Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 157

1.

Attitudes of non-African American focus group participants toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.

Yu JH, Crouch J, Jamal SM, Bamshad MJ, Tabor HK.

Am J Med Genet A. 2014 Sep;164A(9):2153-60. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36610. Epub 2014 May 20.

2.

Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.

Yu JH, Crouch J, Jamal SM, Tabor HK, Bamshad MJ.

Am J Med Genet A. 2013 May;161A(5):1064-72. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35914.

3.

Use of metaphors about exome and whole genome sequencing.

Nelson SC, Crouch JM, Bamshad MJ, Tabor HK, Yu JH.

Am J Med Genet A. 2016 May;170A(5):1127-33. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37571. Epub 2016 Jan 29.

PMID:
26822973
4.

Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing.

Yu JH, Harrell TM, Jamal SM, Tabor HK, Bamshad MJ.

Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Jul 3;95(1):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Jun 26.

5.

"We don't know her history, her background": adoptive parents' perspectives on whole genome sequencing results.

Crouch J, Yu JH, Shankar AG, Tabor HK.

J Genet Couns. 2015 Feb;24(1):67-77. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9738-z. Epub 2014 Jul 12.

6.

Parental Views on Expanded Newborn Screening Using Whole-Genome Sequencing.

Joseph G, Chen F, Harris-Wai J, Puck JM, Young C, Koenig BA.

Pediatrics. 2016 Jan;137 Suppl 1:S36-46. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3731H.

7.

Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project.

Sanderson SC, Linderman MD, Suckiel SA, Diaz GA, Zinberg RE, Ferryman K, Wasserstein M, Kasarskis A, Schadt EE.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Jan;24(1):14-20. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.118. Epub 2015 Jun 3. Erratum in: Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Jan;24(1):153.

8.

Stakeholders' opinions on the implementation of pediatric whole exome sequencing: implications for informed consent.

Levenseller BL, Soucier DJ, Miller VA, Harris D, Conway L, Bernhardt BA.

J Genet Couns. 2014 Aug;23(4):552-65. doi: 10.1007/s10897-013-9626-y. Epub 2013 Jul 12.

9.

Dynamic software design for clinical exome and genome analyses: insights from bioinformaticians, clinical geneticists, and genetic counselors.

Shyr C, Kushniruk A, van Karnebeek CD, Wasserman WW.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Mar;23(2):257-68. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv053. Epub 2015 Jun 27.

10.

Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.

Facio FM, Eidem H, Fisher T, Brooks S, Linn A, Kaphingst KA, Biesecker LG, Biesecker BB.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2013 Mar;21(3):261-5. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.179. Epub 2012 Aug 15.

11.

Overcoming challenges to meaningful informed consent for whole genome sequencing in pediatric cancer research.

Oberg JA, Glade Bender JL, Cohn EG, Morris M, Ruiz J, Chung WK, Appelbaum PS, Kung AL, Levine JM.

Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015 Aug;62(8):1374-80. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25520. Epub 2015 Apr 1.

PMID:
25832998
12.

Self-guided management of exome and whole-genome sequencing results: changing the results return model.

Yu JH, Jamal SM, Tabor HK, Bamshad MJ.

Genet Med. 2013 Sep;15(9):684-90. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.35. Epub 2013 Apr 25.

13.

Genomics really gets personal: how exome and whole genome sequencing challenge the ethical framework of human genetics research.

Tabor HK, Berkman BE, Hull SC, Bamshad MJ.

Am J Med Genet A. 2011 Dec;155A(12):2916-24. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34357. Epub 2011 Oct 28.

14.

The MedSeq Project: a randomized trial of integrating whole genome sequencing into clinical medicine.

Vassy JL, Lautenbach DM, McLaughlin HM, Kong SW, Christensen KD, Krier J, Kohane IS, Feuerman LZ, Blumenthal-Barby J, Roberts JS, Lehmann LS, Ho CY, Ubel PA, MacRae CA, Seidman CE, Murray MF, McGuire AL, Rehm HL, Green RC; MedSeq Project.

Trials. 2014 Mar 20;15:85. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-85.

15.

Practices and policies of clinical exome sequencing providers: analysis and implications.

Jamal SM, Yu JH, Chong JX, Dent KM, Conta JH, Tabor HK, Bamshad MJ.

Am J Med Genet A. 2013 May;161A(5):935-50. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35942.

16.

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.

Middleton A, Morley KI, Bragin E, Firth HV, Hurles ME, Wright CF, Parker M; DDD study.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Jan;24(1):21-9. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.58. Epub 2015 Apr 29.

17.

Pathogenic variants for Mendelian and complex traits in exomes of 6,517 European and African Americans: implications for the return of incidental results.

Tabor HK, Auer PL, Jamal SM, Chong JX, Yu JH, Gordon AS, Graubert TA, O'Donnell CJ, Rich SS, Nickerson DA; NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, Bamshad MJ.

Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Aug 7;95(2):183-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Jul 31.

18.

Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children.

Sapp JC, Dong D, Stark C, Ivey LE, Hooker G, Biesecker LG, Biesecker BB.

Clin Genet. 2014 Feb;85(2):120-6. doi: 10.1111/cge.12254. Epub 2013 Sep 20.

19.

Analytical validation of whole exome and whole genome sequencing for clinical applications.

Linderman MD, Brandt T, Edelmann L, Jabado O, Kasai Y, Kornreich R, Mahajan M, Shah H, Kasarskis A, Schadt EE.

BMC Med Genomics. 2014 Apr 23;7:20. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-7-20.

20.

Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.

Mackley MP, Fletcher B, Parker M, Watkins H, Ormondroyd E.

Genet Med. 2017 Mar;19(3):283-293. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.109. Epub 2016 Sep 1. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center