Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 102

1.

Liquid crystalline epoxy nanocomposite material for dental application.

Tai YY, Hsu SH, Chen RS, Su WF, Chen MH.

J Formos Med Assoc. 2015 Jan;114(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2014.01.018. Epub 2014 Mar 1.

2.

Biphenyl liquid crystalline epoxy resin as a low-shrinkage resin-based dental restorative nanocomposite.

Hsu SH, Chen RS, Chang YL, Chen MH, Cheng KC, Su WF.

Acta Biomater. 2012 Nov;8(11):4151-61. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.07.030. Epub 2012 Jul 27.

PMID:
22842038
3.

Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.

Husain N, Kumar A.

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011 Mar 1;12(2):91-9.

PMID:
22186750
4.

Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs.

Bishara SE, Olsen ME, VonWald L, Jakobsen JR.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Jul;116(1):86-92.

PMID:
10393585
6.

Frictional forces and surface topography of a new ceramic bracket.

Tanne K, Matsubara S, Hotei Y, Sakuda M, Yoshida M.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Sep;106(3):273-8.

PMID:
8074092
7.

A comparative in vitro study of frictional resistance between lingual brackets and stainless steel archwires.

Ozturk Ortan Y, Yurdakuloglu Arslan T, Aydemir B.

Eur J Orthod. 2012 Feb;34(1):119-25. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq180. Epub 2011 Jan 13.

PMID:
21239394
8.

A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.

Read-Ward GE, Jones SP, Davies EH.

Br J Orthod. 1997 Nov;24(4):309-17.

PMID:
9459030
9.

Frictional forces between lingual brackets and archwires measured by a friction tester.

Park JH, Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW.

Angle Orthod. 2004 Dec;74(6):816-24.

PMID:
15673146
10.

A study of the frictional characteristics of four commercially available self-ligating bracket systems.

Budd S, Daskalogiannakis J, Tompson BD.

Eur J Orthod. 2008 Dec;30(6):645-53. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn058. Epub 2008 Oct 28.

PMID:
18974067
11.

Frictional resistance exerted by different lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study.

Lombardo L, Wierusz W, Toscano D, Lapenta R, Kaplan A, Siciliani G.

Prog Orthod. 2013 Oct 18;14:37. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-37.

12.

The dynamic frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and arch wires.

Tselepis M, Brockhurst P, West VC.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Aug;106(2):131-8.

PMID:
8059748
13.

In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic brackets.

Nishio C, da Motta AF, Elias CN, Mucha JN.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Jan;125(1):56-64.

PMID:
14718880
14.

Evaluation of the effect of bracket and archwire composition on frictional forces in the buccal segments.

Nair SV, Padmanabhan R, Janardhanam P.

Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Mar-Apr;23(2):203-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.100426.

15.

Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets.

Pizzoni L, Ravnholt G, Melsen B.

Eur J Orthod. 1998 Jun;20(3):283-91.

PMID:
9699406
16.

Surface roughness of three types of modern plastic bracket slot floors and frictional resistance.

Choi SH, Kang DY, Hwang CJ.

Angle Orthod. 2014 Jan;84(1):177-83. doi: 10.2319/030313-179.1. Epub 2013 Jun 14.

PMID:
23767940
17.
18.

Frictional resistance in orthodontic brackets with repeated use.

Kapur R, Sinha PK, Nanda RS.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Oct;116(4):400-4.

PMID:
10511667
19.

Conventionally ligated versus self-ligating metal brackets--a comparative study.

Reicheneder CA, Gedrange T, Berrisch S, Proff P, Baumert U, Faltermeier A, Muessig D.

Eur J Orthod. 2008 Dec;30(6):654-60. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn053. Epub 2008 Nov 21.

PMID:
19028673
20.

Low shrinkage light curable nanocomposite for dental restorative material.

Chen MH, Chen CR, Hsu SH, Sun SP, Su WF.

Dent Mater. 2006 Feb;22(2):138-45. Epub 2005 Jul 22.

PMID:
16040115

Supplemental Content

Support Center