Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 142

1.

Optimizing image contrast display improves quantitative stenosis measurement in heavily calcified coronary arterial segments on coronary CT angiography: A proof-of-concept and comparison to quantitative invasive coronary angiography.

Shmilovich H, Cheng VY, Dey D, Rajani R, Nakazato R, Otaki Y, Nakanishi R, Vashistha V, Min JK, Berman DS.

Acad Radiol. 2014 Jun;21(6):797-804. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.02.016.

PMID:
24809320
2.

Coronary CT angiography in patients with high calcium score: evaluation of plaque characteristics and diagnostic accuracy.

Park MJ, Jung JI, Choi YS, Ann SH, Youn HJ, Jeon GN, Choi HC.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Dec;27 Suppl 1:43-51. doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-9970-7.

PMID:
22048849
3.

Impact of monochromatic coronary computed tomography angiography from single-source dual-energy CT on coronary stenosis quantification.

Stehli J, Clerc OF, Fuchs TA, Possner M, Gräni C, Benz DC, Buechel RR, Kaufmann PA.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Mar-Apr;10(2):135-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2015.12.008.

PMID:
26754621
4.

Accuracy of MDCT in assessing the degree of stenosis caused by calcified coronary artery plaques.

Zhang S, Levin DC, Halpern EJ, Fischman D, Savage M, Walinsky P.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Dec;191(6):1676-83. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.4026.

PMID:
19020235
5.

Evaluation of heavily calcified vessels with coronary CT angiography: comparison of iterative and filtered back projection image reconstruction.

Renker M, Nance JW Jr, Schoepf UJ, O'Brien TX, Zwerner PL, Meyer M, Kerl JM, Bauer RW, Fink C, Vogl TJ, Henzler T.

Radiology. 2011 Aug;260(2):390-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11103574.

PMID:
21693660
6.

Accuracy and predictive value of coronary computed tomography angiography for the detection of obstructive coronary heart disease in patients with an Agatston calcium score above 400.

Ahn SJ, Kang DK, Sun JS, Yoon MH.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2013 May-Jun;37(3):387-94. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318282d61c.

PMID:
23674010
7.

Coronary vessel and luminal area measurement using dual-source computed tomography in comparison with intravascular ultrasound: effect of window settings on measurement accuracy.

Marwan M, Pflederer T, Schepis T, Seltmann M, Ropers D, Daniel WG, Achenbach S.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011 Jan-Feb;35(1):113-8. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181f7cb30.

PMID:
21245696
8.

Comparison of quantitative atherosclerotic plaque burden from coronary CT angiography in patients with first acute coronary syndrome and stable coronary artery disease.

Dey D, Achenbach S, Schuhbaeck A, Pflederer T, Nakazato R, Slomka PJ, Berman DS, Marwan M.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014 Sep-Oct;8(5):368-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2014.07.007.

PMID:
25301042
9.

Window settings for the study of calcified carotid plaques with multidetector CT angiography.

Saba L, Mallarin G.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Aug;30(7):1445-50. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1509.

10.

Characterization of complex coronary artery stenosis morphology by coronary computed tomographic angiography.

Wertman BM, Cheng VY, Kar S, Gransar H, Berg RA, Naik H, Makkar R, Friedman JD, Schapira JN, Berman DS.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Aug;2(8):950-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.12.032.

11.

Quantification of coronary artery stenosis with high-resolution CT in comparison with histopathology in an ex vivo study.

Dettmer M, Glaser-Gallion N, Stolzmann P, Glaser-Gallion F, Fornaro J, Feuchtner G, Jochum W, Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Leschka S.

Eur J Radiol. 2013 Feb;82(2):264-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.09.021.

PMID:
23116807
12.

Carotid bifurcation calcium and correlation with percent stenosis of the internal carotid artery on CT angiography.

McKinney AM, Casey SO, Teksam M, Lucato LT, Smith M, Truwit CL, Kieffer S.

Neuroradiology. 2005 Jan;47(1):1-9.

PMID:
15650832
13.

Quantitative measurements of coronary arterial stenosis, plaque geometry, and composition are highly reproducible with a standardized coronary arterial computed tomographic approach in high-quality CT datasets.

Rinehart S, Vazquez G, Qian Z, Murrieta L, Christian K, Voros S.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011 Jan-Feb;5(1):35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2010.09.006.

PMID:
21131252
15.

Feasibility of coronary calcium and stent image subtraction using 320-detector row CT angiography.

Fuchs A, Kühl JT, Chen MY, Helqvist S, Razeto M, Arakita K, Steveson C, Arai AE, Kofoed KF.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015 Sep-Oct;9(5):393-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2015.03.016.

PMID:
26091841
16.

Computed tomography coronary angiography and invasive coronary angiography demonstrate high correlation for area stenosis quantification in noncalcified and mixed plaques.

Krupiński M, Miszalski-Jamka T, Guzik B, Andres M, Zmudka K, Mazur W, Pelberg R, Banyś R, Urbańczyk M, Kostkiewicz M.

Clin Imaging. 2012 Nov-Dec;36(6):724-31. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2012.02.005.

PMID:
23154001
17.

Accuracy of prospectively ECG-triggered very low-dose coronary dual-source CT angiography using iterative reconstruction for the detection of coronary artery stenosis: comparison with invasive catheterization.

Layritz C, Schmid J, Achenbach S, Ulzheimer S, Wuest W, May M, Ropers D, Klinghammer L, Daniel WG, Pflederer T, Lell M.

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Nov;15(11):1238-45. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu113.

PMID:
24939952
19.

The degree of stenosis on cardiac catheterization compared to calcified coronary segments on multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography MDCT.

Madaj P, Gopal A, Hamirani Y, Zeb I, Elamir S, Budoff M.

Acad Radiol. 2010 Aug;17(8):1001-5. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.04.008.

PMID:
20605733
20.

Correlation of regional distribution and morphological pattern of calcification at CT coronary artery calcium scoring with non-calcified plaque formation and stenosis.

Thilo C, Gebregziabher M, Mayer FB, Zwerner PL, Costello P, Schoepf UJ.

Eur Radiol. 2010 Apr;20(4):855-61. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1630-0.

PMID:
19862532
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center