Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 58

1.

Best practices in shock wave lithotripsy: a comparison of regional practice patterns.

Brown RD, De S, Sarkissian C, Monga M.

Urology. 2014 May;83(5):1060-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.01.017.

PMID:
24767521
2.

Clinical predictors of stone fragmentation using slow-rate shock wave lithotripsy.

Li WM, Wu WJ, Chou YH, Liu CC, Wang CJ, Huang CH, Lee YC.

Urol Int. 2007;79(2):124-8.

PMID:
17851280
3.

The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower pole calculi compared with isolated middle and upper caliceal calculi.

Obek C, Onal B, Kantay K, Kalkan M, Yalçin V, Oner A, Solok V, Tansu N.

J Urol. 2001 Dec;166(6):2081-4; discussion 2085.

PMID:
11696710
4.

Factors determining stone-free rate in shock wave lithotripsy using standard focus of Storz Modulith SLX-F2 lithotripter.

Elkoushy MA, Hassan JA, Morehouse DD, Anidjar M, Andonian S.

Urology. 2011 Oct;78(4):759-63. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.03.005. Epub 2011 May 7.

PMID:
21550641
5.
6.

Shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: a randomized, double-blind trial.

Pace KT, Ghiculete D, Harju M, Honey RJ; University of Toronto Lithotripsy Associates.

J Urol. 2005 Aug;174(2):595-9.

PMID:
16006908
7.

Optimising an escalating shockwave amplitude treatment strategy to protect the kidney from injury during shockwave lithotripsy.

Handa RK, McAteer JA, Connors BA, Liu Z, Lingeman JE, Evan AP.

BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E1041-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11207.x. Epub 2012 May 22.

8.

Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.

El-Nahas AR, Ibrahim HM, Youssef RF, Sheir KZ.

BJU Int. 2012 Sep;110(6):898-902. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10961.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.

9.

Retrograde intrarenal surgery vs extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for intermediate size inferior pole calculi: a prospective assessment of objective and subjective outcomes.

Singh BP, Prakash J, Sankhwar SN, Dhakad U, Sankhwar PL, Goel A, Kumar M.

Urology. 2014 May;83(5):1016-22. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.12.026. Epub 2014 Feb 21.

PMID:
24560970
10.

Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.

Koo V, Young M, Thompson T, Duggan B.

BJU Int. 2011 Dec;108(11):1913-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10172.x. Epub 2011 Mar 31.

11.

Outcomes using a fourth-generation lithotripter: a new benchmark for comparison?

Nomikos MS, Sowter SJ, Tolley DA.

BJU Int. 2007 Dec;100(6):1356-60. Epub 2007 Sep 11.

12.
13.

A prospective, randomized study of the clinical effects of shock wave delivery for unilateral kidney stones: 60 versus 120 shocks per minute.

Ng CF, Lo AK, Lee KW, Wong KT, Chung WY, Gohel D.

J Urol. 2012 Sep;188(3):837-42. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 Jul 20.

PMID:
22819406
14.

Internet and postal survey of endourologic practice patterns among American urologists.

Hollowell CM, Patel RV, Bales GT, Gerber GS.

J Urol. 2000 Jun;163(6):1779-82.

PMID:
10799181
15.

Can Phyllanthus niruri affect the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones? A randomized, prospective, long-term study.

Micali S, Sighinolfi MC, Celia A, De Stefani S, Grande M, Cicero AF, Bianchi G.

J Urol. 2006 Sep;176(3):1020-2.

PMID:
16890682
16.

Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results.

Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV, Denstedt JD, Grasso M, Gutierrez-Aceves J, Kahn RI, Leveillee RJ, Lingeman JE, Macaluso JN Jr, Munch LC, Nakada SY, Newman RC, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Teichman J, Woods JR.

J Urol. 2001 Dec;166(6):2072-80. Erratum in: J Urol 2002 Apr;167(4):1805.

PMID:
11696709
17.

A new transportable shock-wave lithotripsy machine for managing urinary stones: a single-centre experience with a dual-focus lithotripter.

De Sio M, Autorino R, Quarto G, Mordente S, Giugliano F, Di Giacomo F, Neri F, Quattrone C, Sorrentino D, De Domenico R, D'Armiento M.

BJU Int. 2007 Nov;100(5):1137-41. Epub 2007 Jun 5.

18.

Use of ureteral stent in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shen P, Jiang M, Yang J, Li X, Li Y, Wei W, Dai Y, Zeng H, Wang J.

J Urol. 2011 Oct;186(4):1328-35. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.05.073. Review.

PMID:
21855945
19.

Impact of radiological technologists on the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy.

Elkoushy MA, Morehouse DD, Anidjar M, Elhilali MM, Andonian S.

Urology. 2012 Apr;79(4):777-80. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.09.013. Epub 2011 Nov 4.

PMID:
22055696
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center