Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 229

1.

Role of conditioning and verbal suggestion in placebo and nocebo effects on itch.

Bartels DJ, van Laarhoven AI, Haverkamp EA, Wilder-Smith OH, Donders AR, van Middendorp H, van de Kerkhof PC, Evers AW.

PLoS One. 2014 Mar 19;9(3):e91727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091727. eCollection 2014.

2.

Minimizing nocebo effects by conditioning with verbal suggestion: A randomized clinical trial in healthy humans.

Bartels DJP, van Laarhoven AIM, Stroo M, Hijne K, Peerdeman KJ, Donders ART, van de Kerkhof PCM, Evers AWM.

PLoS One. 2017 Sep 14;12(9):e0182959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182959. eCollection 2017.

3.

Placebo and nocebo effects in itch and pain.

Evers AW, Bartels DJ, van Laarhoven AI.

Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2014;225:205-14. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-44519-8_12. Review.

PMID:
25304534
4.

Induction of nocebo and placebo effects on itch and pain by verbal suggestions.

van Laarhoven AI, Vogelaar ML, Wilder-Smith OH, van Riel PL, van de Kerkhof PC, Kraaimaat FW, Evers AW.

Pain. 2011 Jul;152(7):1486-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.01.043. Epub 2011 Feb 24.

PMID:
21353388
5.

Placebo and nocebo effects on itch: effects, mechanisms, and predictors.

Bartels DJ, van Laarhoven AI, van de Kerkhof PC, Evers AW.

Eur J Pain. 2016 Jan;20(1):8-13. doi: 10.1002/ejp.750. Epub 2015 Sep 28. Review.

PMID:
26417885
6.

Nocebo Effects and Scratching Behaviour on Itch.

Bartels DJP, van Laarhoven AIM, van de Kerkhof PCM, Evers AWM.

Acta Derm Venereol. 2018 Nov 5;98(10):943-950. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2979.

7.

[Placebo and nocebo effects on itch : Methodological and clinical implications].

Tekampe J, Peerdeman KJ, Bartels DJP, van Laarhoven AIM, Evers AWM.

Hautarzt. 2018 Aug;69(8):626-630. doi: 10.1007/s00105-018-4211-9. Review. German.

PMID:
29947820
8.

The role of learning in nocebo and placebo effects.

Colloca L, Sigaudo M, Benedetti F.

Pain. 2008 May;136(1-2):211-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.02.006. Epub 2008 Mar 26.

PMID:
18372113
9.

The imagined itch: brain circuitry supporting nocebo-induced itch in atopic dermatitis patients.

Napadow V, Li A, Loggia ML, Kim J, Mawla I, Desbordes G, Schalock PC, Lerner EA, Tran TN, Ring J, Rosen BR, Kaptchuk TJ, Pfab F.

Allergy. 2015 Nov;70(11):1485-92. doi: 10.1111/all.12727. Epub 2015 Sep 10.

10.

The Influence of Expectation on Nondeceptive Placebo and Nocebo Effects.

Wei H, Zhou L, Zhang H, Chen J, Lu X, Hu L.

Pain Res Manag. 2018 Mar 19;2018:8459429. doi: 10.1155/2018/8459429. eCollection 2018.

11.

Cognitive Schemas in Placebo and Nocebo Responding: Role of Autobiographical Memories and Expectations.

Bartels DJP, van Laarhoven AIM, Heijmans N, Hermans D, Debeer E, van de Kerkhof PCM, Evers AWM.

Clin Ther. 2017 Mar;39(3):502-512.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 22.

12.

To Experience or to Be Informed? Classical Conditioning Induces Nocebo Hyperalgesia even when Placebo Analgesia Is Verbally Suggested-Results of a Preliminary Study.

Bajcar EA, Wiercioch-Kuzianik K, Adamczyk WM, Bąbel P.

Pain Med. 2019 Jun 5. pii: pnz123. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz123. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31165888
13.

Inducing Expectations for Health: Effects of Verbal Suggestion and Imagery on Pain, Itch, and Fatigue as Indicators of Physical Sensitivity.

Peerdeman KJ, van Laarhoven AI, Donders AR, Hopman MT, Peters ML, Evers AW.

PLoS One. 2015 Oct 8;10(10):e0139563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139563. eCollection 2015.

14.

Classical conditioning without verbal suggestions elicits placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia.

Bąbel P, Bajcar EA, Adamczyk W, Kicman P, Lisińska N, Świder K, Colloca L.

PLoS One. 2017 Jul 27;12(7):e0181856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181856. eCollection 2017.

15.

The Underestimated Significance of Conditioning in Placebo Hypoalgesia and Nocebo Hyperalgesia.

Bräscher AK, Witthöft M, Becker S.

Pain Res Manag. 2018 Jan 28;2018:6841985. doi: 10.1155/2018/6841985. eCollection 2018. Review.

16.

How the number of learning trials affects placebo and nocebo responses.

Colloca L, Petrovic P, Wager TD, Ingvar M, Benedetti F.

Pain. 2010 Nov;151(2):430-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.08.007.

17.

When words hurt: Verbal suggestion prevails over conditioning in inducing the motor nocebo effect.

Corsi N, Emadi Andani M, Sometti D, Tinazzi M, Fiorio M.

Eur J Neurosci. 2019 Jun 18. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14489. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31209960
18.

Psychological Placebo and Nocebo Effects on Pain Rely on Expectation and Previous Experience.

Reicherts P, Gerdes AB, Pauli P, Wieser MJ.

J Pain. 2016 Feb;17(2):203-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Oct 31.

19.

Nocebo-induced modulation of cerebral itch processing - An fMRI study.

van de Sand MF, Menz MM, Sprenger C, Büchel C.

Neuroimage. 2018 Feb 1;166:209-218. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.056. Epub 2017 Oct 28.

PMID:
29107770
20.

[Placebo response - Mechanisms and clinical applications].

Sölle A, Worm M, Flor H, Klinger R.

Schmerz. 2016 Oct;30(5):386-394. Review. German.

PMID:
27402263

Supplemental Content

Support Center