Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 184

1.

Radiologist interpretive volume and breast cancer screening accuracy in a Canadian organized screening program.

Th├ęberge I, Chang SL, Vandal N, Daigle JM, Guertin MH, Pelletier E, Brisson J.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Mar;106(3):djt461. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt461.

2.

Effect of radiologists' diagnostic work-up volume on interpretive performance.

Buist DS, Anderson ML, Smith RA, Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Monsees BS, Sickles EA, Taplin SH, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Onega TL.

Radiology. 2014 Nov;273(2):351-64. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132806.

3.

Variability of interpretive accuracy among diagnostic mammography facilities.

Jackson SL, Taplin SH, Sickles EA, Abraham L, Barlow WE, Carney PA, Geller B, Berns EA, Cutter GR, Elmore JG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jun 3;101(11):814-27. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp105.

4.

Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.

Smith-Bindman R, Chu P, Miglioretti DL, Quale C, Rosenberg RD, Cutter G, Geller B, Bacchetti P, Sickles EA, Kerlikowske K.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Mar 2;97(5):358-67.

5.

Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States.

Buist DS, Anderson ML, Haneuse SJ, Sickles EA, Smith RA, Carney PA, Taplin SH, Rosenberg RD, Geller BM, Onega TL, Monsees BS, Bassett LW, Yankaskas BC, Elmore JG, Kerlikowske K, Miglioretti DL.

Radiology. 2011 Apr;259(1):72-84. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10101698.

6.

Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists.

Barlow WE, Chi C, Carney PA, Taplin SH, D'Orsi C, Cutter G, Hendrick RE, Elmore JG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Dec 15;96(24):1840-50.

7.

Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation.

Beam CA, Conant EF, Sickles EA.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Feb 19;95(4):282-90.

8.

Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy.

Elmore JG, Jackson SL, Abraham L, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Onega T, Rosenberg RD, Sickles EA, Buist DS.

Radiology. 2009 Dec;253(3):641-51. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2533082308.

9.

Radiologist characteristics associated with interpretive performance of diagnostic mammography.

Miglioretti DL, Smith-Bindman R, Abraham L, Brenner RJ, Carney PA, Bowles EJ, Buist DS, Elmore JG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Dec 19;99(24):1854-63.

10.

Mammographic interpretive volume and diagnostic mammogram interpretation performance in community practice.

Haneuse S, Buist DS, Miglioretti DL, Anderson ML, Carney PA, Onega T, Geller BM, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas BC, Elmore JG, Taplin SH, Smith RA, Sickles EA.

Radiology. 2012 Jan;262(1):69-79. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11111026.

12.

Mammography facility characteristics associated with interpretive accuracy of screening mammography.

Taplin S, Abraham L, Barlow WE, Fenton JJ, Berns EA, Carney PA, Cutter GR, Sickles EA, Carl D, Elmore JG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Jun 18;100(12):876-87. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn172.

13.

Physician workload in mammography.

Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Rosenberg R, Reid RJ, Taplin SH, Geller BM, Kerlikowske K; National Institutes of Health Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium..

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Feb;190(2):526-32. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2500.

PMID:
18212242
14.

Patient and Radiologist Characteristics Associated With Accuracy of Two Types of Diagnostic Mammograms.

Jackson SL, Abraham L, Miglioretti DL, Buist DS, Kerlikowske K, Onega T, Carney PA, Sickles EA, Elmore JG.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Aug;205(2):456-63. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13672.

15.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.

Lehman CD, Wellman RD, Buist DS, Kerlikowske K, Tosteson AN, Miglioretti DL; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium..

JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Nov;175(11):1828-37. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5231.

16.

Are radiologists' goals for mammography accuracy consistent with published recommendations?

Jackson SL, Cook AJ, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Geller BM, Onega T, Rosenberg RD, Brenner RJ, Elmore JG.

Acad Radiol. 2012 Mar;19(3):289-95. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.10.013.

17.

Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates.

Elmore JG, Miglioretti DL, Reisch LM, Barton MB, Kreuter W, Christiansen CL, Fletcher SW.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Sep 18;94(18):1373-80.

18.

Reassessment of breast cancers missed during routine screening mammography: a community-based study.

Yankaskas BC, Schell MJ, Bird RE, Desrochers DA.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Sep;177(3):535-41.

PMID:
11517043
19.

International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs.

Elmore JG, Nakano CY, Koepsell TD, Desnick LM, D'Orsi CJ, Ransohoff DF.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Sep 17;95(18):1384-93.

20.

Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.

Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Aug 1;99(15):1162-70.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center