Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 102

2.

How do typographical factors affect reading text and comprehension performance in Arabic?

Ganayim D, Ibrahim R.

Hum Factors. 2013 Apr;55(2):323-32.

PMID:
23691828
3.

A Special Font for People with Dyslexia: Does it Work and, if so, why?

Marinus E, Mostard M, Segers E, Schubert TM, Madelaine A, Wheldall K.

Dyslexia. 2016 Aug;22(3):233-44. doi: 10.1002/dys.1527. Epub 2016 May 19.

PMID:
27194598
4.

The effect of font size on reading comprehension on second and fifth grade children: bigger is not always better.

Katzir T, Hershko S, Halamish V.

PLoS One. 2013 Sep 19;8(9):e74061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074061. eCollection 2013.

5.

(Con)text-specific effects of visual dysfunction on reading in posterior cortical atrophy.

Yong KX, Shakespeare TJ, Cash D, Henley SM, Warren JD, Crutch SJ.

Cortex. 2014 Aug;57:92-106. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Apr 12.

6.

A New Font, Specifically Designed for Peripheral Vision, Improves Peripheral Letter and Word Recognition, but Not Eye-Mediated Reading Performance.

Bernard JB, Aguilar C, Castet E.

PLoS One. 2016 Apr 13;11(4):e0152506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152506. eCollection 2016.

7.

The effect of letter spacing on reading speed in central and peripheral vision.

Chung ST.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Apr;43(4):1270-6.

PMID:
11923275
8.

Small effect of interline spacing on maximal reading speed in low-vision patients with central field loss irrespective of scotoma size.

Calabrèse A, Bernard JB, Hoffart L, Faure G, Barouch F, Conrath J, Castet E.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Feb;51(2):1247-54. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-3682. Epub 2009 Oct 15.

PMID:
19834038
9.

Page mode reading with simulated scotomas: a modest effect of interline spacing on reading speed.

Bernard JB, Scherlen AC, Castet E.

Vision Res. 2007 Dec;47(28):3447-59. Erratum in: Vision Res. 2008 May;48(10):1280. Anne-Catherine, Scherlen [corrected to Scherlen, Anne-Catherine]; Eric, Castet [corrected to Castet, Eric].

10.

Effect of font size and glare on computer tasks in young and older adults.

Ko P, Mohapatra A, Bailey IL, Sheedy J, Rempel DM.

Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Jun;91(6):682-9. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000274.

PMID:
24830373
11.
12.

Interword and interletter spacing effects during reading revisited: Interactions with word and font characteristics.

Slattery TJ, Yates M, Angele B.

J Exp Psychol Appl. 2016 Dec;22(4):406-422.

PMID:
27936854
13.

Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate.

Pelli DG, Tillman KA, Freeman J, Su M, Berger TD, Majaj NJ.

J Vis. 2007 Oct 26;7(2):20.1-36. doi: 10.1167/7.2.20. Review.

PMID:
18217835
15.

A STUDY ON VISUAL LIMITATION OF AGE, NUMERICAL SIZE, AND EXPOSURE TIME WHILE USERS OPERATE MOBILE DEVICES.

Yeh PC.

Percept Mot Skills. 2015 Dec;121(3):823-31. doi: 10.2466/24.PMS.121c26x3. Epub 2015 Dec 10.

PMID:
26654989
16.

The effect of font size on reading performance in strabismic amblyopia: an eye movement investigation.

Kanonidou E, Gottlob I, Proudlock FA.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Jan 23;55(1):451-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13257.

PMID:
24370829
17.

[A comparison of Chinese reading parameters among rapid serial visual presentation, full screen and printed displays].

Wang CX, Lü F, Xu D, Chen J, Xie RZ, Zhu L, Qu J.

Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Aug;43(8):704-8. Chinese.

PMID:
18001567
18.

Enhanced text spacing improves reading performance in individuals with macular disease.

Blackmore-Wright S, Georgeson MA, Anderson SJ.

PLoS One. 2013 Nov 11;8(11):e80325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080325. eCollection 2013.

19.
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center