Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 95

1.

The Biomechanical Effect of Loading Speed on Metal-on-UHMWPE Contact Mechanics.

Zdero R, Bagheri ZS, Rezaey M, Schemitsch EH, Bougherara H.

Open Biomed Eng J. 2014 May 16;8:28-34. doi: 10.2174/1874120701408010028. eCollection 2014.

2.

Contact mechanics of metal-on-metal hip implants employing a metallic cup with a UHMWPE backing.

Liu F, Jin ZM, Grigoris P, Hirt F, Rieker C.

Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2003;217(3):207-13.

PMID:
12807161
4.

Experimental and theoretical study of the contact mechanics of five total knee joint replacements.

Stewart T, Jin ZM, Shaw D, Auger DD, Stone M, Fisher J.

Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1995;209(4):225-31.

PMID:
8907216
5.
6.
7.

Dynamic contact stress and rolling resistance model for total knee arthroplasties.

Waldman SD, Bryant JT.

J Biomech Eng. 1997 Aug;119(3):254-60.

PMID:
9285338
8.

Effect of stair descent loading on ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear in a force-controlled knee simulator.

Benson LC, DesJardins JD, Harman MK, LaBerge M.

Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2002;216(6):409-18.

PMID:
12502005
9.

Using a surrogate contact pair to evaluate polyethylene wear in prosthetic knee joints.

Sanders AP, Lockard CA, Weisenburger JN, Haider H, Raeymaekers B.

J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2016 Jan;104(1):133-40. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33360. Epub 2015 Feb 10.

PMID:
25677393
10.

Towards an accurate understanding of UHMWPE visco-dynamic behaviour for numerical modelling of implants.

Quinci F, Dressler M, Strickland AM, Limbert G.

J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Apr;32:62-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.12.023. Epub 2014 Jan 3.

PMID:
24434602
11.

A simple fully integrated contact-coupled wear prediction for ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene hip implants.

Kang L, Galvin AL, Jin ZM, Fisher J.

Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2006 Jan;220(1):33-46.

PMID:
16459444
12.

Wear simulation of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene hip implants by incorporating the effects of cross-shear and contact pressure.

Kang L, Galvin AL, Brown TD, Fisher J, Jin ZM.

Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2008 Oct;222(7):1049-64.

PMID:
19024153
13.

A comprehensive combined experimental and computational framework for pre-clinical wear simulation of total knee replacements.

Abdelgaied A, Fisher J, Jennings LM.

J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Nov 17;78:282-291. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.11.022. [Epub ahead of print]

14.

Effect of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene thickness on contact mechanics in total knee replacement.

El-Deen M, García-Fiñana M, Jin ZM.

Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2006 Oct;220(7):733-42.

PMID:
17117763
15.

Morphology of in vitro generated ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene wear particles as a function of contact conditions and material parameters.

Landry ME, Blanchard CR, Mabrey JD, Wang X, Agrawal CM.

J Biomed Mater Res. 1999 Spring;48(1):61-9.

PMID:
10029151
16.

An observation on subsurface defects of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene due to rolling contact.

Ohashi M, Tomita N, Ikada Y, Ikeuchi K, Motoike T.

Biomed Mater Eng. 1996;6(6):441-51.

PMID:
9138654
17.

Repair of peripheral vertical meniscus lesions in porcine menisci: in vitro biomechanical testing of 3 different meniscus repair devices.

Lee YH, Nyland J, Burden R, Caborn DN.

Am J Sports Med. 2013 May;41(5):1074-81. doi: 10.1177/0363546513479775. Epub 2013 Mar 8.

PMID:
23475943
18.

Miniature specimen shear punch test for UHMWPE used in total joint replacements.

Kurt SM, Jewett CW, Bergström JS, Foulds JR, Edidin AA.

Biomaterials. 2002 May;23(9):1907-19.

PMID:
11996031
19.

Biomechanical evaluation of physeal-sparing fixation methods in tibial eminence fractures.

Anderson CN, Nyman JS, McCullough KA, Song Y, Uppuganti S, O'Neill KR, Anderson AF, Dunn WR.

Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1586-94. doi: 10.1177/0363546513488505. Epub 2013 May 20.

PMID:
23690259
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center