Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 85

1.

[Registration of patient data. "Active refusal" the way in England].

Järhult B.

Lakartidningen. 2014 Mar 12-18;111(11):445. Swedish. No abstract available.

PMID:
24720016
2.

Power to the people.

[No authors listed]

Nature. 2014 Jan 16;505(7483):261. No abstract available.

PMID:
24436980
3.

Issues of consent and privacy affecting the functioning of ASERNIP-S.

Crompton M.

ANZ J Surg. 2002 Aug;72(8):535-6. No abstract available.

PMID:
12190720
4.

Care.data, consent, and confidentiality.

Shaw D.

Lancet. 2014 Apr 5;383(9924):1205. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60594-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
24703557
5.

[Collection and processing of personal data to evaluate cancer screening programmes - results of a survey of the German population in light of the bill 'early detection of cancer and cancer registries'].

Greiner F, Nolte S, Waldmann A, Katalinic A, Breitbart EW.

Gesundheitswesen. 2013 Nov;75(11):751-3. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1355420. German.

PMID:
24142370
6.

Where should we draw the line between quality of care and other ethical concerns related to medical registries and biobanks?

Hansson M.

Theor Med Bioeth. 2012 Aug;33(4):313-23. doi: 10.1007/s11017-012-9229-x.

PMID:
22810581
7.

Managing information and knowledge within maternity services: Privacy and consent issues.

Baskaran V, Davis K, Bali RK, Naguib RN, Wickramasinghe N.

Inform Health Soc Care. 2013 Sep;38(3):196-210. doi: 10.3109/17538157.2012.735732.

PMID:
23323681
8.
9.

A review of the personal health records in selected countries and Iran.

Ahmadi M, Jeddi FR, Gohari MR, Sadoughi F.

J Med Syst. 2012 Apr;36(2):371-82. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9482-3. Review.

PMID:
20703713
10.

The changing face of quality in spine surgery.

Grob D, Mannion AF.

Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18 Suppl 3:277-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1090-x. No abstract available.

11.

Electronic health records and research: privacy versus scientific priorities.

Hoffman S.

Am J Bioeth. 2010 Sep;10(9):19-20. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.492894. No abstract available.

PMID:
20818550
12.

Privacy, consent, and the electronic mental health record: The Person vs. the System.

Clemens NA.

J Psychiatr Pract. 2012 Jan;18(1):46-50. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000410987.38723.47.

PMID:
22261983
13.

Standardised representation of healthcare information in secondary care research: a Central England case study.

Lim Choi Keung SN, Ogunsina I, Rossiter J, Langford G, Tyler E, Arvanitis TN.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;180:529-33.

PMID:
22874247
14.

Medical data: widen use in research.

Farrar J.

Nature. 2014 Feb 6;506(7486):34. doi: 10.1038/506034b. No abstract available.

PMID:
24499908
15.

Medical data: the choice to opt out.

Lewis G.

Nature. 2014 Feb 6;506(7486):34. doi: 10.1038/506034a. No abstract available.

PMID:
24499909
16.

Autonomy, privacy and informed consent 3: elderly care perspective.

Scott PA, Välimäki M, Leino-Kilpi H, Dassen T, Gasull M, Lemonidou C, Arndt M.

Br J Nurs. 2003 Feb 13-26;12(3):158-68.

PMID:
12610371
17.

Ethical issues in using data from quality management programs.

Nerenz DR.

Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18 Suppl 3:321-30. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0972-2. Review.

18.

Informed consent and patient registry for the rare disease community: Editorial.

Grady C, Rubinstein YR, Groft SC.

Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Jan;33(1):3-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.10.005. No abstract available.

19.
20.

Holding personal information in a disease-specific register: the perspectives of people with multiple sclerosis and professionals on consent and access.

Baird W, Jackson R, Ford H, Evangelou N, Busby M, Bull P, Zajicek J.

J Med Ethics. 2009 Feb;35(2):92-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.025304.

PMID:
19181880

Supplemental Content

Support Center