Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 143

1.

Effects of cervical arthrodesis and arthroplasty on neck response during a simulated frontal automobile collision.

White NA, Moreno DP, Brown PJ, Gayzik FS, Hsu W, Powers AK, Stitzel JD.

Spine J. 2014 Sep 1;14(9):2195-207. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 12.

PMID:
24614252
2.

Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.

Cunningham BW, Hu N, Zorn CM, McAfee PC.

Spine J. 2010 Apr;10(4):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.01.006.

PMID:
20362252
3.

Biomechanical analysis of disc pressure and facet contact force after simulated two-level cervical surgeries (fusion and arthroplasty) and hybrid surgery.

Park J, Shin JJ, Lim J.

World Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;82(6):1388-93. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Jun 14.

PMID:
24937596
4.

Biomechanical Analysis of Cervical Disc Replacement and Fusion Using Single Level, Two Level, and Hybrid Constructs.

Gandhi AA, Kode S, DeVries NA, Grosland NM, Smucker JD, Fredericks DC.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Oct 15;40(20):1578-85. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001044.

PMID:
26165217
5.

Disc replacement adjacent to cervical fusion: a biomechanical comparison of hybrid construct versus two-level fusion.

Lee MJ, Dumonski M, Phillips FM, Voronov LI, Renner SM, Carandang G, Havey RM, Patwardhan AG.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Nov 1;36(23):1932-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181fc1aff.

PMID:
21289581
6.

Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.

Dmitriev AE, Cunningham BW, Hu N, Sell G, Vigna F, McAfee PC.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 May 15;30(10):1165-72.

PMID:
15897831
7.

Cross-sectional neck response of a total human body FE model during simulated frontal and side automobile impacts.

White NA, Moreno DP, Gayzik FS, Stitzel JD.

Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2015;18(3):293-315. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2013.792918. Epub 2013 Aug 9.

PMID:
23930772
8.

Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion.

Chang UK, Kim DH, Lee MC, Willenberg R, Kim SH, Lim J.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Jul;7(1):33-9.

PMID:
17633485
9.

Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Dmitriev A, Hu N, Woo Kim S, Cappuccino A, Pimenta L.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Oct 15;28(20):S176-85.

PMID:
14560189
10.
11.

Biomechanical evaluation of a low-profile, anchored cervical interbody spacer device at the index level or adjacent to plated fusion.

Balaram AK, Ghanayem AJ, O╩╝Leary PT, Voronov LI, Havey RM, Carandang G, Abjornson C, Patwardhan AG.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jun 1;39(13):E763-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000344.

PMID:
24732831
12.
13.

Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct.

Stein MI, Nayak AN, Gaskins RB 3rd, Cabezas AF, Santoni BG, Castellvi AE.

Spine J. 2014 Jan;14(1):128-36. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.088. Epub 2013 Nov 12.

PMID:
24231054
14.

Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.

Hwang SH, Kayanja M, Milks RA, Benzel EC.

Spine J. 2007 Mar-Apr;7(2):216-21.

PMID:
17321972
15.

Facet joint contact pressure is not significantly affected by ProDisc cervical disc arthroplasty in sagittal bending: a single-level cadaveric study.

Bauman JA, Jaumard NV, Guarino BB, Weisshaar CL, Lipschutz DE, Welch WC, Winkelstein BA.

Spine J. 2012 Oct;12(10):949-59. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Sep 10.

PMID:
22975463
16.

Relationship between biomechanical changes at adjacent segments and number of fused bone grafts in multilevel cervical fusions: a finite element investigation.

Hussain M, Nassr A, Natarajan RN, An HS, Andersson GB.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jan;20(1):22-9. doi: 10.3171/2013.9.SPINE121081. Epub 2013 Nov 1.

PMID:
24180310
17.

Posterior facet load changes in adjacent segments due to moderate and severe degeneration in C5-C6 disc: a poroelastic C3-T1 finite element model study.

Hussain M, Natarajan RN, Chaudhary G, An HS, Andersson GB.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Jun;25(4):218-25. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182159776.

PMID:
22652989
18.

In vivo cervical facet joint capsule deformation during flexion-extension.

Anderst WJ, Donaldson WF 3rd, Lee JY, Kang JD.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 15;39(8):E514-20. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000235.

19.

Biomechanical effects of cervical arthroplasty with U-shaped disc implant on segmental range of motion and loading of surrounding soft tissue.

Mo ZJ, Zhao YB, Wang LZ, Sun Y, Zhang M, Fan YB.

Eur Spine J. 2014 Mar;23(3):613-21. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3070-4. Epub 2013 Oct 24.

20.

ProDisc cervical arthroplasty does not alter facet joint contact pressure during lateral bending or axial torsion.

Jaumard NV, Bauman JA, Guarino BB, Gokhale AJ, Lipschutz DE, Weisshaar CL, Welch WC, Winkelstein BA.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jan 15;38(2):E84-93. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827b8a2d.

PMID:
23132537

Supplemental Content

Support Center