Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 264

1.

Accuracy of mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.

Mariscotti G, Houssami N, Durando M, Bergamasco L, Campanino PP, Ruggieri C, Regini E, Luparia A, Bussone R, Sapino A, Fonio P, Gandini G.

Anticancer Res. 2014 Mar;34(3):1219-25.

PMID:
24596363
2.

Accuracy of tumour size assessment in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison of digital mammography, tomosynthesis, ultrasound and MRI.

Luparia A, Mariscotti G, Durando M, Ciatto S, Bosco D, Campanino PP, Castellano I, Sapino A, Gandini G.

Radiol Med. 2013 Oct;118(7):1119-36. doi: 10.1007/s11547-013-0941-z.

PMID:
23801389
3.

Locally advanced breast cancer: comparison of mammography, sonography and MR imaging in evaluation of residual disease in women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Londero V, Bazzocchi M, Del Frate C, Puglisi F, Di Loreto C, Francescutti G, Zuiani C.

Eur Radiol. 2004 Aug;14(8):1371-9.

PMID:
14986052
4.

Patient age and preoperative breast MRI in women with breast cancer: biopsy and surgical implications.

Adkisson CD, Vallow LA, Kowalchik K, McNeil R, Hines S, Deperi E, Moreno A, Roy V, Perez EA, McLaughlin SA.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jun;18(6):1678-83. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1491-4.

PMID:
21207171
5.

[Whole-body MRI in preoperative diagnostics of breast cancer--a comparison with [corrected] staging methods according to the S 3 guidelines].

Hausmann D, Kern C, Schröder MT, Sütterlin M, Schönberg SO, Neff KW, Dinter DJ.

Rofo. 2011 Dec;183(12):1130-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1281723. German. Erratum in: Rofo. 2011 Dec;183(12):e1.

PMID:
22068844
6.

Accuracy of predicting axillary lymph node positivity by physical examination, mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Valente SA, Levine GM, Silverstein MJ, Rayhanabad JA, Weng-Grumley JG, Ji L, Holmes DR, Sposto R, Sener SF.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jun;19(6):1825-30. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2200-7.

PMID:
22227922
7.

Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging aids the surgical management of invasive lobular breast cancer.

Kneeshaw PJ, Turnbull LW, Smith A, Drew PJ.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003 Feb;29(1):32-7.

PMID:
12559074
8.

Additional findings at preoperative breast MRI: the value of second-look digital breast tomosynthesis.

Clauser P, Carbonaro LA, Pancot M, Girometti R, Bazzocchi M, Zuiani C, Sardanelli F.

Eur Radiol. 2015 Oct;25(10):2830-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3720-5.

PMID:
25903704
9.

Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in ultrasonography-detected breast cancers.

Nam KJ, Han BK, Ko ES, Choi JS, Ko EY, Jeong DW, Choo KS.

Breast. 2015 Oct;24(5):649-55. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.07.039.

PMID:
26292782
10.

Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for invasive lobular cancer: good, better, but maybe not the best?

McGhan LJ, Wasif N, Gray RJ, Giurescu ME, Pizzitola VJ, Lorans R, Ocal IT, Stucky CC, Pockaj BA.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Oct;17 Suppl 3:255-62. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1266-y.

PMID:
20853043
11.

Defining an optimal role for breast magnetic resonance imaging when evaluating patients otherwise eligible for accelerated partial breast irradiation.

Horst KC, Fero KE, Ikeda DM, Daniel BL, Dirbas FM.

Radiother Oncol. 2013 Aug;108(2):220-5. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.01.019.

PMID:
23597699
12.

Multifocal, multicentric and contralateral breast cancers: breast MR imaging in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Girardi V, Carbognin G, Camera L, Baglio I, Bucci A, Bonetti F, Mucelli RP.

Radiol Med. 2011 Dec;116(8):1226-38. doi: 10.1007/s11547-011-0704-7. English, Italian.

PMID:
21744256
13.

Limited value and utility of breast MRI in patients undergoing breast-conserving cancer surgery.

Shin HC, Han W, Moon HG, Yom CK, Ahn SK, You JM, Kim JS, Chang JM, Cho N, Moon WK, Park IA, Noh DY.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Aug;19(8):2572-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2289-3.

PMID:
22446897
14.

MR mammography is useful in the preoperative locoregional staging of breast carcinomas with extensive intraductal component.

Van Goethem M, Schelfout K, Kersschot E, Colpaert C, Verslegers I, Biltjes I, Tjalma WA, De Schepper A, Weyler J, Parizel PM.

Eur J Radiol. 2007 May;62(2):273-82.

PMID:
17223002
15.

Breast magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative locoregional staging.

Hollingsworth AB, Stough RG, O'Dell CA, Brekke CE.

Am J Surg. 2008 Sep;196(3):389-97. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.10.009.

PMID:
18436185
16.

Accuracy of clinical examination, digital mammogram, ultrasound, and MRI in determining postneoadjuvant pathologic tumor response in operable breast cancer patients.

Croshaw R, Shapiro-Wright H, Svensson E, Erb K, Julian T.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;18(11):3160-3. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1919-5.

PMID:
21947594
17.

Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment.

Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E, Colpaert C, Schelfhout AM, Leyman P, Verslegers I, Biltjes I, Van Den Haute J, Gillardin JP, Tjalma W, Van Der Auwera JC, Buytaert P, De Schepper A.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004 Jun;30(5):501-7.

PMID:
15135477
18.

Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography.

Hata T, Takahashi H, Watanabe K, Takahashi M, Taguchi K, Itoh T, Todo S.

J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Feb;198(2):190-7.

PMID:
14759774
19.

Magnetic resonance imaging identifies multifocal and multicentric disease in breast cancer patients who are eligible for partial breast irradiation.

Al-Hallaq HA, Mell LK, Bradley JA, Chen LF, Ali AN, Weichselbaum RR, Newstead GM, Chmura SJ.

Cancer. 2008 Nov 1;113(9):2408-14. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23872.

20.

Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.

Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, Carter WB, Bhargavan M, Lewis RS, Ioffe OB.

Radiology. 2004 Dec;233(3):830-49.

PMID:
15486214
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center