Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 136

1.

Quantitative sonoelastography of the uterine cervix prior to induction of labor as a predictor of cervical dilation time.

Hee L, Rasmussen CK, Schlütter JM, Sandager P, Uldbjerg N.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Jul;93(7):684-90. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12389. Epub 2014 May 12.

PMID:
24702544
2.

Quantitative sonoelastography of the uterine cervix by interposition of a synthetic reference material.

Hee L, Sandager P, Petersen O, Uldbjerg N.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Nov;92(11):1244-9. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12246. Epub 2013 Sep 16.

PMID:
24032689
3.

Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour.

Elghorori MR, Hassan I, Dartey W, Abdel-Aziz E, Bradley M.

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Aug;26(6):521-6.

PMID:
17000497
4.

Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy.

Strobel E, Sladkevicius P, Rovas L, De Smet F, Karlsson ED, Valentin L.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;28(3):298-305.

5.

Does ultrasound examination when the cervix is unfavorable improve the prediction of failed labor induction?

Roman H, Verspyck E, Vercoustre L, Degre S, Col JY, Firmin JM, Caron P, Marpeau L.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Apr;23(4):357-62.

6.

Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction.

Gabriel R, Darnaud T, Chalot F, Gonzalez N, Leymarie F, Quereux C.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;19(3):254-7.

7.

[Cervical ultrasonography versus Bishop score as a predictor of vaginal delivery].

Aragão JR, Feitosa FE, Alencar CA Jr, Vasconcelos RP, de Amorim MM, Passini R Jr.

Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2011 Nov;33(11):361-6. Portuguese.

8.
9.

Diagnostic accuracy of cervical elastography in predicting labor induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Londero AP, Schmitz R, Bertozzi S, Driul L, Fruscalzo A.

J Perinat Med. 2016 Mar;44(2):167-78. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2015-0035. Review.

PMID:
26011923
10.

[Elastography of cervix to predict delay from induction to delivery].

Sonnier L, Bouhanna P, Arnou C, Rozenberg P.

Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2014 Dec;42(12):827-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Nov 13. French.

PMID:
25458805
11.

Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor.

Pandis GK, Papageorghiou AT, Ramanathan VG, Thompson MO, Nicolaides KH.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Dec;18(6):623-8.

12.

Imaging analysis of cervical elastography for prediction of successful induction of labor at term.

Hwang HS, Sohn IS, Kwon HS.

J Ultrasound Med. 2013 Jun;32(6):937-46. doi: 10.7863/ultra.32.6.937.

PMID:
23716514
13.

[Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the cervix and digital examination before labor induction].

Gomes F, Ramalho C, Machado AP, Calado E, Cardoso F, Montenegro N.

Acta Med Port. 2006 Mar-Apr;19(2):109-14. Epub 2006 Aug 18. Portuguese.

14.

The role of cervical Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy in the prediction of the course and outcome of induced labour.

Jokhi RP, Brown BH, Anumba DO.

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Sep 2;9:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-9-40.

15.

The Bishop score as a predictor of labor induction success: a systematic review.

Kolkman DG, Verhoeven CJ, Brinkhorst SJ, van der Post JA, Pajkrt E, Opmeer BC, Mol BW.

Am J Perinatol. 2013 Sep;30(8):625-30. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1331024. Epub 2013 Jan 2. Review.

PMID:
23283806
16.

[Elastography in the examination of the uterine cervix before labor induction].

Preis K, Swiatkowska-Freund M, Pankrac Z.

Ginekol Pol. 2010 Oct;81(10):757-61. Polish.

PMID:
21117304
17.

Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of the cervix for predicting time to spontaneous onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy.

Rovas L, Sladkevicius P, Strobel E, De Smet F, De Moor B, Valentin L.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;28(3):306-11.

18.

A Hertzian contact mechanics based formulation to improve ultrasound elastography assessment of uterine cervical tissue stiffness.

Briggs BN, Stender ME, Muljadi PM, Donnelly MA, Winn VD, Ferguson VL.

J Biomech. 2015 Jun 25;48(9):1524-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.03.032. Epub 2015 Apr 29.

PMID:
26003483
19.

Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction.

Uyar Y, Erbay G, Demir BC, Baytur Y.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Sep;280(3):357-62. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0915-x. Epub 2009 Jan 8.

PMID:
19130065
20.

Usefulness of elastography in predicting the outcome of Foley catheter labour induction.

Wozniak S, Czuczwar P, Szkodziak P, Paszkowski T.

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Jun;55(3):245-50. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12331. Epub 2015 Jun 5.

PMID:
26044410

Supplemental Content

Support Center