Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 158

1.

The effect of strut allograft and its position on Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a biomechanical study.

Sariyilmaz K, Dikici F, Dikmen G, Bozdag E, Sunbuloglu E, Bekler B, Yazicioglu O.

J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jul;29(7):1485-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.02.017. Epub 2014 Feb 21.

PMID:
24656637
2.

Biomechanical evaluation of fracture fixation constructs using a variable-angle locked periprosthetic femur plate system.

Hoffmann MF, Burgers TA, Mason JJ, Williams BO, Sietsema DL, Jones CB.

Injury. 2014 Jul;45(7):1035-41. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.02.038. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

PMID:
24680467
3.

Superior outcome of strut allograft-augmented plate fixation for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures around a stable femoral stem.

Khashan M, Amar E, Drexler M, Chechik O, Cohen Z, Steinberg EL.

Injury. 2013 Nov;44(11):1556-60. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.04.025. Epub 2013 Jun 10.

PMID:
23755973
4.

Do Transcortical Screws in a Locking Plate Construct Improve the Stiffness in the Fixation of Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures? A Biomechanical Analysis of 2 Different Plating Constructs.

Lochab J, Carrothers A, Wong E, McLachlin S, Aldebeyan W, Jenkinson R, Whyne C, Nousiainen MT.

J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Jan;31(1):15-20. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000704.

PMID:
28002219
5.

Use of Locking Plate and Strut Onlay Allografts for Periprosthetic Fracture Around Well-Fixed Femoral Components.

Kim YH, Mansukhani SA, Kim JS, Park JW.

J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan;32(1):166-170. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.064. Epub 2016 Jun 7.

PMID:
27407037
6.

A biomechanical study comparing cortical onlay allograft struts and plates in the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Wilson D, Frei H, Masri BA, Oxland TR, Duncan CP.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005 Jan;20(1):70-6.

PMID:
15567539
7.

Cyclic loading of periprosthetic fracture fixation constructs.

Talbot M, Zdero R, Schemitsch EH.

J Trauma. 2008 May;64(5):1308-12. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31811ea244.

PMID:
18469655
8.

High union rates of locking compression plating with cortical strut allograft for type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Yeo I, Rhyu KH, Kim SM, Park YS, Lim SJ.

Int Orthop. 2016 Nov;40(11):2365-2371. Epub 2016 Jan 13.

PMID:
26759257
9.

Locking compression plate fixation of Vancouver type-B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Buttaro MA, Farfalli G, Paredes Núñez M, Comba F, Piccaluga F.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Sep;89(9):1964-9.

PMID:
17768193
10.

The effect of fixation technique on the stiffness of comminuted Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femur fractures.

Choi JK, Gardner TR, Yoon E, Morrison TA, Macaulay WB, Geller JA.

J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep;25(6 Suppl):124-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.04.009. Epub 2010 Jun 16.

PMID:
20558031
11.

The biomechanical effect of bone quality and fracture topography on locking plate fixation in periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Leonidou A, Moazen M, Lepetsos P, Graham SM, Macheras GA, Tsiridis E.

Injury. 2015 Feb;46(2):213-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.060. Epub 2014 Nov 1.

PMID:
25467710
12.

Finite element comparison of retrograde intramedullary nailing and locking plate fixation with/without an intramedullary allograft for distal femur fracture following total knee arthroplasty.

Chen SH, Chiang MC, Hung CH, Lin SC, Chang HW.

Knee. 2014 Jan;21(1):224-31. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Apr 10.

PMID:
23582376
13.

A systematic review of open reduction and internal fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures with or without allograft strut, cerclage, and locked plates.

Moore RE, Baldwin K, Austin MS, Mehta S.

J Arthroplasty. 2014 May;29(5):872-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.12.010. Epub 2014 Mar 17. Review.

PMID:
24650900
14.

Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures: a biomechanical comparison of two techniques.

Dennis MG, Simon JA, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ, Di Cesare PE.

J Orthop Trauma. 2001 Mar-Apr;15(3):177-80.

PMID:
11265007
15.

Finite element analysis of different repair methods of Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty.

Chen DW, Lin CL, Hu CC, Wu JW, Lee MS.

Injury. 2012 Jul;43(7):1061-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.01.015. Epub 2012 Feb 14.

PMID:
22336128
16.

Biomechanical evaluation of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation.

Zdero R, Walker R, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 May;90(5):1068-77. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01561.

PMID:
18451400
17.

Biomechanical comparison of two angular stable plate constructions for periprosthetic femur fracture fixation.

Wähnert D, Schröder R, Schulze M, Westerhoff P, Raschke M, Stange R.

Int Orthop. 2014 Jan;38(1):47-53. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2113-0. Epub 2013 Oct 11.

18.

Periprosthetic femoral fractures around well-fixed implants: use of cortical onlay allografts with or without a plate.

Haddad FS, Duncan CP, Berry DJ, Lewallen DG, Gross AE, Chandler HP.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Jun;84-A(6):945-50.

PMID:
12063328
19.

Better Axial Stiffness of a Bicortical Screw Construct Compared to a Cable Construct for Comminuted Vancouver B1 Proximal Femoral Fractures.

Griffiths JT, Taheri A, Day RE, Yates PJ.

J Arthroplasty. 2015 Dec;30(12):2333-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.060. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

PMID:
26239233
20.

The biomechanical assessment of fixation methods in periprosthetic femur fractures.

Gülşen M, Karatosun V, Uyulgan B.

Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2011;45(4):266-9. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2011.2338.

Supplemental Content

Support Center