Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 176

1.

Forefoot midsole stiffness affects forefoot and rearfoot kinematics during the stance phase of gait.

Resende RA, Fonseca ST, Silva PL, Pertence AE, Kirkwood RN.

J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2014 Mar;104(2):183-90. doi: 10.7547/0003-0538-104.2.183.

PMID:
24725040
2.

Forefoot-rearfoot coupling patterns and tibial internal rotation during stance phase of barefoot versus shod running.

Eslami M, Begon M, Farahpour N, Allard P.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2007 Jan;22(1):74-80. Epub 2006 Oct 17.

PMID:
17049700
3.

Quantifying rearfoot-forefoot coordination in human walking.

Chang R, Van Emmerik R, Hamill J.

J Biomech. 2008 Oct 20;41(14):3101-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.07.024. Epub 2008 Sep 7.

PMID:
18778823
4.

Forefoot angle determines duration and amplitude of pronation during walking.

Monaghan GM, Lewis CL, Hsu WH, Saltzman E, Hamill J, Holt KG.

Gait Posture. 2013 May;38(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.10.003. Epub 2012 Oct 30.

PMID:
23117096
5.

Is midsole thickness a key parameter for the running pattern?

Chambon N, Delattre N, Gu├ęguen N, Berton E, Rao G.

Gait Posture. 2014;40(1):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Feb 20.

PMID:
24636223
7.

Fore- and rearfoot kinematics in high- and low-arched individuals during running.

Barnes A, Wheat J, Milner CE.

Foot Ankle Int. 2011 Jul;32(7):710-6.

PMID:
21972767
8.

Comparison of foot kinematics between subjects with posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction and healthy controls.

Tome J, Nawoczenski DA, Flemister A, Houck J.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Sep;36(9):635-44. Erratum in: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Dec;36(12):968.

PMID:
17017268
9.

Multi-segment foot kinematics and ground reaction forces during gait of individuals with plantar fasciitis.

Chang R, Rodrigues PA, Van Emmerik RE, Hamill J.

J Biomech. 2014 Aug 22;47(11):2571-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Jun 11.

PMID:
24992816
10.

Forefoot, rearfoot and shank coupling: effect of variations in speed and mode of gait.

Pohl MB, Messenger N, Buckley JG.

Gait Posture. 2007 Feb;25(2):295-302. Epub 2006 Jun 6.

PMID:
16759862
11.

Late rearfoot eversion and lower-limb internal rotation caused by changes in the interaction between forefoot and support surface.

Souza TR, Pinto RZ, Trede RG, Kirkwood RN, Pertence AE, Fonseca ST.

J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2009 Nov-Dec;99(6):503-11.

PMID:
19917736
12.

A clinically applicable six-segmented foot model.

De Mits S, Segers V, Woodburn J, Elewaut D, De Clercq D, Roosen P.

J Orthop Res. 2012 Apr;30(4):655-61. doi: 10.1002/jor.21570. Epub 2011 Oct 21.

13.

Inter-segment foot motion and ground reaction forces over the stance phase of walking.

Hunt AE, Smith RM, Torode M, Keenan AM.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2001 Aug;16(7):592-600.

PMID:
11470301
14.
15.

Gender differences associated with rearfoot, midfoot, and forefoot kinematics during running.

Takabayashi T, Edama M, Nakamura M, Nakamura E, Inai T, Kubo M.

Eur J Sport Sci. 2017 Nov;17(10):1289-1296. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2017.1382578. Epub 2017 Sep 29.

PMID:
28961074
16.

Changes in foot and shank coupling due to alterations in foot strike pattern during running.

Pohl MB, Buckley JG.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008 Mar;23(3):334-41. Epub 2007 Nov 19.

PMID:
18006125
17.

The effect of forefoot and arch posting orthotic designs on first metatarsophalangeal joint kinematics during gait.

Nawoczenski DA, Ludewig PM.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004 Jun;34(6):317-27.

PMID:
15233393
18.

The influence of footwear on foot motion during walking and running.

Morio C, Lake MJ, Gueguen N, Rao G, Baly L.

J Biomech. 2009 Sep 18;42(13):2081-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.06.015. Epub 2009 Jul 29.

PMID:
19643421
19.

Pedobarographic and kinematic analysis in the functional evaluation of two post-operative forefoot offloading shoes.

Caravaggi P, Giangrande A, Berti L, Lullini G, Leardini A.

J Foot Ankle Res. 2015 Oct 29;8:59. doi: 10.1186/s13047-015-0116-3. eCollection 2015.

20.

Orthoses posted in both the forefoot and rearfoot reduce moments and angular impulses on lower extremity joints during walking.

Hsu WH, Lewis CL, Monaghan GM, Saltzman E, Hamill J, Holt KG.

J Biomech. 2014 Aug 22;47(11):2618-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 Jun 6.

PMID:
24968944

Supplemental Content

Support Center