Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 148

1.

A simple and highly effective method for slow-freezing human pluripotent stem cells using dimethyl sulfoxide, hydroxyethyl starch and ethylene glycol.

Imaizumi K, Nishishita N, Muramatsu M, Yamamoto T, Takenaka C, Kawamata S, Kobayashi K, Nishikawa S, Akuta T.

PLoS One. 2014 Feb 12;9(2):e88696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088696. eCollection 2014.

2.

A Simple and Efficient Method of Slow Freezing for Human Embryonic Stem Cells and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Imaizumi K, Iha M, Nishishita N, Kawamata S, Nishikawa S, Akuta T.

Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1341:15-24. doi: 10.1007/7651_2015_211.

PMID:
26069023
3.

Efficient recovery of undifferentiated human embryonic stem cell cryopreserved with hydroxyethyl starch, dimethyl sulphoxide and serum replacement.

Orellana MD, De Santis GC, Abraham KJ, Fontes AM, Magalhães DA, Oliveira Vde C, Costa Ede B, Palma PV, Covas DT.

Cryobiology. 2015 Aug;71(1):151-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 29.

4.

Optimization of slow cooling cryopreservation for human pluripotent stem cells.

Miyazaki T, Nakatsuji N, Suemori H.

Genesis. 2014 Jan;52(1):49-55. doi: 10.1002/dvg.22725. Epub 2013 Dec 3.

PMID:
24254533
5.

Effective surface-based cryopreservation of human embryonic stem cells by vitrification.

Beier AF, Schulz JC, Dörr D, Katsen-Globa A, Sachinidis A, Hescheler J, Zimmermann H.

Cryobiology. 2011 Dec;63(3):175-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Sep 3.

PMID:
21910982
6.

Cryopreservation of primate embryonic stem cells with chemically-defined solution without Me2SO.

Nishigaki T, Teramura Y, Suemori H, Iwata H.

Cryobiology. 2010 Apr;60(2):159-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2009.10.007. Epub 2009 Oct 24.

PMID:
19857481
7.

Cryopreservation of human embryonic stem cells without the use of a programmable freezer.

Ha SY, Jee BC, Suh CS, Kim HS, Oh SK, Kim SH, Moon SY.

Hum Reprod. 2005 Jul;20(7):1779-85. Epub 2005 Mar 10.

PMID:
15760949
8.

Effect of different freezing rates during cryopreservation of rat mesenchymal stem cells using combinations of hydroxyethyl starch and dimethylsulfoxide.

Naaldijk Y, Staude M, Fedorova V, Stolzing A.

BMC Biotechnol. 2012 Aug 13;12:49. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-12-49.

9.

Comparison of vitrification and conventional freezing for cryopreservation of caprine embryos.

Araújo-Lemos PF, Freitas Neto LM, Moura MT, Melo JV, Lima PF, Oliveira MA.

Zygote. 2015 Aug;23(4):594-602. doi: 10.1017/S0967199414000215. Epub 2014 Jun 25.

PMID:
24964134
10.

Cryopreservation of Endothelial Cells in Various Cryoprotective Agents and Media - Vitrification versus Slow Freezing Methods.

von Bomhard A, Elsässer A, Ritschl LM, Schwarz S, Rotter N.

PLoS One. 2016 Feb 18;11(2):e0149660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149660. eCollection 2016.

11.

Comparison of slow freezing and vitrification on ovine immature oocytes.

Bhat MH, Sharma V, Khan FA, Naykoo NA, Yaqoob SH, Ruby, Khan HM, Fazili MR, Ganai NA, Shah RA.

Cryo Letters. 2014 Jan-Feb;35(1):77-82.

PMID:
24872161
12.

Cryopreservation of human pluripotent stem cells: a general protocol.

Miyazaki T, Suemori H.

Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1235:97-104. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1785-3_9.

PMID:
25388389
13.

An effective serum- and xeno-free chemically defined freezing procedure for human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells.

Holm F, Ström S, Inzunza J, Baker D, Strömberg AM, Rozell B, Feki A, Bergström R, Hovatta O.

Hum Reprod. 2010 May;25(5):1271-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq040. Epub 2010 Mar 5.

14.

Influence of cell loss after vitrification or slow-freezing on further in vitro development and implantation of human Day 3 embryos.

Van Landuyt L, Van de Velde H, De Vos A, Haentjens P, Blockeel C, Tournaye H, Verheyen G.

Hum Reprod. 2013 Nov;28(11):2943-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det356. Epub 2013 Sep 5.

PMID:
24014599
15.

Closed-system solid surface vitrification versus slow programmable freezing of mouse 2-cell embryos.

Vutyavanich T, Sreshthaputra O, Piromlertamorn W, Nunta S.

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009 May;26(5):285-90. doi: 10.1007/s10815-009-9324-8. Epub 2009 Jul 15.

17.

Comparison of the effects of glycerol, dimethyl sulfoxide, and hydroxyethyl starch solutions for cryopreservation of avian red blood cells.

Graham JE, Meola DM, Kini NR, Hoffman AM.

Am J Vet Res. 2015 Jun;76(6):487-93. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.76.6.487.

PMID:
26000595
18.

Viability and function of the cryopreserved whole rat ovary: comparison between slow-freezing and vitrification.

Milenkovic M, Diaz-Garcia C, Wallin A, Brännström M.

Fertil Steril. 2012 May;97(5):1176-82. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.01.123. Epub 2012 Feb 16.

PMID:
22341373
19.

Highly efficient cryopreservation of human induced pluripotent stem cells using a dimethyl sulfoxide-free solution.

Nishigaki T, Teramura Y, Nasu A, Takada K, Toguchida J, Iwata H.

Int J Dev Biol. 2011;55(3):305-11. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.103145tn.

20.

Long-term storage of peripheral blood stem cells frozen and stored with a conventional liquid nitrogen technique compared with cells frozen and stored in a mechanical freezer.

McCullough J, Haley R, Clay M, Hubel A, Lindgren B, Moroff G.

Transfusion. 2010 Apr;50(4):808-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02482.x. Epub 2009 Nov 13. Erratum in: Transfusion. 2010 Oct;50(10):2285.

PMID:
19912586

Supplemental Content

Support Center