Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 99

1.

Synchrotron light-based μCT to analyse the presence of dentinal microcracks post-rotary and reciprocating NiTi instrumentation.

Pop I, Manoharan A, Zanini F, Tromba G, Patel S, Foschi F.

Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Jan;19(1):11-6. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1206-5. Epub 2014 Feb 15.

PMID:
24532388
2.

Lack of causal relationship between dentinal microcracks and root canal preparation with reciprocation systems.

De-Deus G, Silva EJ, Marins J, Souza E, Neves Ade A, Gonçalves Belladonna F, Alves H, Lopes RT, Versiani MA.

J Endod. 2014 Sep;40(9):1447-50. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.02.019. Epub 2014 Apr 21.

PMID:
25146030
3.

Dentinal microcrack formation during root canal preparations by different NiTi rotary instruments and the self-adjusting file.

Yoldas O, Yilmaz S, Atakan G, Kuden C, Kasan Z.

J Endod. 2012 Feb;38(2):232-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.10.011. Epub 2011 Dec 5.

PMID:
22244643
4.

Assessment of dentinal damage during canal preparation using reciprocating and rotary files.

Kansal R, Rajput A, Talwar S, Roongta R, Verma M.

J Endod. 2014 Sep;40(9):1443-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.02.015. Epub 2014 Apr 13.

PMID:
25146029
5.

Effects of three nickel titanium instrument systems on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography.

Gergi R, Osta N, Bourbouze G, Zgheib C, Arbab-Chirani R, Naaman A.

Int Endod J. 2015 Feb;48(2):162-70. doi: 10.1111/iej.12296. Epub 2014 May 12.

PMID:
24717063
6.

Changes in centring and shaping ability using three nickel–titanium instrumentation techniques analysed by micro-computed tomography (μCT).

Stern S, Patel S, Foschi F, Sherriff M, Mannocci F.

Int Endod J. 2012 Jun;45(6):514-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.02004.x.

PMID:
22625863
7.

Incidence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation: reciprocating versus rotary instrumentation.

Bürklein S, Tsotsis P, Schäfer E.

J Endod. 2013 Apr;39(4):501-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.045. Epub 2013 Jan 26.

PMID:
23522545
8.

Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of canal transportation instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium instruments.

Gergi R, Arbab-Chirani R, Osta N, Naaman A.

J Endod. 2014 Aug;40(8):1223-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.01.039. Epub 2014 Mar 18.

PMID:
25069937
9.
10.

Micro-computed Tomographic Assessment on the Effect of ProTaper Next and Twisted File Adaptive Systems on Dentinal Cracks.

De-Deus G, Belladonna FG, Souza EM, Silva EJ, Neves Ade A, Alves H, Lopes RT, Versiani MA.

J Endod. 2015 Jul;41(7):1116-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.02.012. Epub 2015 Mar 25.

PMID:
25817212
11.

Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study.

Zhao D, Shen Y, Peng B, Haapasalo M.

J Endod. 2014 Nov;40(11):1860-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.06.023. Epub 2014 Sep 6.

PMID:
25205262
12.

The influence of different angles and reciprocation on the shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary root canal instruments.

Al-Sudani D, Kaabi H, Al Gamdi A, Al Dakheel A.

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Jul 1;15(4):451-5.

PMID:
25576112
13.

A micro-computed tomography-based comparison of the canal transportation and centering ability of ProTaper Universal rotary and WaveOne reciprocating files.

McRay B, Cox TC, Cohenca N, Johnson JD, Paranjpe A.

Quintessence Int. 2014 Feb;45(2):101-8. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a30998.

PMID:
24389561
14.

[µCT analysis of mandibular molars before and after instrumentation by Reciproc files].

Ametrano G, Riccitiello F, Amato M, Formisano A, Muto M, Grassi R, Valletta A, Simeone M.

Recenti Prog Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;104(7-8):420-4. doi: 10.1701/1315.14589. Italian.

PMID:
24042421
15.

Root surface strain during canal shaping and its influence on apical microcrack development: a preliminary investigation.

Jamleh A, Komabayashi T, Ebihara A, Nassar M, Watanabe S, Yoshioka T, Miyara K, Suda H.

Int Endod J. 2015 Dec;48(12):1103-11. doi: 10.1111/iej.12406. Epub 2014 Dec 8.

PMID:
25377258
16.

"Dentinal microcracks after root canal preparation" a comparative evaluation with hand, rotary and reciprocating instrumentation.

Priya NT, Chandrasekhar V, Anita S, Tummala M, Raj TB, Badami V, Kumar P, Soujanya E.

J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Dec;8(12):ZC70-2. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/11437.5349. Epub 2014 Dec 5.

17.

Microtomography-based comparison of reciprocating single-file F2 ProTaper technique versus rotary full sequence.

Paqué F, Zehnder M, De-Deus G.

J Endod. 2011 Oct;37(10):1394-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.06.031. Epub 2011 Aug 6.

PMID:
21924189
18.

Correlative bacteriologic and micro-computed tomographic analysis of mandibular molar mesial canals prepared by self-adjusting file, reciproc, and twisted file systems.

Siqueira JF Jr, Alves FR, Versiani MA, Rôças IN, Almeida BM, Neves MA, Sousa-Neto MD.

J Endod. 2013 Aug;39(8):1044-50. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.034. Epub 2013 Jun 5.

PMID:
23880274
19.

Potential relationship between design of nickel-titanium rotary instruments and vertical root fracture.

Kim HC, Lee MH, Yum J, Versluis A, Lee CJ, Kim BM.

J Endod. 2010 Jul;36(7):1195-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.010. Epub 2010 Mar 15.

PMID:
20630298
20.

Evaluation of a rotary instrumentation method for C-shaped canals with micro-computed tomography.

Cheung LH, Cheung GS.

J Endod. 2008 Oct;34(10):1233-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.015. Epub 2008 Aug 23.

PMID:
18793928

Supplemental Content

Support Center