Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 204

1.

Conformational recognition of an intrinsically disordered protein.

Krieger JM, Fusco G, Lewitzky M, Simister PC, Marchant J, Camilloni C, Feller SM, De Simone A.

Biophys J. 2014 Apr 15;106(8):1771-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.03.004.

2.

A J-modulated protonless NMR experiment characterizes the conformational ensemble of the intrinsically disordered protein WIP.

Rozentur-Shkop E, Goobes G, Chill JH.

J Biomol NMR. 2016 Dec;66(4):243-257. doi: 10.1007/s10858-016-0073-6. Epub 2016 Nov 14.

PMID:
27844185
3.
4.

Identification of polyproline II regions derived from the proline-rich nuclear receptor coactivators PNRC and PNRC2: new insights for ERα coactivator interactions.

Byrne C, Miclet E, Broutin I, Gallo D, Pelekanou V, Kampa M, Castanas E, Leclercq G, Jacquot Y.

Chirality. 2013 Oct;25(10):628-42. doi: 10.1002/chir.22188. Epub 2013 Aug 8.

PMID:
23925889
5.

Distinct binding modes of two epitopes in Gab2 that interact with the SH3C domain of Grb2.

Harkiolaki M, Tsirka T, Lewitzky M, Simister PC, Joshi D, Bird LE, Jones EY, O'Reilly N, Feller SM.

Structure. 2009 Jun 10;17(6):809-22. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2009.03.017.

6.

Hydrodynamic Radii of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Determined from Experimental Polyproline II Propensities.

Tomasso ME, Tarver MJ, Devarajan D, Whitten ST.

PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Jan 4;12(1):e1004686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004686. eCollection 2016 Jan.

7.

Probing the dynamics of disorder.

Fox SJ, Kannan S.

Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2017 Sep;128:57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 May 26. Review.

PMID:
28554553
8.

Conformational propensities of intrinsically disordered proteins influence the mechanism of binding and folding.

Arai M, Sugase K, Dyson HJ, Wright PE.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 4;112(31):9614-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1512799112. Epub 2015 Jul 20.

9.

How to Grb2 a Gab.

Wöhrle FU, Daly RJ, Brummer T.

Structure. 2009 Jun 10;17(6):779-81. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2009.05.003.

10.

Deducing the functional characteristics of the human selenoprotein SELK from the structural properties of its intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain.

Polo A, Colonna G, Guariniello S, Ciliberto G, Costantini S.

Mol Biosyst. 2016 Mar;12(3):758-72. doi: 10.1039/c5mb00679a. Epub 2016 Jan 6.

PMID:
26735936
11.

Thermodynamic contribution of backbone conformational entropy in the binding between SH3 domain and proline-rich motif.

Zeng D, Shen Q, Cho JH.

Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017 Feb 26;484(1):21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.01.089. Epub 2017 Jan 19.

PMID:
28111343
12.

Multiscale enhanced sampling of intrinsically disordered protein conformations.

Lee KH, Chen J.

J Comput Chem. 2016 Mar 5;37(6):550-7. doi: 10.1002/jcc.23957. Epub 2015 Jun 6.

PMID:
26052838
13.

Anchoring intrinsically disordered proteins to multiple targets: lessons from N-terminus of the p53 protein.

Huang Y, Liu Z.

Int J Mol Sci. 2011 Feb 23;12(2):1410-30. doi: 10.3390/ijms12021410.

14.

Ligand clouds around protein clouds: a scenario of ligand binding with intrinsically disordered proteins.

Jin F, Yu C, Lai L, Liu Z.

PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(10):e1003249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003249. Epub 2013 Oct 3.

15.

Binding of the cSH3 domain of Grb2 adaptor to two distinct RXXK motifs within Gab1 docker employs differential mechanisms.

McDonald CB, Seldeen KL, Deegan BJ, Bhat V, Farooq A.

J Mol Recognit. 2011 Jul-Aug;24(4):585-96. doi: 10.1002/jmr.1080. Epub 2010 Dec 13.

16.

Bivalent binding drives the formation of the Grb2-Gab1 signaling complex in a noncooperative manner.

McDonald CB, Bhat V, Mikles DC, Deegan BJ, Seldeen KL, Farooq A.

FEBS J. 2012 Jun;279(12):2156-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08600.x. Epub 2012 May 9.

17.

The binding mechanisms of intrinsically disordered proteins.

Dogan J, Gianni S, Jemth P.

Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2014 Apr 14;16(14):6323-31. doi: 10.1039/c3cp54226b. Epub 2013 Dec 6.

PMID:
24317797
18.

Conformational propensities of intrinsically disordered proteins from NMR chemical shifts.

Kragelj J, Ozenne V, Blackledge M, Jensen MR.

Chemphyschem. 2013 Sep 16;14(13):3034-45. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201300387. Epub 2013 Jun 21. Review.

PMID:
23794453
19.

Conformational propensities and dynamics of a βγ-crystallin, an intrinsically disordered protein.

Patel S, Ramanujam V, Srivastava AK, Chary KV.

Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2014 Jul 7;16(25):12703-18. doi: 10.1039/c3cp53558d.

PMID:
24671380
20.

Binding cavities and druggability of intrinsically disordered proteins.

Zhang Y, Cao H, Liu Z.

Protein Sci. 2015 May;24(5):688-705. doi: 10.1002/pro.2641. Epub 2015 Feb 24.

Supplemental Content

Support Center