Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 110

1.

Discrimination of breast microcalcifications using a strain-compounding technique with ultrasound speckle factor imaging.

Liao YY, Li CH, Tsui PH, Chang CC, Kuo WH, Chang KJ, Yeh CK.

IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2014 Jun;61(6):955-65. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2014.2991.

PMID:
24859659
2.

Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging.

Xiao Y, Zeng J, Niu L, Zeng Q, Wu T, Wang C, Zheng R, Zheng H.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014 Feb;40(2):275-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.09.032. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

PMID:
24268454
3.

Strain-compounding technique with ultrasound Nakagami imaging for distinguishing between benign and malignant breast tumors.

Liao YY, Li CH, Tsui PH, Chang CC, Kuo WH, Chang KJ, Yeh CK.

Med Phys. 2012 May;39(5):2325-33. doi: 10.1118/1.3700167.

PMID:
22559602
4.

Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio.

Stachs A, Hartmann S, Stubert J, Dieterich M, Martin A, Kundt G, Reimer T, Gerber B.

Ultraschall Med. 2013 Apr;34(2):131-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1313168. Epub 2012 Oct 29.

PMID:
23108926
5.

Real-time US elastography in the differentiation of suspicious microcalcifications on mammography.

Cho N, Moon WK, Park JS.

Eur Radiol. 2009 Jul;19(7):1621-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1335-4. Epub 2009 Feb 18.

PMID:
19224219
6.

Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.

Au FW, Ghai S, Moshonov H, Kahn H, Brennan C, Dua H, Crystal P.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Sep;203(3):W328-36. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11693.

PMID:
25148191
7.

Lesion edge preserved direct average strain estimation for ultrasound elasticity imaging.

Hussain MA, Alam F, Rupa SA, Awwal R, Lee SY, Hasan MK.

Ultrasonics. 2014 Jan;54(1):137-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2013.05.010. Epub 2013 Jun 10.

PMID:
23806339
8.

Ultrasonic elastography in breast cancer diagnosis: strain ratio vs 5-point scale.

Zhi H, Xiao XY, Yang HY, Ou B, Wen YL, Luo BM.

Acad Radiol. 2010 Oct;17(10):1227-33. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.05.004. Epub 2010 Jul 22.

PMID:
20650662
9.

Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions.

Zhang X, Xiao Y, Zeng J, Qiu W, Qian M, Wang C, Zheng R, Zheng H.

Eur J Radiol. 2014 Jan;83(1):e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Sep 23.

PMID:
24148563
10.

Enhancement of photoacoustic image quality by sound speed correction: ex vivo evaluation.

Yoon C, Kang J, Han S, Yoo Y, Song TK, Chang JH.

Opt Express. 2012 Jan 30;20(3):3082-90. doi: 10.1364/OE.20.003082.

PMID:
22330545
11.

Computer-aided diagnosis based on speckle patterns in ultrasound images.

Moon WK, Lo CM, Huang CS, Chen JH, Chang RF.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012 Jul;38(7):1251-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.02.029. Epub 2012 May 12.

PMID:
22579548
12.

Diagnostic value of commercially available shear-wave elastography for breast cancers: integration into BI-RADS classification with subcategories of category 4.

Youk JH, Gweon HM, Son EJ, Han KH, Kim JA.

Eur Radiol. 2013 Oct;23(10):2695-704. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2873-3. Epub 2013 May 8.

PMID:
23652850
13.

Speckle reduction approach for breast ultrasound image and its application to breast cancer diagnosis.

Su Y, Wang H, Wang Y, Guo Y, Cheng H, Zhang Y, Tian J.

Eur J Radiol. 2010 Jul;75(1):e136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.10.001. Epub 2009 Nov 12.

PMID:
19913380
14.

In Vivo response to compression of 35 breast lesions observed with a two-dimensional locally regularized strain estimation method.

Brusseau E, Detti V, Coulon A, Maissiat E, Boublay N, Berthezène Y, Fromageau J, Bush N, Bamber J.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014 Feb;40(2):300-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.02.017. Epub 2013 Dec 6.

PMID:
24315397
15.

Real-time ultrasound elastography: its potential role in assessment of breast lesions.

Zhu QL, Jiang YX, Liu JB, Liu H, Sun Q, Dai Q, Chen X.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008 Aug;34(8):1232-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.01.004. Epub 2008 Mar 21.

PMID:
18359145
16.

Direct mean strain estimation for elastography using nearest-neighbor weighted least-squares approach in the frequency domain.

Hasan MK, Anas EM, Alam SK, Lee SY.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012 Oct;38(10):1759-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.01.026. Epub 2012 Jul 19.

PMID:
22818879
17.

Automatic detection of microcalcifications in breast ultrasound.

Chang RF, Hou YL, Huang CS, Chen JH, Chang JM, Moon WK.

Med Phys. 2013 Oct;40(10):102901. doi: 10.1118/1.4821098.

PMID:
24089929
18.

Diagnosis of solid breast lesions by elastography 5-point score and strain ratio method.

Zhao QL, Ruan LT, Zhang H, Yin YM, Duan SX.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Nov;81(11):3245-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jun 27.

PMID:
22749109
19.

New image processing technique for evaluating breast microcalcifications: a comparative study.

Machado P, Eisenbrey JR, Cavanaugh B, Forsberg F.

J Ultrasound Med. 2012 Jun;31(6):885-93.

PMID:
22644685
20.

2-D strain assessment in the mouse through spatial compounding of myocardial velocity data: in vivo feasibility.

Kremer F, Dresselaers T, Heyde B, Ferferieva V, Caluwé E, Choi HF, Claus P, Oosterlinck W, Janssens S, Himmelreich U, D'hooge J.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013 Oct;39(10):1848-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 Jul 5.

PMID:
23830981

Supplemental Content

Support Center