Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 120

1.

Rapid infusion pump overestimates delivered flow during rapid vascular filling: a bench study.

Le Noel A, Goffrais M, Almayrac A, Riou B, Langeron O, Raux M.

Eur J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;22(4):260-5. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000145.

PMID:
24910964
2.

An analysis of drug delivery dynamics via a pediatric central venous infusion system: quantification of delays in achieving intended doses.

Bartels K, Moss DR, Peterfreund RA.

Anesth Analg. 2009 Oct;109(4):1156-61. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181b220c9.

PMID:
19762743
3.

Central venous pressure measurements: peripherally inserted catheters versus centrally inserted catheters.

Black IH, Blosser SA, Murray WB.

Crit Care Med. 2000 Dec;28(12):3833-6.

PMID:
11153622
4.

Hydrodynamic evaluation of intravenous infusion systems.

Elad D, Zaretsky U, Heller O.

Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Mar;23(3):457-63.

PMID:
8135419
5.

Do SmartSite antireflux valves limit the flow rate of 0.9% normal saline through intravenous cannulas?

Liu D, Keijzers G.

Eur J Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;20(2):123-5. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32835730fc.

PMID:
22828650
6.

[What is infusion therapy?].

[No authors listed]

Rev Infirm. 2002 May;(81):19-22. French. No abstract available.

PMID:
12078606
8.

Flow-rate measurements and models for colloid and crystalloid flows in central and peripheral venous line infusion systems.

Chen IY, Huang YC, Lin WH.

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2002 Dec;49(12 Pt 2):1632-8.

PMID:
12549746
9.

Factors affecting rapid fluid resuscitation with large-bore introducer catheters.

Dutky PA, Stevens SL, Maull KI.

J Trauma. 1989 Jun;29(6):856-60.

PMID:
2738983
12.
13.

Venous air embolism during home infusion therapy.

Laskey AL, Dyer C, Tobias JD.

Pediatrics. 2002 Jan;109(1):E15.

PMID:
11773583
14.
15.

In-line pressure within a HOTLINEĀ® Fluid Warmer, under various flow conditions.

Higashi M, Yamaura K, Matsubara Y, Fukudome T, Hoka S.

J Clin Monit Comput. 2015 Apr;29(2):301-5. doi: 10.1007/s10877-014-9605-3. Epub 2014 Aug 3.

PMID:
25087123
16.

Proximal humerus intraosseous infusion: a preferred emergency venous access.

Paxton JH, Knuth TE, Klausner HA.

J Trauma. 2009 Sep;67(3):606-11. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b16f42.

PMID:
19741408
17.

Central venous catheter infusions: a laboratory model shows large differences in drug delivery dynamics related to catheter dead volume.

Lovich MA, Peterfreund GL, Sims NM, Peterfreund RA.

Crit Care Med. 2007 Dec;35(12):2792-8.

PMID:
18074479
18.

An in vitro analysis of central venous drug delivery by continuous infusion: the effect of manifold design and port selection.

Moss DR, Bartels K, Peterfreund GL, Lovich MA, Sims NM, Peterfreund RA.

Anesth Analg. 2009 Nov;109(5):1524-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b7c359.

PMID:
19843791
19.

Effect of External Pressure and Catheter Gauge on Flow Rate, Kinetic Energy, and Endothelial Injury During Intravenous Fluid Administration in a Rabbit Model.

Hu MH, Chan WH, Chen YC, Cherng CH, Lin CK, Tsai CS, Chou YC, Huang GS.

Shock. 2016 Jan;45(1):98-103. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000464.

PMID:
26674456
20.

Variability in infusion pressure and continuous flow rate delivered from pressurized bag pump flush systems.

Hug MI, Buettiker V, Cornelius A, Weiss M.

Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002 Jun;30(3):341-7.

Supplemental Content

Support Center