Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 115


The reliability of parafoveal cone density measurements.

Liu BS, Tarima S, Visotcky A, Pechauer A, Cooper RF, Landsem L, Wilk MA, Godara P, Makhijani V, Sulai YN, Syed N, Yasumura G, Garg AK, Pennesi ME, Lujan BJ, Dubra A, Duncan JL, Carroll J.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;98(8):1126-31. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304823. Epub 2014 May 22.


Repeatability of in vivo parafoveal cone density and spacing measurements.

Garrioch R, Langlo C, Dubis AM, Cooper RF, Dubra A, Carroll J.

Optom Vis Sci. 2012 May;89(5):632-43. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182540562.


Automatic detection of modal spacing (Yellott's ring) in adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope images.

Cooper RF, Langlo CS, Dubra A, Carroll J.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013 Jul;33(4):540-9. doi: 10.1111/opo.12070. Epub 2013 May 13.


Reliability and Agreement Between Metrics of Cone Spacing in Adaptive Optics Images of the Human Retinal Photoreceptor Mosaic.

Giannini D, Lombardo G, Mariotti L, Devaney N, Serrao S, Lombardo M.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Jun 1;58(7):3127-3137. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-20890.


Intersubject variability of foveal cone photoreceptor density in relation to eye length.

Li KY, Tiruveedhula P, Roorda A.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Dec;51(12):6858-67. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5499. Epub 2010 Aug 4.


Distribution differences of macular cones measured by AOSLO: Variation in slope from fovea to periphery more pronounced than differences in total cones.

Elsner AE, Chui TY, Feng L, Song HX, Papay JA, Burns SA.

Vision Res. 2017 Mar;132:62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.06.015. Epub 2016 Nov 3.


Variability in Human Cone Topography Assessed by Adaptive Optics Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy.

Zhang T, Godara P, Blanco ER, Griffin RL, Wang X, Curcio CA, Zhang Y.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;160(2):290-300.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.04.034. Epub 2015 Apr 30.


Comparing Parafoveal Cone Photoreceptor Mosaic Metrics in Younger and Older Age Groups Using an Adaptive Optics Retinal Camera.

Jacob J, Paques M, Krivosic V, Dupas B, Erginay A, Tadayoni R, Gaudric A.

Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017 Jan 1;48(1):45-50. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20161219-06.


Automated analysis of differential interference contrast microscopy images of the foveal cone mosaic.

Wojtas DH, Wu B, Ahnelt PK, Bones PJ, Millane RP.

J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2008 May;25(5):1181-9.


Adaptive optics imaging of parafoveal cones in type 1 diabetes.

Lombardo M, Parravano M, Lombardo G, Varano M, Boccassini B, Stirpe M, Serrao S.

Retina. 2014 Mar;34(3):546-57. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182a10850.


Reliability and Repeatability of Cone Density Measurements in Patients With Stargardt Disease and RPGR-Associated Retinopathy.

Tanna P, Kasilian M, Strauss R, Tee J, Kalitzeos A, Tarima S, Visotcky A, Dubra A, Carroll J, Michaelides M.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Jul 1;58(9):3608-3615. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-21904.


Variation in rod and cone density from the fovea to the mid-periphery in healthy human retinas using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.

Wells-Gray EM, Choi SS, Bries A, Doble N.

Eye (Lond). 2016 Aug;30(8):1135-43. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.107. Epub 2016 May 27.


Repeatability of Cone Spacing Measures in Eyes With Inherited Retinal Degenerations.

Zayit-Soudry S, Sippl-Swezey N, Porco TC, Lynch SK, Syed R, Ratnam K, Menghini M, Roorda AJ, Duncan JL.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Sep 1;56(10):6179-89. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-17010.


Interocular symmetry of parafoveal photoreceptor cone density distribution.

Lombardo M, Lombardo G, Schiano Lomoriello D, Ducoli P, Stirpe M, Serrao S.

Retina. 2013 Sep;33(8):1640-9. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182807642.


High-resolution adaptive optics retinal imaging of cellular structure in choroideremia.

Morgan JI, Han G, Klinman E, Maguire WM, Chung DC, Maguire AM, Bennett J.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Sep 4;55(10):6381-97. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13454.


Cone photoreceptor definition on adaptive optics retinal imaging.

Muthiah MN, Gias C, Chen FK, Zhong J, McClelland Z, Sallo FB, Peto T, Coffey PJ, da Cruz L.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;98(8):1073-9. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304615. Epub 2014 Apr 11.


A study of factors affecting the human cone photoreceptor density measured by adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Park SP, Chung JK, Greenstein V, Tsang SH, Chang S.

Exp Eye Res. 2013 Mar;108:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2012.12.011. Epub 2012 Dec 28.


Eccentricity dependent changes of density, spacing and packing arrangement of parafoveal cones.

Lombardo M, Serrao S, Ducoli P, Lombardo G.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013 Jul;33(4):516-26. doi: 10.1111/opo.12053. Epub 2013 Mar 29.


Modeling the foveal cone mosaic imaged with adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.

Putnam NM, Hammer DX, Zhang Y, Merino D, Roorda A.

Opt Express. 2010 Nov 22;18(24):24902-16. doi: 10.1364/OE.18.024902.


Automated Photoreceptor Cell Identification on Nonconfocal Adaptive Optics Images Using Multiscale Circular Voting.

Liu J, Jung H, Dubra A, Tam J.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Sep 1;58(11):4477-4489. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-21003.

Supplemental Content

Support Center