölle M, Marshall L, Siebner HR.

Neuroscience. 2010 Apr 14;166(4):1219-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.01.019. Epub 2010 Jan 18.

PMID:
20083166
8.

BDNF-Val66Met-polymorphism impact on cortical plasticity in schizophrenia patients: a proof-of-concept study.

Strube W, Nitsche MA, Wobrock T, Bunse T, Rein B, Herrmann M, Schmitt A, Nieratschker V, Witt SH, Rietschel M, Falkai P, Hasan A.

Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014 Oct 31;18(4). pii: pyu040. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyu040.

9.

Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans.

Batsikadze G, Moliadze V, Paulus W, Kuo MF, Nitsche MA.

J Physiol. 2013 Apr 1;591(7):1987-2000. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.249730. Epub 2013 Jan 21.

10.

Parietal transcranial direct current stimulation modulates primary motor cortex excitability.

Rivera-Urbina GN, Batsikadze G, Molero-Chamizo A, Paulus W, Kuo MF, Nitsche MA.

Eur J Neurosci. 2015 Mar;41(6):845-55. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12840. Epub 2015 Feb 3.

PMID:
25645274
11.

Increased transcranial direct current stimulation after effects during concurrent peripheral electrical nerve stimulation.

Rizzo V, Terranova C, Crupi D, Sant'angelo A, Girlanda P, Quartarone A.

Brain Stimul. 2014 Jan-Feb;7(1):113-21. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Oct 17.

PMID:
24388283
12.
13.

The effects of anodal-tDCS on cross-limb transfer in older adults.

Goodwill AM, Daly RM, Kidgell DJ.

Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Nov;126(11):2189-97. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Feb 4.

PMID:
25732105
14.

Motor cortex-induced plasticity by noninvasive brain stimulation: a comparison between transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Simis M, Adeyemo BO, Medeiros LF, Miraval F, Gagliardi RJ, Fregni F.

Neuroreport. 2013 Dec 4;24(17):973-5. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000021.

PMID:
24100412
15.

Differential effects of dual and unihemispheric motor cortex stimulation in older adults.

Lindenberg R, Nachtigall L, Meinzer M, Sieg MM, Flöel A.

J Neurosci. 2013 May 22;33(21):9176-83. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0055-13.2013.

16.

The effects of anodal-tDCS on corticospinal excitability enhancement and its after-effects: conventional vs. unihemispheric concurrent dual-site stimulation.

Vaseghi B, Zoghi M, Jaberzadeh S.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Sep 30;9:533. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00533. eCollection 2015.

17.

Increasing human leg motor cortex excitability by transcranial high frequency random noise stimulation.

Laczó B, Antal A, Rothkegel H, Paulus W.

Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2014;32(3):403-10. doi: 10.3233/RNN-130367.

PMID:
24576783
18.

a-tDCS differential modulation of corticospinal excitability: the effects of electrode size.

Bastani A, Jaberzadeh S.

Brain Stimul. 2013 Nov;6(6):932-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.04.005. Epub 2013 Apr 28.

PMID:
23664681
19.

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the control of finger force during dexterous manipulation in healthy older adults.

Parikh PJ, Cole KJ.

PLoS One. 2015 Apr 9;10(4):e0124137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124137. eCollection 2015.

20.

Excitability modulation of the motor system induced by transcranial direct current stimulation: a multimodal approach.

Pellicciari MC, Brignani D, Miniussi C.

Neuroimage. 2013 Dec;83:569-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.076. Epub 2013 Jul 9.

PMID:
23845429

Supplemental Content

Support Center