Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 107

1.

Radiographic variables that may predict clinical outcomes in cervical disk replacement surgery.

Rihn JA, Radcliff K, Hipp J, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS, Anderson DG, Albert TJ.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Apr;28(3):106-13. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826a0c84.

PMID:
24694684
2.

The posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical disc/osteophyte disease: a single-surgeon experience with a minimum of 5 years' clinical and radiographic follow-up.

Jagannathan J, Sherman JH, Szabo T, Shaffrey CI, Jane JA.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Apr;10(4):347-56. doi: 10.3171/2008.12.SPINE08576.

PMID:
19441994
3.

Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article.

Burkus JK, Traynelis VC, Haid RW Jr, Mummaneni PV.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):516-28. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE13996. Epub 2014 Jul 18.

PMID:
25036218
4.

Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients.

Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, Heller JG.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Dec 15;32(26):2933-40; discussion 2941-2.

PMID:
18091483
5.

The factors that influence the postoperative segmental range of motion after cervical artificial disc replacement.

Kang KC, Lee CS, Han JH, Chung SS.

Spine J. 2010 Aug;10(8):689-96. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.04.016. Epub 2010 May 23.

PMID:
20547108
6.

Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.

Matgé G, Berthold C, Gunness VR, Hana A, Hertel F.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Mar;22(3):237-45. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE131089. Epub 2015 Jan 2.

PMID:
25555050
7.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with a new prosthesis.

Miao J, Yu F, Shen Y, He N, Kuang Y, Wang X, Chen D.

Spine J. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):878-83. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.439. Epub 2013 Oct 2.

PMID:
24095101
8.

Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.

Parker SL, Godil SS, Shau DN, Mendenhall SK, McGirt MJ.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Feb;18(2):154-60. doi: 10.3171/2012.10.SPINE12312. Epub 2012 Nov 23.

PMID:
23176164
9.

Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.

Hou Y, Liu Y, Yuan W, Wang X, Chen H, Yang L, Zhang Y.

Spine J. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):867-77. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.432. Epub 2013 Sep 26.

PMID:
24076441
10.

Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up.

Garrido BJ, Taha TA, Sasso RC.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Aug;23(6):367-71. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181bb8568.

PMID:
20087223
11.

Predictors of outcome after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a multivariate analysis.

Anderson PA, Subach BR, Riew KD.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jan 15;34(2):161-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819286ea.

PMID:
19139666
12.

Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases.

Kim SW, Limson MA, Kim SB, Arbatin JJ, Chang KY, Park MS, Shin JH, Ju YS.

Eur Spine J. 2009 Feb;18(2):218-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0854-z. Epub 2009 Jan 6.

13.

Clinical and radiographic evaluation of cervical disk replacement: a retrospective study.

Zhang HX, Chen Y, Gao P, Shao YD, Hou Y, Cheng L, Maharjan S, Nie L.

Orthopedics. 2014 Nov;37(11):e956-61. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20141023-50.

PMID:
25361370
14.

Correlation between cervical spine sagittal alignment and clinical outcome after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Gum JL, Glassman SD, Douglas LR, Carreon LY.

Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2012 Jun;41(6):E81-4.

PMID:
22837996
15.

The effects of carpentry on heterotopic ossification and mobility in cervical arthroplasty: determination by computed tomography with a minimum 2-year follow-up: Clinical article.

Tu TH, Wu JC, Huang WC, Wu CL, Ko CC, Cheng H.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Jun;16(6):601-9. doi: 10.3171/2012.3.SPINE11436. Epub 2012 Mar 30.

PMID:
22462570
16.

Solid radiographic fusion with a nonconstrained device 5 years after cervical arthroplasty.

Heary RF, Goldstein IM, Getto KM, Agarwal N.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Dec;21(6):951-5. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.SPINE14101. Epub 2014 Oct 10.

PMID:
25303618
17.

[LOCATION CHANGE OF ROTATION CENTER AFTER SINGLE SEGMENTAL CERVICAL DISC REPLACEMENT WITH ProDisc-C].

Lou J, Liu H, Rong X, Gong Q, Song Y, Li T.

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Jan;29(1):48-53. Chinese.

PMID:
26455172
18.

Arthroplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: similar results to patients with only radiculopathy at 3 years' follow-up.

Fay LY, Huang WC, Wu JC, Chang HK, Tsai TY, Ko CC, Tu TH, Wu CL, Cheng H.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Sep;21(3):400-10. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.SPINE13387. Epub 2014 Jun 13.

PMID:
24926929
19.

[First experience and preliminary clinical results with the cervical disc replacement DISCOVER].

Greiner-Perth R, Allam Y, Silbermann J, Simank HG.

Z Orthop Unfall. 2009 Sep-Oct;147(5):582-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1185897. German.

PMID:
19938355
20.

Comparison of Bryan versus ProDisc-C total disk replacement as treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disk disease.

Zhang Z, Jiao L, Zhu W, Du Y, Zhang W.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Mar;135(3):305-11. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2149-7. Epub 2015 Jan 3.

PMID:
25555380

Supplemental Content

Support Center