Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 129

1.

Estimating the health effects of greenhouse gas mitigation strategies: addressing parametric, model, and valuation challenges.

Remais JV, Hess JJ, Ebi KL, Markandya A, Balbus JM, Wilkinson P, Haines A, Chalabi Z.

Environ Health Perspect. 2014 May;122(5):447-55. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1306744.

2.

Assessing the co-benefits of greenhouse gas reduction: health benefits of particulate matter related inspection and maintenance programs in Bangkok, Thailand.

Li Y, Crawford-Brown DJ.

Sci Total Environ. 2011 Apr 15;409(10):1774-85. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.01.051.

PMID:
21334726
3.

U.S. Air Quality and Health Benefits from Avoided Climate Change under Greenhouse Gas Mitigation.

Garcia-Menendez F, Saari RK, Monier E, Selin NE.

Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Jul 7;49(13):7580-8. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01324.

PMID:
26053628
4.

Building-related health impacts in European and Chinese cities: a scalable assessment method.

Tuomisto JT, Niittynen M, Pärjälä E, Asikainen A, Perez L, Trüeb S, Jantunen M, Künzli N, Sabel CE.

Environ Health. 2015 Dec 14;14:93. doi: 10.1186/s12940-015-0082-z.

5.

Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).

Bogner J, Pipatti R, Hashimoto S, Diaz C, Mareckova K, Diaz L, Kjeldsen P, Monni S, Faaij A, Gao Q, Zhang T, Ahmed MA, Sutamihardja RT, Gregory R; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Working Group III (Mitigation)..

Waste Manag Res. 2008 Feb;26(1):11-32. Review.

PMID:
18338699
6.

Co-benefits, trade-offs, barriers and policies for greenhouse gas mitigation in the agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sector.

Bustamante M, Robledo-Abad C, Harper R, Mbow C, Ravindranat NH, Sperling F, Haberl H, Pinto Ade S, Smith P.

Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Oct;20(10):3270-90. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12591. Review.

PMID:
24700759
7.

Obesity and climate change mitigation in Australia: overview and analysis of policies with co-benefits.

Lowe M.

Aust N Z J Public Health. 2014 Feb;38(1):19-24. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12150. Review.

PMID:
24494940
8.

Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: overview and implications for policy makers.

Haines A, McMichael AJ, Smith KR, Roberts I, Woodcock J, Markandya A, Armstrong BG, Campbell-Lendrum D, Dangour AD, Davies M, Bruce N, Tonne C, Barrett M, Wilkinson P.

Lancet. 2009 Dec 19;374(9707):2104-14. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61759-1. Review.

PMID:
19942281
9.

Variation in estimated ozone-related health impacts of climate change due to modeling choices and assumptions.

Post ES, Grambsch A, Weaver C, Morefield P, Huang J, Leung LY, Nolte CG, Adams P, Liang XZ, Zhu JH, Mahoney H.

Environ Health Perspect. 2012 Nov;120(11):1559-64. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104271.

10.

A methodology for estimating health benefits of electricity generation using renewable technologies.

Partridge I, Gamkhar S.

Environ Int. 2012 Feb;39(1):103-10. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2011.10.003.

PMID:
22208748
11.
12.

Temperature increase of 21st century mitigation scenarios.

Van Vuuren DP, Meinshausen M, Plattner GK, Joos F, Strassmann KM, Smith SJ, Wigley TM, Raper SC, Riahi K, de la Chesnaye F, den Elzen MG, Fujino J, Jiang K, Nakicenovic N, Paltsev S, Reilly JM.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Oct 7;105(40):15258-62. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711129105.

13.
14.

Sources, pathways, and relative risks of contaminants in surface water and groundwater: a perspective prepared for the Walkerton inquiry.

Ritter L, Solomon K, Sibley P, Hall K, Keen P, Mattu G, Linton B.

J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2002 Jan 11;65(1):1-142. Review.

PMID:
11809004
15.

Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.

Paciorek CJ, Liu Y; HEI Health Review Committee..

Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2012 May;(167):5-83; discussion 85-91.

PMID:
22838153
16.

Ancillary human health benefits of improved air quality resulting from climate change mitigation.

Bell ML, Davis DL, Cifuentes LA, Krupnick AJ, Morgenstern RD, Thurston GD.

Environ Health. 2008 Jul 31;7:41. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-7-41. Review.

17.

A self-consistent method to assess air quality co-benefits from U.S. climate policies.

Saari RK, Selin NE, Rausch S, Thompson TM.

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2015 Jan;65(1):74-89. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2014.959139.

PMID:
25946960
18.

Uncertainties associated with quantifying climate change impacts on human health: a case study for diarrhea.

Kolstad EW, Johansson KA.

Environ Health Perspect. 2011 Mar;119(3):299-305. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002060.

19.

The influence of spatial resolution on human health risk co-benefit estimates for global climate policy assessments.

Shih HC, Crawford-Brown D, Ma HW.

J Environ Manage. 2015 Mar 15;151:393-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.12.020.

PMID:
25594745
20.

GLIMPSE: a rapid decision framework for energy and environmental policy.

Akhtar FH, Pinder RW, Loughlin DH, Henze DK.

Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(21):12011-9. doi: 10.1021/es402283j.

PMID:
24044746
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center