Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 96

1.

Reliability of stereotactic coordinates of 1.5-tesla and 3-tesla MRI in radiosurgery and functional neurosurgery.

Kim HY, Lee SI, Jin SJ, Jin SC, Kim JS, Jeon KD.

J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2014 Mar;55(3):136-41. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2014.55.3.136. Epub 2014 Mar 31.

2.

Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging of the normal brain: comparisons between under the conditions of 3.0 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla.

Sohn CH, Sevick RJ, Frayne R, Chang HW, Kim SP, Kim DK.

Korean J Radiol. 2010 Jan-Feb;11(1):19-24. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2010.11.1.19. Epub 2009 Dec 28.

3.

Magnetic resonance imaging of hyaline cartilage defects at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of medium T2-weighted fast spin echo, T1-weighted two-dimensional and three-dimensional gradient echo pulse sequences.

Fischbach F, Bruhn H, Unterhauser F, Ricke J, Wieners G, Felix R, Weiler A, Schröder RJ.

Acta Radiol. 2005 Feb;46(1):67-73. Erratum in: Acta Radiol. 2005 Apr;46(2):218.

PMID:
15841742
4.

Diagnostic comparison of 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla preoperative MRI of the wrist in patients with ulnar-sided wrist pain.

Anderson ML, Skinner JA, Felmlee JP, Berger RA, Amrami KK.

J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Sep;33(7):1153-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.02.028.

PMID:
18762112
5.

Characterization of adrenal lesions using chemical shift MRI: comparison between 1.5 Tesla and two echo time pair selection at 3.0 Tesla MRI.

Nakamura S, Namimoto T, Morita K, Utsunomiya D, Oda S, Nakaura T, Hirai T, Yamashita Y.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Jan;35(1):95-102. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22728. Epub 2011 Oct 14.

PMID:
22002867
6.

Quantitative and qualitative comparison of 3.0T and 1.5T MR imaging of the liver in patients with diffuse parenchymal liver disease.

Tsurusaki M, Semelka RC, Zapparoli M, Elias J Jr, Altun E, Pamuklar E, Sugimura K.

Eur J Radiol. 2009 Nov;72(2):314-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.07.027. Epub 2008 Sep 13.

PMID:
18789840
7.

Advances of 3T MR imaging in visualizing trabecular bone structure of the calcaneus are partially SNR-independent: analysis using simulated noise in relation to micro-CT, 1.5T MRI, and biomechanical strength.

Bauer JS, Monetti R, Krug R, Matsuura M, Mueller D, Eckstein F, Rummeny EJ, Lochmueller EM, Raeth CW, Link TM.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Jan;29(1):132-40. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21625.

PMID:
19097112
8.

Water excitation MPRAGE: an alternative sequence for postcontrast imaging of the abdomen in noncooperative patients at 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla MRI.

Altun E, Semelka RC, Dale BM, Elias J Jr.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 May;27(5):1146-54. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21346.

PMID:
18425826
9.

Clinical evaluation of stereotactic target localization using 3-Tesla MRI for radiosurgery planning.

MacFadden D, Zhang B, Brock KK, Hodaie M, Laperriere N, Schwartz M, Tsao M, Stainsby J, Lockwood G, Mikulis D, Ménard C.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Apr;76(5):1472-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.020. Epub 2009 Jun 8.

PMID:
19515512
10.

Assessment of the cervical spine denticulate ligament using MRI volumetric sequence: Comparison between 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla.

Seragioli R, Simao MN, Simao GN, Herrero CFPS, Nogueira-Barbosa MH.

J Neuroradiol. 2018 Mar;45(2):147-151. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Oct 14.

PMID:
29038025
11.

A simple method for evaluating stereotactic accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography Imaging in Frame Based Radiosurgery.

Sajeev T, Musthafa M, Sampath S, Indiradevi B, Bhanumathy G, Supe SS.

Gulf J Oncolog. 2013 Jul;1(14):6-13.

PMID:
23996861
12.

MR imaging of the fetal brain at 1.5T and 3.0T field strengths: comparing specific absorption rate (SAR) and image quality.

Krishnamurthy U, Neelavalli J, Mody S, Yeo L, Jella PK, Saleem S, Korzeniewski SJ, Cabrera MD, Ehterami S, Bahado-Singh RO, Katkuri Y, Haacke EM, Hernandez-Andrade E, Hassan SS, Romero R.

J Perinat Med. 2015 Mar;43(2):209-20. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2014-0268.

PMID:
25324440
13.

Breast MRI: intraindividual comparative study at 1.5 and 3.0T; initial experience.

Djilas-Ivanovic DD, Prvulovic NP, Bogdanovic-Stojanovic DD, Ivkovic-Kapicl TV, Ivanovic VM, Golubovic A, Semelka RC.

J BUON. 2012 Jan-Mar;17(1):65-72.

PMID:
22517695
14.

Double inversion black-blood fast spin-echo imaging of the human heart: a comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T.

Greenman RL, Shirosky JE, Mulkern RV, Rofsky NM.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Jun;17(6):648-55.

PMID:
12766893
15.

T-staging of rectal cancer: accuracy of 3.0 Tesla MRI compared with 1.5 Tesla.

Maas M, Lambregts DM, Lahaye MJ, Beets GL, Backes W, Vliegen RF, Osinga-de Jong M, Wildberger JE, Beets-Tan RG.

Abdom Imaging. 2012 Jun;37(3):475-81. doi: 10.1007/s00261-011-9770-5.

16.

Evaluation of the spatial accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging-based stereotactic target localization for gamma knife radiosurgery of functional disorders.

Bednarz G, Downes MB, Corn BW, Curran WJ, Goldman HW.

Neurosurgery. 1999 Nov;45(5):1156-61; discussion 1161-3.

PMID:
10549932
17.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the cranial nerves in the posterior fossa: a comparative study of t2-weighted spin-echo sequences at 1.5 and 3.0 tesla.

Fischbach F, Müller M, Bruhn H.

Acta Radiol. 2008 Apr;49(3):358-63. doi: 10.1080/02841850701824127.

PMID:
18365827
18.

[Suppression of CSF artifact in fast FLAIR sequence at 3.0 Tesla].

Fujiwara Y, Ishimori Y, Yamaguchi I, Matsuda T, Miyati T, Kimura H.

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2008 Dec 20;64(12):1513-21. Japanese.

19.

Potential human error in setting stereotactic coordinates for radiosurgery: implications for quality assurance.

Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD, Kondziolka D, Maitz A.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993 Sep 30;27(2):397-401.

PMID:
8407416
20.

Correction of motion-induced misalignment in co-registered PET/CT and MRI (T1/T2/FLAIR) head images for stereotactic radiosurgery.

Li G, Xie H, Ning H, Citrin D, Kaushal A, Camphausen K, Miller RW.

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010 Oct 7;12(1):3306.

PMID:
21330976

Supplemental Content

Support Center