Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 104

1.

Potential avoidability of planned cesarean sections in a French national database.

Coulm B, Blondel B, Alexander S, Boulvain M, Le Ray C.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Sep;93(9):905-12. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12439. Epub 2014 Jul 23.

PMID:
24910420
2.

Non-clinical determinants of planned cesarean delivery in cases of term breech presentation in France.

Carayol M, Zeitlin J, Roman H, Le Ray C, Breart G, Goffinet F; Premoda Study Group.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(9):1071-8.

PMID:
17712647
3.

[Epidemiological surveillance and obstetrical dystocias surgery in Senegal].

Bouillin D, Fournier G, Gueye A, Diadhiou F, Cissé CT.

Sante. 1994 Nov-Dec;4(6):399-406. French.

4.

Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).

Sentilhes L, Vayssière C, Beucher G, Deneux-Tharaux C, Deruelle P, Diemunsch P, Gallot D, Haumonté JB, Heimann S, Kayem G, Lopez E, Parant O, Schmitz T, Sellier Y, Rozenberg P, d'Ercole C.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 28. Review.

5.

Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium.

Goffinet F, Carayol M, Foidart JM, Alexander S, Uzan S, Subtil D, Bréart G; PREMODA Study Group.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;194(4):1002-11.

6.

Planned vaginal delivery of fetuses in breech presentation at term: prenatal determinants predictive of elevated risk of cesarean delivery during labor.

Roman H, Carayol M, Watier L, Le Ray C, Breart G, Goffinet F.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 May;138(1):14-22. Epub 2007 Aug 8.

PMID:
17689853
7.

Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term.

Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph KS, Heaman M, Sauve R, Kramer MS; Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System.

CMAJ. 2007 Feb 13;176(4):455-60.

8.

[Cesarean sections in Senegal: coverage of needs and quality of services].

Cisse CT, Faye EO, de Bernis L, Dujardin B, Diadhiou F.

Sante. 1998 Sep-Oct;8(5):369-77. French.

9.

Elective cesarean delivery for term breech.

Krebs L, Langhoff-Roos J.

Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Apr;101(4):690-6.

PMID:
12681872
10.

[Factors associated with cesarean section in France. Results from the 1995 National Perinatal Survey].

Guihard P, Blondel B.

J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2001 Sep;30(5):444-543. French.

11.

Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.

Pang MW, Leung TN, Lau TK, Hang Chung TK.

Birth. 2008 Jun;35(2):121-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00225.x.

PMID:
18507583
12.

Obstetric interventions for low-risk pregnant women in France: do maternity unit characteristics make a difference?

Coulm B, Le Ray C, Lelong N, Drewniak N, Zeitlin J, Blondel B.

Birth. 2012 Sep;39(3):183-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2012.00547.x. Epub 2012 Jun 27.

PMID:
23281900
13.

Characterization of potentially avoidable cases in a 1-year series of consecutive cesarean sections in the tertiary maternity unit of Guadeloupe (French West Indies).

Kadhel P, Delrieu D, Deloumeaux J, Ryan C, Janky E.

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Aug;42(8):944-50. doi: 10.1111/jog.13007. Epub 2016 Apr 19.

PMID:
27094021
15.

[Mode of delivery and term breech presentation in the PREMODA cohort].

Carayol M, Alexander S, Goffinet F, Bréart G, Alexander S, Uzan S, Subtil D, Carayol M, Foidart JM; Comité Scientifique; Comité de Pilotage.

J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2004 Feb;33(1 Suppl):S37-44. French.

16.

Is a planned cesarean necessary in twin pregnancies?

Vendittelli F, Rivière O, Crenn-Hébert C, Riethmuller D, Schaal JP, Dreyfus M; Perinatal Sentinel Network, AUDIPOG.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 Oct;90(10):1147-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01130.x. Epub 2011 May 20.

PMID:
21426308
17.

Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section in singleton term breech presentation: a study of 1116 cases.

Golfier F, Vaudoyer F, Ecochard R, Champion F, Audra P, Raudrant D.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001 Oct;98(2):186-92.

PMID:
11574129
18.

Level of perinatal care of the maternity unit and rate of cesarean in low-risk nulliparas.

Le Ray C, Carayol M, Zeitlin J, Bréart G, Goffinet F; PREMODA Study Group.

Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;107(6):1269-77.

PMID:
16738151
19.

[Particular maternal or fetal clinical conditions influencing the choice of the mode of delivery in case of previous cesarean].

Schmitz T.

J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012 Dec;41(8):772-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.029. Epub 2012 Nov 3. Review. French.

20.

Cesarean delivery in Finland: maternal complications and obstetric risk factors.

Pallasmaa N, Ekblad U, Aitokallio-Tallberg A, Uotila J, Raudaskoski T, Ulander VM, Hurme S.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010 Jul;89(7):896-902. doi: 10.3109/00016349.2010.487893.

PMID:
20583935

Supplemental Content

Support Center