Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 203

1.

A comparison of radio-frequency biomotion sensors and actigraphy versus polysomnography for the assessment of sleep in normal subjects.

O'Hare E, Flanagan D, Penzel T, Garcia C, Frohberg D, Heneghan C.

Sleep Breath. 2015 Mar;19(1):91-8. doi: 10.1007/s11325-014-0967-z. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

PMID:
24614968
2.

Comparison of actigraphy and polysomnography to assess effects of zolpidem in a clinical research unit.

Peterson BT, Chiao P, Pickering E, Freeman J, Zammit GK, Ding Y, Badura LL.

Sleep Med. 2012 Apr;13(4):419-24. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2011.12.003. Epub 2012 Feb 7.

PMID:
22317945
3.

Sleep/wake measurement using a non-contact biomotion sensor.

De Chazal P, Fox N, O'Hare E, Heneghan C, Zaffaroni A, Boyle P, Smith S, O'Connell C, McNicholas WT.

J Sleep Res. 2011 Jun;20(2):356-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2010.00876.x. Epub 2010 Aug 12.

4.

Comparison of a novel non-contact biomotion sensor with wrist actigraphy in estimating sleep quality in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.

Pallin M, O'Hare E, Zaffaroni A, Boyle P, Fagan C, Kent B, Heneghan C, de Chazal P, McNicholas WT.

J Sleep Res. 2014 Aug;23(4):475-84. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12126. Epub 2014 Feb 3.

5.

Comparison of Commercial Wrist-Based and Smartphone Accelerometers, Actigraphy, and PSG in a Clinical Cohort of Children and Adolescents.

Toon E, Davey MJ, Hollis SL, Nixon GM, Horne RS, Biggs SN.

J Clin Sleep Med. 2016 Mar;12(3):343-50. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.5580.

6.

Agreement of different methods for assessing sleep characteristics: a comparison of two actigraphs, wrist and hip placement, and self-report with polysomnography.

Zinkhan M, Berger K, Hense S, Nagel M, Obst A, Koch B, Penzel T, Fietze I, Ahrens W, Young P, Happe S, Kantelhardt JW, Kluttig A, Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A, Pillmann F, Stang A.

Sleep Med. 2014 Sep;15(9):1107-14. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 May 28.

PMID:
25018025
7.

Validation study on sleep parameters by actigraphy for normal subjects.

Kawada T.

Sleep Breath. 2015 Mar;19(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s11325-014-0977-x. Epub 2014 Apr 2. No abstract available.

PMID:
24691896
8.

Response to letter on "Validation study on sleep parameters by actigraphy for normal subjects".

Heneghan C.

Sleep Breath. 2015 Mar;19(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s11325-014-0999-4. Epub 2014 May 9. No abstract available.

PMID:
24809295
9.

Direct comparison of two actigraphy devices with polysomnographically recorded naps in healthy young adults.

Cellini N, Buman MP, McDevitt EA, Ricker AA, Mednick SC.

Chronobiol Int. 2013 Jun;30(5):691-8. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2013.782312. Epub 2013 May 30.

PMID:
23721120
10.

Alternatives to polysomnography (PSG): a validation of wrist actigraphy and a partial-PSG system.

Kosmadopoulos A, Sargent C, Darwent D, Zhou X, Roach GD.

Behav Res Methods. 2014 Dec;46(4):1032-41. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0438-7.

PMID:
24442593
11.

Actigraphy for the assessment of sleep measures in Parkinson's disease.

Maglione JE, Liu L, Neikrug AB, Poon T, Natarajan L, Calderon J, Avanzino JA, Corey-Bloom J, Palmer BW, Loredo JS, Ancoli-Israel S.

Sleep. 2013 Aug 1;36(8):1209-17. doi: 10.5665/sleep.2888.

12.

Direct comparison of two new actigraphs and polysomnography in children and adolescents.

Meltzer LJ, Walsh CM, Traylor J, Westin AM.

Sleep. 2012 Jan 1;35(1):159-66. doi: 10.5665/sleep.1608.

13.

Validity of activity-based devices to estimate sleep.

Weiss AR, Johnson NL, Berger NA, Redline S.

J Clin Sleep Med. 2010 Aug 15;6(4):336-42.

14.

Movement toward a novel activity monitoring device.

Montgomery-Downs HE, Insana SP, Bond JA.

Sleep Breath. 2012 Sep;16(3):913-7. doi: 10.1007/s11325-011-0585-y. Epub 2011 Oct 6.

PMID:
21971963
15.

Factors that may influence the classification of sleep-wake by wrist actigraphy: the MrOS Sleep Study.

Blackwell T, Ancoli-Israel S, Redline S, Stone KL; Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study Group.

J Clin Sleep Med. 2011 Aug 15;7(4):357-67. doi: 10.5664/JCSM.1190.

16.

Comparison of sleep parameters from actigraphy and polysomnography in older women: the SOF study.

Blackwell T, Redline S, Ancoli-Israel S, Schneider JL, Surovec S, Johnson NL, Cauley JA, Stone KL; Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Sleep. 2008 Feb;31(2):283-91.

17.

Comparison of a Commercial Accelerometer with Polysomnography and Actigraphy in Children and Adolescents.

Meltzer LJ, Hiruma LS, Avis K, Montgomery-Downs H, Valentin J.

Sleep. 2015 Aug 1;38(8):1323-30. doi: 10.5665/sleep.4918.

18.

Comparison of Motionlogger Watch and Actiwatch actigraphs to polysomnography for sleep/wake estimation in healthy young adults.

Rupp TL, Balkin TJ.

Behav Res Methods. 2011 Dec;43(4):1152-60. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0098-4.

PMID:
21512871
19.

The sleep/wake state scoring from mandible movement signal.

Senny F, Maury G, Cambron L, Leroux A, Destiné J, Poirrier R.

Sleep Breath. 2012 Jun;16(2):535-42. doi: 10.1007/s11325-011-0539-4. Epub 2011 Jun 11.

PMID:
21660653
20.

Home is where sleep is: an ecological approach to test the validity of actigraphy for the assessment of insomnia.

Sánchez-Ortuño MM, Edinger JD, Means MK, Almirall D.

J Clin Sleep Med. 2010 Feb 15;6(1):21-9.

Supplemental Content

Support Center